Researchers from Sweden, Germany, Brazil and the USA have developed a financial mechanism to support the protection of the world’s natural heritage.
In a recent study, they developed three different design options for an intergovernmental biodiversity financing mechanism. Asking what would happen if money was given to countries for providing protected areas, they simulated where the money would flow, what type of incentives this would create – and how these incentives would align with international conservation goals.
After long negotiations, the international community has agreed to safeguard the global ecosystems and improve on the status of biodiversity. The global conservation goals for 2020, called the Aichi targets, are an ambitious hallmark. Yet, effective implementation is largely lacking. Biodiversity is still dwindling at rates only comparable to the last planetary mass extinction. Additional effort is required to reach the Aichi targets and even more so to halt biodiversity loss.
“Human well-being depends on ecological life support. Yet, we are constantly losing biodiversity and therefore the resilience of ecosystems. At the international level, there are political goals, but the implementation of conservation policies is a national task. There is no global financial mechanism that can help nations to reach their biodiversity targets”, says lead author Nils Droste from Lund University, Sweden.
Brazil has successfully implemented Ecological Fiscal Transfer systems that compensate municipalities for hosting protected areas at a local level since the early 1990’s. According to previous findings, such mechanisms help to create additional protected areas. The international research team has therefore set out to scale this idea up to the global level where not municipalities but nations are in charge of designating protected areas. They developed and compared three different design options:
An ecocentric model: where only protected area extent per country counts – the bigger the protected area, the better;
A socio-ecological model: where protected areas and Human Development Index count, adding development justice to the previous model;
An anthropocentric model: where population density is also considered, as people benefit locally from protected areas.
The socio-ecological design was the one that proved to be the most efficient. The model provided the highest marginal incentives – that is, the most additional money for protecting an additional percent of a country’s area – for countries that are the farthest from reaching the global conservation goals. The result surprised the researchers.
“While we developed the socio-ecological design with a fairness element in mind, believing that developing countries might be more easily convinced by a design that benefits them, we were surprised how well this particular design aligns with the global policy goals”, says Nils Droste. “It would most strongly incentivize additional conservation action where the global community is lacking it the most”, he adds.
As the study was aimed at providing options, not prescriptions for policy makers, the study did not detail who should be paying or how large the fund should exactly be. Rather, it provides a yet unexplored option to develop a financial mechanism for biodiversity conservation akin to what the Green Climate Fund is for climate change.
“We know that we need to change land use in order to preserve biodiversity. Protecting land from degradation and providing healthy ecosystems, clean air or clean rivers is a function of the state. Giving a financial reward to governments for such public ecosystem services will ease the provision of corresponding conservation efforts and will help to put this on the agenda”, concludes Nils Droste.
The Latest on: Biodiversity
via Google News
The Latest on: Biodiversity
- UW’s Biodiversity Institute Seeks Community Scientists for Short-Eared Owl Surveys This Springon January 22, 2020 at 8:51 am
The University of Wyoming’s Biodiversity Institute is seeking volunteers to participate in short-eared owl surveys throughout the state this spring. (Photo courtesy of allaboutbirds.org) Hoot. Hoot.
- Cities and Biodiversity Outlook - Action and Policyon January 21, 2020 at 8:07 am
CBO – Action and Policy provides the summary of a global assessment of the links between urbanization, biodiversity, and ecosystem services. Drawing on contributions from more than 120 scientists and ...
- Oceans, biodiversity, deforestation: what's on the climate agenda for 2020?on January 20, 2020 at 11:00 pm
This year could be crucial in determining the response to the environmental crises ...
- Can ecosystems recover from dramatic losses of biodiversity?on January 20, 2020 at 6:51 am
Unsurprisingly, given the shocking numbers of animals that must have perished as a result of these wildfires, many are questioning whether burned ecosystems can recover from such dramatic losses of ...
- On the edge between science and art: Historical biodiversity data from Japanese 'gyotaku'on January 19, 2020 at 11:59 pm
Historical biodiversity data is being obtained from museum specimens, literature, classic monographs and old photographs, yet those sources can be damaged, lost or not completely adequate. That brings ...
- Humans risk living in an empty world, warns UN biodiversity chiefon January 19, 2020 at 11:00 pm
Ahead of the World Economic Forum, Elizabeth Maruma Mrema urges governments to take definitive action on climate, deforestation and pollution ...
- U.N. biodiversity plan calls for protecting 30% of Earth by 2030on January 19, 2020 at 4:11 am
The draft plan, released Monday by the U.N. Convention on Biological Diversity, outlines a path for combating the biodiversity crisis that many scientists say is the start of Earth’s sixth mass ...
- Human ancestors started biodiversity decline millions of years agoon January 17, 2020 at 9:55 am
The human-caused biodiversity decline started much earlier than researchers used to believe. According to a new study the process was not started by our own species but by some of our ancestors. The ...
- UN Warns Biodiversity At Risk Due to Climate Changeon January 16, 2020 at 5:10 pm
A new report from the United Nations states that we have 10 years to save Earth's biodiversity from mass extinction. Rebecca Shaw, Chief Scientist with the World Wildlife Fund, joined us to discuss ...
- UN says "urgent action" needed to protect Earth's biodiversityon January 15, 2020 at 2:02 pm
By stabilizing the planet's vulnerable biodiversity by 2030, the proposal aims to "ensure that, by 2050, the shared vision of living in harmony with nature is fulfilled." The U.N. Convention on ...
via Bing News