Facial recognition software, which American military and intelligence agencies used for years in Iraq and Afghanistan to identify potential terrorists, is being eagerly adopted by dozens of police departments around the country to pursue drug dealers, prostitutes and other conventional criminal suspects. But because it is being used with few guidelines and with little oversight or public disclosure, it is raising questions of privacy and concerns about potential misuse.
Law enforcement officers say the technology is much faster than fingerprinting at identifying suspects, although it is unclear how much it is helping the police make arrests.
When Aaron Harvey was stopped by the police here in 2013 while driving near his grandmother’s house, an officer not only searched his car, he said, but also took his photograph and ran it through the software to try to confirm his identity and determine whether he had a criminal record.
Eric Hanson, a retired firefighter, had a similar experience last summer. Stopped by the police after a dispute with a man he said was a prowler, he was ordered to sit on a curb, he said, while officers took his photo with an iPad and ran it through the same facial recognition software. The officers also used a cotton swab to collect a DNA sample from the inside of his cheek.
Neither man was arrested. Neither had consented to being photographed. Both said officers had told them that they were using facial recognition technology.
“I was thinking, ‘Why are you taking pictures of me, doing this to me?’ ” said Mr. Hanson, 58, who has no criminal record. “I felt like my identity was being stolen. I’m a straight-up, no lie, cheat or steal guy, and I get treated like a criminal.”
Lt. Scott Wahl, a spokesman for the 1,900-member San Diego Police Department, said the department does not require police officers to file a report when they use the facial recognition technology but do not make an arrest. The department has no record of the stops involving Mr. Hanson and Mr. Harvey, and Lieutenant Wahl said that he did not know about the incidents but that they could have happened.
“It is a test product for the region that we’ve allowed officers to use,” he said of facial recognition software and the hand-held devices the police use to take pictures. “We don’t even know how many are out there” in the region.
He said that until June 19, his department did not have a written policy regulating facial recognition software and only recently began training officers on its lawful use. Before then, he said, there were interim regional guidelines and training available.
County documents show that over 33 days in January and February, 26 San Diego law enforcement agencies used the software to try to identify people on more than 20,600 occasions — although officers found a match to criminal records only about 25 percent of the time.
Lieutenant Wahl said the department was not aware of any complaints about the software or about the policy of collecting DNA samples that Mr. Hanson and others have described.
The department uses the technology judiciously, Lieutenant Wahl said. “We don’t just drive around taking people’s picture and start swabbing them,” he said.
Others say misuse is common.
The Latest on: Facial Recognition Software
via Google News
The Latest on: Facial Recognition Software
- Surprising results after activists test facial recognition technology on Denver City Councilon January 13, 2020 at 9:33 pm
Amazon has already sold it’s facial recognition software to several government agencies. Although no agency in the Denver Metro is using it, signatures are being gathered to get a ban on the ballot.
- Washington state lawmakers debut legislation for consumer privacy and facial recognitionon January 13, 2020 at 5:31 pm
Microsoft was a key player in the effort to enact privacy regulations in Washington state last session. The Redmond, Wash., software giant is a vocal advocate for data privacy laws and facial ...
- The benefits of facial recognition AI are being wildly overstatedon January 13, 2020 at 12:44 pm
Facial recognition technology has run amok across the globe ... When law enforcement agencies claim they use crime-prediction software, what they really mean is that they have a computer telling them ...
- Johnson Controls launches AI-enabled facial matching softwareon January 13, 2020 at 11:45 am
With the AI-enabled system, retail businesses, venues or educational institutions can receive mobile notifications when terminated employees, a returning suspected shoplifter, or person of interest, ...
- City Employee Claims SDPD Hid Information on Facial Recognition Programon January 12, 2020 at 4:15 pm
A former city of San Diego employee claims the San Diego Police Department attempted to hide information about its use of facial recognition software. While the use of a facial recognition program was ...
- How the Police Use Facial Recognition, and Where It Falls Shorton January 12, 2020 at 2:17 pm
Records from Florida, where law enforcement has long used the controversial technology, offer an inside look at its risks and rewards.
- No, facial-recognition tech is not some racist Skyneton January 12, 2020 at 5:14 am
How ridiculous are fears about facial-recognition technology? Well, “advocates” from the Surveillance Technology ... The MTA should use this tech: It has a huge fare-beating problem. The software can ...
- Facial recognition is coming to more smart home cameras: Why you should be worriedon January 11, 2020 at 10:19 am
Amazon’s Rekognition software, which can match faces with a huge database? What to know before buying a camera with facial recognition Before you purchase a security camera, especially one with facial ...
- Facial recognition could take over, one 'convenience' at a timeon January 10, 2020 at 5:04 am
I looked at the screen showing the photo the kiosk took of me when I walked in. The camera had caught just my eyes and nose. Still, the facial recognition software calculated it detected me with 60.5% ...
- San Diego’s massive, 7-year experiment with facial recognition technology appears to be a flopon January 9, 2020 at 5:00 am
Statewide, concerns about the expanded use of facial recognition technology in San Francisco, Los Angeles, and other cities led to pressure on lawmakers to pass the ban. Back in the fall, the American ...
via Bing News