The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Learn more:Â In crowd wisdom, the ‘surprisingly popular’ answer can trump ignorance of the masses
[osd_subscribe categories=’crowd-wisdom’ placeholder=’Email Address’ button_text=’Subscribe Now for any new posts on the topic “CROWD WISDOM”‘]
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOMÂ article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
[google_news title=”” keyword=”crowd wisdom” num_posts=”10″ blurb_length=”0″ show_thumb=”left”]
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- The IRA’s New Conventional Wisdomon March 28, 2024 at 12:06 pm
Even though the law passed Congress with no Republican votes, it would likely survive future GOP control of Washington.
- No One Ends a Comedy Show Like Tig Notaroon March 28, 2024 at 11:01 am
In her specials and albums, the stand-up constantly pushes the boundaries of what audiences might expect from a closing joke.
- Why the Eric Gaff, Mark Johnson dynamic is key for South Bend Saint Joseph boys basketballon March 28, 2024 at 2:05 am
Five years later, Johnson will watch from the crowd as Gaff leads the South Bend Saint Joseph ... and that’s what you want in a guy that you’re going to look to for advice and wisdom.” More:A 36-year ...
- On Lent, more ears and less mouthon March 28, 2024 at 2:00 am
You invited them in?” I’d chuckled to my mother-in-law. Visiting from Brooklyn, I’d found her, teapot in hand, deep in conversation with proselytizing strangers who’d rung her Cincinnati ...
- Women on a Mission Annual Conference inspires professionalson March 27, 2024 at 4:00 am
Women on a Mission's 15th annual conference was held at Bellevue University on March 22 with a range of speakers discussing topics covering education, spirituality, health, finance, and negotiation.
- AI forecaster can predict the future better than humanson March 26, 2024 at 8:01 am
An AI forecaster based on the language model GPT-4 can predict the outcome of future events more accurately than single humans. In some cases, it can even outperform the “wisdom of crowds” ...
- The Wisdom of Morrie: A Son’s Perspectiveon March 26, 2024 at 1:58 am
One of the reasons we chose an active adult community for the next chapter of our lives was the myriad of opportunities to join clubs and experience events. We have just scratched the surface in our ...
- Lauren Boebert Mocked Over Crowd Size at GOP Eventon March 25, 2024 at 4:48 am
Representative Lauren Boebert, a Colorado Republican, was mocked online on Sunday over the crowd size she attracted at a GOP event in her home state.
- Forgiveness for the foolish: Easter reflections on “Bluey” and the gentle call of wisdomon March 25, 2024 at 4:12 am
Bluey” is not a judgemental show: its wisdom is never offered with a stern glance and warnings about the consequences of doing otherwise — which is why it has the feeling of an invitation, an ...
via Bing News