Since 1955, The Journal of Irreproducible Results has offered “spoofs, parodies, whimsies, burlesques, lampoons and satires” about life in the laboratory.
Among its greatest hits: “Acoustic Oscillations in Jell-O, With and Without Fruit, Subjected to Varying Levels of Stress” and “Utilizing Infinite Loops to Compute an Approximate Value of Infinity.” The good-natured jibes are a backhanded celebration of science. What really goes on in the lab is, by implication, of a loftier, more serious nature.
It has been jarring to learn in recent years that a reproducible result may actually be the rarest of birds. Replication, the ability of another lab to reproduce a finding, is the gold standard of science, reassurance that you have discovered something true. But that is getting harder all the time. With the most accessible truths already discovered, what remains are often subtle effects, some so delicate that they can be conjured up only under ideal circumstances, using highly specialized techniques.
Fears that this is resulting in some questionable findings began to emerge in 2005, when Dr. John P. A. Ioannidis, a kind of meta-scientist who researches research, wrote a paper pointedly titled “Why Most Published Research Findings Are False.”
Given the desire for ambitious scientists to break from the pack with a striking new finding, Dr. Ioannidis reasoned, many hypotheses already start with a high chance of being wrong. Otherwise proving them right would not be so difficult and surprising — and supportive of a scientist’s career. Taking into account the human tendency to see what we want to see, unconscious bias is inevitable. Without any ill intent, a scientist may be nudged toward interpreting the data so it supports the hypothesis, even if just barely.
The effect is amplified by competition for a shrinking pool of grant money and also by the design of so many experiments — with small sample sizes (cells in a lab dish or people in an epidemiological pool) and weak standards for what passes as statistically significant. That makes it all the easier to fool oneself.
Paradoxically the hottest fields, with the most people pursuing the same questions, are most prone to error, Dr. Ioannidis argued. If one of five competing labs is alone in finding an effect, that result is the one likely to be published. But there is a four in five chance that it is wrong. Papers reporting negative conclusions are more easily ignored.
Putting all of this together, Dr. Ioannidis devised a mathematical model supporting the conclusion that most published findings are probably incorrect.
The Latest on: Research results
[google_news title=”” keyword=”Research results” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Research results
- AI Is Here to Stay: Marketing Must Adopt or Get Left Behind: New Research From Info-Tech Research Groupon April 23, 2024 at 10:31 am
As AI continues to reshape the business landscape, marketers face many challenges and opportunities, from integrating the most impactful AI strategies to aligning them seamlessly with overarching ...
- Trucking research firm touts renewable diesel fuel over EV transitionon April 23, 2024 at 10:02 am
With the right kind of fuel, internal combustion engines can be used to meet climate policy goals in transportation without going to all-electric trucks, according to ATRI. The post Trucking research ...
- Mt. Gox's Looming $9B Payout Could Weigh on Bitcoin Prices, K33 Research Warnson April 23, 2024 at 9:49 am
The defunct crypto exchange will distribute 142,000 BTC and 143,000 BCH to creditors later this year, 10 years after its implosion due to a hack.
- Strange 'minimoon' orbiting alongside Earth may be a piece of the far side of the moon, new research hintson April 23, 2024 at 5:00 am
The near-Earth asteroid Kamo'oalewa, which orbits alongside our planet as a 'minimoon,' may have originated from Giordano Bruno crater on the far side of the moon, new research suggests.
- Apple iPhone sales drop 19% in China as demand for Huawei smartphones soars, research sayson April 23, 2024 at 3:49 am
Apple saw sales of its iPhones fall 19.1% in the first three months of the year, according to data from Counterpoint Research. It comes as Chinese tech giant Huawei saw a 69.7% surge in smartphone ...
- Apple iPhone sales tumbled in China in first quarter, research firm sayson April 23, 2024 at 2:20 am
Apple iPhone sales tumbled in China during the first quarter, a research firm said Tuesday. Counterpoint reported that iPhone sales volumes dropped 19%, during a quarter in which smartphone sales in ...
- Transferring Biomedical Research to Patients Faster: ForTra gGmbH Announces Positive Funding Track Recordon April 23, 2024 at 1:25 am
Closing the gap between basic research and clinical applicationMore than 50 percent of all funded projects received follow-up fundingBad Homburg ...
- Learn to research historic homes during free programon April 23, 2024 at 12:34 am
Local architectural historians Jeffrey Green and Ted Ligibel will discuss how to research historic homes April 30 at the Monroe County Museum.
- Officials urge people to do their research before voting in May’s electionon April 22, 2024 at 4:08 pm
Early voting is underway for May’s municipal races that will run until April 30. Officials remind people that their vote is their voice and are encouraged to do their research before hitting the polls ...
- The highest-paying in-demand jobs that don't require a degree, according to new researchon April 22, 2024 at 6:00 am
Demand for skilled tradespeople is expected to increase over the next decade and remain high in the U.S., McKinsey & Co. reports.
via Bing News