One study says coffee is good for you, while another study says that it’s not. They’re both right, within context. This dichotomy together with an environment of distrust spurred by anecdotes, fake news, and to a large extent, social media, has created a skeptical and misinformed public.
As a result, researchers from Florida Atlantic University’s Schmidt College of Medicine and collaborators say society is rejecting the facts. Now more than ever, medical researchers must help the public understand the rigorous process of science, which has been around for thousands of years. In return, the public has to pay attention, realize that one size doesn’t fit all, and understand that the answers are not just black or white. Lives are depending on it.
In an article published in the American Journal of Medicine , the researchers highlight opportunities for academic institutions to achieve and maintain research integrity, which encompasses accountability for all scientific and financial issues, including human subjects’ and animal protections, investigator accountability, grant submission, design, conduct, analyses, and interpretation of findings, oversight of colleagues and students, environmental health and safety, among others. Research integrity focuses on the many positive attributes that should be sought and maintained by academic institutions as well as their faculty, staff, and trainees. This includes transparency, rigor, and reproducibility.
The best way for medical researchers to meet this challenge is by continuing to ensure integrity, rigor, reproducibility and replication of their science and to earn the public’s trust by being morally responsible and completely free of any influences. Medical researchers have a passion for truth and discovery, therefore, integrity and trust are essential attributes.
“The reason that the public has lost trust and confidence in science is multifaceted and complicated,” said Janet Robishaw, Ph.D., senior author, senior associate dean for research, and chair of the Department of Biomedical Science in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, and a member of the FAU Brain Institute (I-BRAIN), one of the University’s four research pillars. “One of the main reasons is anecdotal stories, which can be very powerful, and are being given too much weight. There’s so much news coming out from so many sources including social media. That’s why it’s imperative for the public to discern an anecdote from scientific results in a peer-reviewed journal. This is how the premise that vaccinations cause autism evolved along with fabricated results that pushed the anti-vaccination movement.”
Robishaw and corresponding author Charles H. Hennekens, M.D., Dr.PH, first Sir Richard Doll Professor and senior academic advisor in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, stress that research integrity starts with investigators who share the guiding principles of honesty, openness, and accountability and who provide scientific and ethical mentorship to their trainees. As researchers compete for increasingly limited resources and face growing challenges with evolving technologies, broad consensus is required across the research enterprise, including funding agencies, medical journals as well as all academic institutions, to address these increasingly major clinical, ethical and legal challenges.
“Our common goal should be to return public trust in our research enterprise, which has done so much good for so many,” said Robishaw. “The more we can do as scientists to promote our guiding principles of rigor, transparency, honesty and reproducibility and to provide the best evidence possible and get people to understand them, the greater the likelihood that they will listen to the message and follow it.”
Among the opportunities the authors provide for enhancing research integrity include identifying the best benchmarking practices, establishing a research compliance infrastructure and implementing a quality assurance plan. These priorities should include assessing the research climate, developing policies and responsibilities for ethics investigations, and providing a process for resolution of formal disputes. In addition, establishing lists of independent experts to conduct periodic reviews of institutional procedures could be helpful. Reinforcing existing regulatory policies that include emails regarding grant routing and regulatory policies, and providing both formal and informal training to faculty, staff, and trainees are other suggestions the authors provide.
“We should not allow research misconduct committed by a very small minority of researchers to detract from the growing focus on efforts to improve the overall quality of the research process carried out by the vast majority,” said Hennekens. “I continue to believe that the overwhelming majority of researchers strive for and achieve scientific excellence and research integrity.”
In conclusion, the authors, which include David L. DeMets, Ph.D., professor emeritus, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health; Sarah K. Wood, M.D., senior associate dean for medical education, and Phillip Boiselle, M.D., dean, both in FAU’s Schmidt College of Medicine, emphasize that research integrity requires synchronicity and collaboration between as well as within all academic institutions.
“If we fail to maintain research integrity we will lose public trust and it will lead to avoidable consequences of substantial penalties, financial and otherwise, adverse publicity and reputational damage,” said Robishaw. “Scientists must strive to self-regulate and earn public trust to advance health.”
The Latest on: Society is rejecting facts
via Google News
The Latest on: Society is rejecting facts
- The Body of Knowledge Mindful Coach Company Offers A Novel Approach on Creating Awareness on the Human Anatomy and Mental Wellbeingon January 31, 2020 at 4:40 pm
These well-balanced posts also offer in-depth knowledge on scientifically proven facts on mental wellbeing and how it impacts oneself and society at large. In addition to imparting knowledge ... The ...
- Voting to acquit this noxious criminal is the point of no return for the Republican Partyon January 31, 2020 at 2:37 pm
Some will point out, correctly, that the strain of reality-free conspiracy-mongering that defines the Donald Trump presidency dates back at least to the era of Joseph McCarthy and the John Birch ...
- 500 Years and Counting: Why the World Is Still Terrified by Machiavellion January 30, 2020 at 6:10 pm
Machiavelli’s originality—and the source of his enduring, if notorious, reputation—was his blatant rejection of traditional morality as a guide to political ... at times requiring actions to preserve ...
- The 1619 Project Depicts an America Tainted by Original Sinon January 30, 2020 at 1:25 pm
This chardonnay wisdom will be considered as unquestionable in polite society as climate change ... is actually a rejection of history in favor of what we might call lore. The attraction of ...
- Hernandez-Chacon v. Barron January 28, 2020 at 8:00 pm
“Questions of law, as well as the application of legal principles to undisputed facts, are reviewed de novo ... but it does not discuss whether women who reject the sexual advances of gang members are ...
- Opinion: Yes, public education is hard. Stop trying to dismantle JCPS and work with uson January 28, 2020 at 8:33 am
If you are black, brown, poor, hungry or dealing with the countless types of trauma society inflicts on our youth, you will struggle. That is the reality of American public education in 2020. Though I ...
- Reject anti-immigration rhetoricon January 1, 2020 at 4:06 am
Taken for granted are the facts that no ... productive members of society and their customs and beliefs will bring diversity to our nation. It’s time we finally reject the rhetoric and accept ...
- Why Evangelicals Are Hardwired to Believe Certain Falsehoodson December 31, 2019 at 6:48 am
Given its negative impact on society, it is important to understand ... it takes more mental effort to reject an idea as false than to accept it as true. In other words, it’s easier to believe ...
- A neuroscientist explains why Christian evangelicals are wired to believe Donald Trump’s gaslighting lieson December 29, 2019 at 4:54 am
Not only does Trump regularly exaggerate the truth, he frequently denies facts that can be observed ... Given its negative impact on society, it is important to understand why certain groups ...
- Society is rejecting facts; medical researchers can helpon October 16, 2019 at 6:02 am
As a result, researchers from Florida Atlantic University's Schmidt College of Medicine and collaborators say society is rejecting the facts. Now more than ever, medical researchers must help the ...
via Bing News