The first system-level picture of nearly 100 million individuals expressing vaccine views among Facebook’s 3 billion users across 37 countries, continents and languages.
Researchers warn scientists are fighting health misinformation in the wrong place
Communities on Facebook that distrust establishment health guidance are more effective than government health agencies and other reliable health groups at reaching and engaging “undecided” individuals, according to a first-of-its-kind study published today by researchers at George Washington University and other institutions in the journal Nature.
The researchers tracked the vaccine conversation among 100 million Facebook users during the height of the 2019 measles outbreak. The new study and its “battleground” map reveal how distrust in establishment health guidance could spread and dominate online conversations over the next decade, potentially jeopardizing public health efforts to protect populations from COVID-19 and future pandemics through vaccinations.
Professor Neil Johnson and his GW research team, including professor Yonatan Lupu and researchers Nicolas Velasquez, Rhys Leahy and Nico Restrepo, collaborated with researchers at the University of Miami, Michigan State University and Los Alamos National Laboratory to better understand how distrust in scientific expertise evolves online, especially related to vaccines.
“There is a new world war online surrounding trust in health expertise and science, particularly with misinformation about COVID-19, but also distrust in big pharmaceuticals and governments,” Dr. Johnson said. “Nobody knew what the field of battle looked like, though, so we set to find out.”
During the 2019 measles outbreak, the research team examined Facebook communities, totaling nearly 100 million users, which were active around the vaccine topic and which formed a highly dynamic, interconnected network across cities, countries, continents and languages. The team identified three camps comprising pro-vaccination communities, anti-vaccination communities and communities of undecided individuals such as parenting groups. Starting with one community, the researchers looked to find a second one that was strongly entangled with the original, and so on, to better understand how they interacted with each other.
They discovered that, while there are fewer individuals with anti-vaccination sentiments on Facebook than with pro-vaccination sentiments, there are nearly three times the number of anti-vaccination communities on Facebook than pro-vaccination communities. This allows anti-vaccination communities to become highly entangled with undecided communities, while pro-vaccination communities remain mostly peripheral. In addition, pro-vaccination communities that focused on countering larger anti-vaccination communities may be missing medium-sized ones growing under the radar.
The researchers also found anti-vaccination communities offer more diverse narratives around vaccines and other established health treatments — promoting safety concerns, conspiracy theories or individual choice, for example — that can appeal to more of Facebook’s approximately 3 billion users, thus increasing the chances of influencing individuals in undecided communities. Pro-vaccination communities, on the other hand, mostly offered monothematic messaging typically focused on the established public health benefits of vaccinations. The GW researchers noted that individuals in these undecided communities, far from being passive bystanders, were actively engaging with vaccine content.
“We thought we would see major public health entities and state-run health departments at the center of this online battle, but we found the opposite. They were fighting off to one side, in the wrong place,” Dr. Johnson said.
As scientists around the world scramble to develop an effective COVID-19 vaccine, the spread of health disinformation and misinformation has important public health implications, especially on social media, which often serves as an amplifier and information equalizer.
In their study, the GW researchers proposed several different strategies to fight against online disinformation, including influencing the heterogeneity of individual communities to delay onset and decrease their growth and manipulating the links between communities in order to prevent the spread of negative views.
“Instead of playing whack-a-mole with a global network of communities that consume and produce (mis)information, public health agencies, social media platforms and governments can use a map like ours and an entirely new set of strategies to identify where the largest theaters of online activity are and engage and neutralize those communities peddling in misinformation so harmful to the public,” Dr. Johnson said.
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Coronavirus conspiracy theories threaten our health – yet clear government messaging can stop themon June 23, 2020 at 6:27 am
People who believe in conspiracy theories are less likely to follow lockdown rules – and social media is acting as an amplifier for these dangerous beliefs – according to a new study by King’s College ...
- With over 250,000 cases, misinformation is compromising Africa’s Covid-19 responseon June 22, 2020 at 8:04 am
When the first cases of Covid-19 were recorded in Africa in February, it was clear governments across the continent faced a test against tackling the virus as well as misinformation. Within days of ...
- What If the Biggest Source of Coronavirus Misinformation is the Government?on June 22, 2020 at 2:56 am
On June 24 th, the House Energy and Commerce Committee will hold a joint subcommittee hearing about coronavirus misinformation. The hearing is seemingly intended to highlight social media platforms’ ...
- Australia warned to not ignore domestic misinformation in social media crackdownon June 21, 2020 at 11:44 pm
Committee has been warned against outsourcing the job of deciding what is true or false in an Australian context to a handful of private US companies.
- Conflicting COVID Messages Create Cloud of Confusion Around Public Health and Preventionon June 19, 2020 at 7:06 am
The pandemic is marked by a significant amount of misinformation – some spread on purpose – that could prove deadly.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- COVID-19 has exacerbated the historical neglect of dignified mental health care, especially for those in institutions: UN experton June 23, 2020 at 10:55 am
"These are exacerbated by massive attacks of disinformation ... anxiety and mental health issues, the expert said. "This is especially worrying given the overall lack of recognition and awareness ...
- What You can Do About Disinformationon June 23, 2020 at 7:22 am
This ‘infodemic’ didn’t emerge in a vacuum though. For years, digital disinformation has been a growing problem, with the potential to seriously harm public health and our democracy. But can we do ...
- Australia-China Tensions: Foreign Minister Blasts Beijing For Coronavirus 'Disinformation'on June 23, 2020 at 5:20 am
Marise Payne spoke about Beijing and Moscow running a campaign of disinformation about recent racial incidents involving Chinese students in Australia.
- Experts renew calls for a government body to tackle foreign disinformationon June 22, 2020 at 7:42 pm
Select Committee hears testimony that no one in government thinks they own the problem of countering misinformation on social media.
- Brazil congress moving forward disinformation bill that brings free expression and privacy harms to new levelson June 22, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Brazilian senators are expected to vote this Thursday, June 25, on a bill aiming to curb the spread of misinformation that require ID registration to access and use social media in the country, among ...