Researchers from Sweden, Germany, Brazil and the USA have developed a financial mechanism to support the protection of the world’s natural heritage.
In a recent study, they developed three different design options for an intergovernmental biodiversity financing mechanism. Asking what would happen if money was given to countries for providing protected areas, they simulated where the money would flow, what type of incentives this would create – and how these incentives would align with international conservation goals.
After long negotiations, the international community has agreed to safeguard the global ecosystems and improve on the status of biodiversity. The global conservation goals for 2020, called the Aichi targets, are an ambitious hallmark. Yet, effective implementation is largely lacking. Biodiversity is still dwindling at rates only comparable to the last planetary mass extinction. Additional effort is required to reach the Aichi targets and even more so to halt biodiversity loss.
“Human well-being depends on ecological life support. Yet, we are constantly losing biodiversity and therefore the resilience of ecosystems. At the international level, there are political goals, but the implementation of conservation policies is a national task. There is no global financial mechanism that can help nations to reach their biodiversity targets”, says lead author Nils Droste from Lund University, Sweden.
Brazil has successfully implemented Ecological Fiscal Transfer systems that compensate municipalities for hosting protected areas at a local level since the early 1990’s. According to previous findings, such mechanisms help to create additional protected areas. The international research team has therefore set out to scale this idea up to the global level where not municipalities but nations are in charge of designating protected areas. They developed and compared three different design options:
An ecocentric model: where only protected area extent per country counts – the bigger the protected area, the better;
A socio-ecological model: where protected areas and Human Development Index count, adding development justice to the previous model;
An anthropocentric model: where population density is also considered, as people benefit locally from protected areas.
The socio-ecological design was the one that proved to be the most efficient. The model provided the highest marginal incentives – that is, the most additional money for protecting an additional percent of a country’s area – for countries that are the farthest from reaching the global conservation goals. The result surprised the researchers.
“While we developed the socio-ecological design with a fairness element in mind, believing that developing countries might be more easily convinced by a design that benefits them, we were surprised how well this particular design aligns with the global policy goals”, says Nils Droste. “It would most strongly incentivize additional conservation action where the global community is lacking it the most”, he adds.
As the study was aimed at providing options, not prescriptions for policy makers, the study did not detail who should be paying or how large the fund should exactly be. Rather, it provides a yet unexplored option to develop a financial mechanism for biodiversity conservation akin to what the Green Climate Fund is for climate change.
“We know that we need to change land use in order to preserve biodiversity. Protecting land from degradation and providing healthy ecosystems, clean air or clean rivers is a function of the state. Giving a financial reward to governments for such public ecosystem services will ease the provision of corresponding conservation efforts and will help to put this on the agenda”, concludes Nils Droste.
The Latest on: Biodiversity
via Google News
The Latest on: Biodiversity
- Good for biodiversityon May 9, 2020 at 9:31 pm
The emergence of coronavirus too could be traced back to the upsetting of biodiversity ...
- EU aims to ring-fence ‘old-growth forests’ in new biodiversity planon May 8, 2020 at 4:29 am
At least 10% of land – considerably more than the current 3% – will have to be declared “strictly protected areas” under a new EU biodiversity strategy due to be unveiled later this month.
- Preserving biodiversity: Govt plans to revive small rivers, canals, wetlandson May 7, 2020 at 11:36 pm
The government has taken a massive plan to recover canals, wetlands and small rivers across the country and re-excavate those to increase their navigability and water reservation capacity, groundwater ...
- Destruction of habitat and loss of biodiversity are creating the perfect conditions for diseases like COVID-19 to emergeon May 7, 2020 at 6:56 am
There’s misapprehension among scientists and the public that natural ecosystems are the source of threats to ourselves. It’s a mistake," said scientist Richard Ostfeld. "Nature poses threats, it is ...
- Microsoft is building a ‘Planetary Computer’ to protect biodiversityon May 5, 2020 at 1:08 pm
I think that’s actually one of the lessons, the real reminders, if you will, of the year 2020, as we all live every day with the issues obviously created by COVID-19," observed Microsoft President ...
- Quantifying biodiversity trade-offs in the face of widespread renewable and unconventional energy developmenton May 5, 2020 at 2:26 am
The challenge of balancing biodiversity protection with economic growth is epitomized by the development of renewable and unconventional energy, whose adoption is aimed at stemming the impacts of ...
- In ocean biodiversity hotspots, microplastics come with the currentson May 4, 2020 at 1:00 pm
The most common microplastic found in the ocean is microfibers from textiles, which enters the ocean through domestic and industrial waste water systems. The study suggests that microplastics are ...
- As bioethanol demand rises, biodiversity will fall in Cerrado, study sayson May 4, 2020 at 12:19 pm
An area half the size of Switzerland in Brazil’s Cerrado biome could see its biodiversity plummet as sugarcane farms expand to meet global demand for bioethanol, a new study says. Researchers ...
- Temperature-related biodiversity change across temperate marine and terrestrial systemson May 4, 2020 at 8:25 am
Biodiversity time series from temperate regions reveal that marine communities in warmer places gain species but lose individuals with warming, but colder environments show weaker trends, whereas no ...
- L.A. County’s biodiversity is on the map, thanks to UCLA researcherson April 30, 2020 at 9:50 am
The online atlas supports efforts to better understand the region’s habitats, which could influence global conservation efforts.
via Bing News