New data on first-in-U.S. trial sheds new light on success of gene editing and cell function
Genetically-edited immune cells can persist, thrive, and function months after a cancer patient receives them, according to new data published by researchers from the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and Penn’s Abramson Cancer Center. The team showed cells removed from patients and brought back into the lab setting were able to kill cancer months after their original manufacturing and infusion. Further analysis of these cells confirmed they were successfully edited in three specific ways, marking the first-ever sanctioned investigational use of multiple edits to the human genome. This is the first U.S. clinical trial to test the gene editing approach in humans, and the publication of this new data today in Science follows on the initial report last year that researchers were able to use CRISPR/Cas9 technology to successfully edit three cancer patients’ immune cells. Penn is conducting the ongoing study in cooperation with the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Tmunity Therapeutics.
“Our data from the first three patients enrolled in this clinical trial demonstrate two important things that, to our knowledge, no one has ever shown before. First, we can successfully perform multiple edits with precision during manufacturing, with the resulting cells surviving longer in the human body than any previously published data have shown. Second, thus far, these cells have shown a sustained ability to attack and kill tumors,” said Carl June, MD, the Richard W. Vague Professor in Immunotherapy and director of the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies in the Abramson Cancer Center and director of the Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy at the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania and the study’s senior author.
The findings are the latest milestone in Penn’s history as cellular and gene therapy pioneers, including development of the first FDA-approved CAR T cell therapy, Kymriah, for pediatric and adult blood cancer patients.
Patients on this trial were treated by Edward A. Stadtmauer, MD, section chief of Hematologic Malignancies at Penn, who is the co-lead author on the study along with Joseph A. Fraietta, PhD, an assistant professor of Microbiology at Penn. The co-senior author is Simon F. Lacey, PhD, director of the Translational and Correlative Studies Laboratory in the Center for Cellular Immunotherapies.
The approach in this study is closely related to CAR T cell therapy, in which patient immune cells are engineered to fight cancer, but it has some key differences. Just like CAR T, researchers in this study began by collecting a patient’s T cells from blood. However, instead of arming these cells with a receptor against a protein such as CD19, the team first used CRISPR/Cas9 editing to remove three genes. The first two edits removed a T cell’s natural receptors so they can be reprogrammed to express a synthetic T cell receptor, allowing these cells to seek out and destroy tumors. The third edit removed PD-1, a natural checkpoint that sometimes blocks T cells from doing their job.
“This new analysis of the three patients has confirmed that the manufactured cells contained all three edits, providing proof of concept for this approach. This is the first confirmation of the ability of CRISPR/Cas9 technology to target multiple genes at the same time in humans and illustrates the potential of this technology to treat many diseases that were previously not able to be treated or cured,” June said.
Once the three genes are knocked out, a fourth genetic modification was accomplished using a lentivirus to insert the cancer-specific synthetic T cell receptor, which tells the edited T cells to target an antigen called NY-ESO-1. Previously published data show these cells typically survive for less than a week, but this new analysis shows the edited cells used in this study persisted, with the longest follow up at nine months.
Several months after the infusion, researchers drew more blood and isolated the CRISPR-edited cells for study. When brought back into the lab setting, the cells were still able to kill tumors.
“Previous studies have shown these cells lose function within days, so the fact that the CRISPR-edited cells in this study retained anti-tumor function for a significantly longer period of time after a single infusion is very encouraging,” June said.
The CRISPR-edited T cells used in this study are not active on their own like CAR T cells. Instead, they require the cooperation of a molecule known as HLA-A*02:01, which is only expressed in a subset of patients. This means that patients had to be screened ahead of time to make sure they were a match for the approach. Participants who met the requirements received other clinically-indicated therapy as needed while they waited for their cells to be manufactured. Once that process was completed, all three patients received the gene-edited cells in a single infusion after a short course of chemotherapy. Analysis of blood samples revealed that all three participants had the CRISPR-edited T cells take root and thrive in the patients. While none responded to the therapy, there were no treatment-related serious adverse events.
CRISPR technology has not previously been tested in humans in the U.S. Investigators at Penn have pioneered a number of other “first uses” of engineered T cells over the past decade. Even with that experience, moving this work into the clinic while ensuring appropriate patient safeguards meant the research team had to move through a comprehensive and rigorous series of institutional and federal regulatory approval steps, including approval by the National Institutes of Health’s Recombinant DNA Research Advisory Committee and review by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, as well as Penn’s institutional review board and institutional biosafety committee. The entire process required more than two years.
Researchers say these new data will open the door to later stage studies to investigate and extend this approach to a broader field beyond cancer, several of which are already planned at Penn.
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Genetically-edited immune cells
- Iovance Biotherapeutics: Buy The Dipon March 13, 2020 at 7:52 am
Shares of cell therapy pioneer Iovance Biotherapeutics (IOVA ... to develop tumor infiltrating lymphocytes that have been genetically edited to create more potent cancer therapeutics. This step ...
- CRISPR-Cas9: Should we be able to edit our genes?on March 12, 2020 at 5:08 pm
Variations in genomes arise due to internal cell processes, such as mistakes made when copying DNA ... In November 2018, He Jiankui presented results of his work in creating ‘genetically edited babies ...
- Possible Cures. Mystery Deaths. Daunting Costs. Can CAR-T Be Tamed?on March 12, 2020 at 5:00 pm
For example, JCAR017 is made of a precise ratio of two T cell types; one is an active killer and the other is more a helper in the overall immune ... cells are genetically edited to be alemtuzumab ...
- Germline News and Researchon March 1, 2020 at 4:00 pm
He had helped create the world’s first genetically edited ... journal Cell, scientists have found that koala DNA is protected against attack by retroviruses by a special type of immune response ...
- Iovance Biotherapeutics Reports Fourth Quarter and Full-Year 2019 Financial Results and Provides Corporate Update - MarketWatchon February 25, 2020 at 8:01 am
Search MarketWatch Home Latest News Watchlist Markets U.S. Markets Canada Europe & Middle East Asia Emerging Markets Latin America Market Data ...
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Genetically-edited immune cells
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- ‘Mini’ U6 Pol III promoter exhibits nucleosome redundancy and supports multiplexed coupling of CRISPR/Cas9 effectson March 20, 2020 at 8:19 am
RNA polymerase III (Pol III) promoters express short non-coding RNAs and have been adopted for expression of microRNA, interference RNA, and CRISPR single guide RNA (sgRNA). Vectors incorporating H1 ...
- Cas-CLOVER: The Clean Alternative to CRISPR-Cas9on March 19, 2020 at 8:01 am
The potential that gene-editing technology possesses is immense. Due to its ease of use and high efficiency, the CRISPR-Cas9 system is rapidly becoming the prevalent system for the genetic ...
- Better Buy: CRISPR Therapeutics vs. Sangamo Bioscienceson March 19, 2020 at 7:11 am
CRISPR Therapeutics (NASDAQ:CRSP) and Sangamo Biosciences (NASDAQ:SGMO) are two leaders of a new wave of drug development that's based on manipulating genes. These biotechs use tools to remove, edit, ...
- Yep. They Injected CRISPR Into An Eyeballon March 19, 2020 at 1:00 am
It's no exaggeration to say the gene-editing technique CRISPR could revolutionize medicine. We look at a new milestone — a CRISPR treatment that edits a patient's DNA while it's still inside their ...
- CRISPR-Cas9 Variant More Specific after Swapping One Amino Acidon March 18, 2020 at 3:00 pm
Otherwise, slip-ups are bound to happen, and you’ll mar your work—whether you’re performing carpentry or editing the genome. In the case of CRISPR-Cas9 genome editing, the equivalent of a steady hand ...