Car welding line with robots welders
The consequences of workplace automation will likely impact just about every aspect of our lives, and scholars and policymakers need to start thinking about it far more broadly if they want to have a say in what the future looks like, according to a new paper co-authored by a Cornell researcher.
“Mostly, people in our field wait until technology is implemented in a workplace to study it. And then we go in and say, ‘How is work different?’” said Diane Bailey, the Geri Gay Professor of Communication in the College of Agriculture and Life Sciences. “But faced with a technology that has the potential to disrupt the landscape of work in such a universal way, immediately and simultaneously, we felt like we have to get in the barn before the horse leaves.”
The paper, “Beyond Design and Use: How Scholars Should Study Intelligent Design Technologies,” was published in December in Information and Organization. Bailey co-authored the study with Stephen Barley, the Christian A. Felipe Professor of Technology Management in the College of Engineering at the University of California, Santa Barbara.
According to the paper, past examples of new technology suggest it will take longer than companies predict for workplaces to become fully transformed by AI, and some jobs might not be as easily replaceable as economists believe. This means researchers have more time to gain a deeper understanding of how workplace automation will affect society, in order to have more say in how it unfolds.
Fully understanding workplace automation, the researchers said, requires an interdisciplinary approach that considers everything from the power dynamics within tech companies to the design of our societal institutions. At Cornell, Bailey and Martin Wells, the Charles A. Alexander Professor of Statistical Sciences and chair of the Department of Statistics and Data Science, are heading a core team of nine other researchers from eight departments to follow this cross-disciplinary roadmap. The group is currently seeking funding to plan the creation of an institute to study AI and work.
In the paper, Bailey and Barley identified four factors scholars should study in order to assess AI’s future impact: variation; power; ideology; and institutions.
Considering variety among jobs is important, Bailey said, because not all jobs – even in the same fields – are identical. Researchers generally use U.S. Department of Labor databases to predict how automation might affect certain job categories, but most studies don’t consider differences in implementation, skills, tasks and work practices across organizations or locations.
Because designers and engineers don’t function independently, power is another crucial factor, the paper said. Which AI technologies are pursued and how aggressively they’re implemented depends on the dynamics within companies, as well as the priorities of the government entities that might fund or regulate those companies.
The ideology of design can provide insight into how technologists create new systems, Bailey said. According to the paper, the AI community often approaches design with its own culture, potentially emphasizing technical over social aspects. This could mean that some systems that are predicted to replace humans might still require them, though possibly in different roles.
“We have to understand how all of these market mechanisms operate if we’re going to be savvy enough to work in that world and say, ‘No, we want technology that looks like this’ [or] ‘Design something that operates this way,’” Bailey said. “We need to work backwards from some desired future that we want, to get the technologies that will help us get there.”
Researchers also need to consider the potential impacts of automation – and the widespread unemployment it will likely bring – on our institutions, the paper said. For example, Bailey said, being home together all day – without the demands and concrete rewards of a paid job – could strain marriages and families. Roads, highways and transit systems that were designed to move people from home to work will need to be reconsidered.
“Maybe the reasons our neighborhoods work well is that so many of us are away from them during the day,” Bailey said. “We might have to rethink all of these things – and that’s what the paper argues we should do.”
Researchers and policymakers also need to weigh the societal benefits of work, in order to make informed decisions about which jobs are worth saving.
“We have to think about what aspects of work have meaning and value to us,” Bailey said. “We might decide, ‘Maybe AI can do this better than a person, but we don’t care, because we get some value out of it.’”
The Latest Updates from Bing News & Google News
Go deeper with Bing News on:
- Australian Business Leaders Embrace Intelligent Automation to Accelerate Productivity and Drive Business Transformationon June 23, 2020 at 3:46 pm
Service Business Users to Achieve Immediate Benefits Delivering new insights into the future of work, today Blue Prism, (AIM: PRSM) announced the findings of its annual global survey in a report ...
- CMS says it wants to cut red tape for docs. It just created an 'Office of Burden Reduction'on June 23, 2020 at 2:39 pm
With a focus on health informatics, the dedicated office also will work to foster innovation through interoperability. It will take the lead on using technology and automation to create new tools that ...
- Home smart home: Apple reveals new home automation, control features coming in iOS 14on June 23, 2020 at 12:18 pm
based tech giant discussed Monday at its first online-only event, iOS 14 will work hand in hand with Apple’s HomeKit ... Apple is looking to take a bigger bite out of smart home automation and control ...
- Forrester: Organizations' Workforce Strategies Are Not Ready For The Future Of Workon June 23, 2020 at 7:20 am
According to the guide, the coronavirus pandemic is an acute symptom of a larger set of factors that were already poised to alter the way work gets done. In fact, four "shocks" to enterprises — ...
- How the rise of automation can inform our upskilling during the pandemicon June 23, 2020 at 6:48 am
To see how workers have overhauled their skills in the past, look to the influx of skills from the previous explosion of machine and process technology.
Go deeper with Google Headlines on:
Go deeper with Bing News on:
Intelligent design technologies
- Siemens acquires UltraSoC to drive design for silicon lifecycle managementon June 23, 2020 at 9:49 am
Siemens has signed an agreement to acquire Cambridge, UK-based UltraSoC Technologies Ltd., a provider of instrumentation and analytics solutions that put intelligent monitoring, ...
- Keysight Technologies to Showcase Data Center Interconnect Test Solutions at Optical Networking Innovations Eventon June 23, 2020 at 8:00 am
Keysight Technologies to Showcase Data Center Interconnect Test Solutions at Optical Networking Innovations Event ...
- Jemez Technology Announces Name Change to Evolonon June 23, 2020 at 7:43 am
Jemez Technology, a leading global provider of perimeter surveillance solutions for critical asset and infrastructure protection, today announced it is changing its name to Evolon. The company’s new ...
- IBM and SAP Announce New Offerings to Help Companies' Journey to the Intelligent Enterpriseon June 23, 2020 at 7:00 am
PRNewswire/ -- IBM (NYSE: IBM) and SAP SE (NYSE: SAP) today announced their partnership's next evolution, with plans to develop several new offerings ...
- ASSA ABLOY’s CLIQ technology provides an intelligent access control solution for public serviceson June 21, 2020 at 11:59 pm
Resilience and efficiency have become watchwords for public institutions, before, during and after the ongoing health crisis (COVD-19 pandemic outbreak). In delivering services fit for the ...