A world-record result in reducing errors in semiconductor electron ‘spin qubits’, a type of building block for quantum computers, has been achieved using the theoretical work of quantum physicists at the University of Sydney Nano Institute and School of Physics.
The experimental result by UNSW engineers demonstrated error rates as low as 0.043 percent, lower than any other electron spin qubit. The joint research paper by the Sydney and UNSW teams was published this week in Nature Electronics and is the journal’s cover story for April.
“Reducing errors in quantum computers is needed before they can be scaled up into useful machines,” said Professor Stephen Bartlett, a corresponding author of the paper.
“Once they operate at scale, quantum computers could deliver on their great promise to solve problems beyond the capacity of even the largest supercomputers. This could help humanity solve problems in chemistry, drug design and industry.”
There are many types of quantum bits, or qubits, ranging from those using trapped ions, superconducting loops or photons. A ‘spin qubit’ is a quantum bit that encodes information based on the quantised magnetic direction of a quantum object, such as an electron.
Australia, and Sydney in particular, is emerging as a global leader in quantum technology. The recent announcement to fund the establishment of a Sydney Quantum Academy, underlines the huge opportunity in Australia to build a quantum economy based on the world’s largest concentration of quantum research groups here in Sydney.
No practice without theory
While much of the recent focus in quantum computing has been on advances in hardware, none of these advances have been possible without the development of quantum information theory.
The University of Sydney quantum theory group, led by Professor Stephen Bartlett and Professor Steven Flammia, is one of the world powerhouses of quantum information theory, allowing for engineering and experimental teams across the globe make the painstaking physical advances needed to ensure quantum computing becomes a reality.
The work of the Sydney quantum theory group was essential for the world-record result published in Nature Electronics.
Professor Bartlett said: “Because the error rate was so small, the UNSW team needed some pretty sophisticated methods to even be able to detect the errors.
“With such low error rates, we needed data runs that went for days and days just to collect the statistics to show the occasional error.”
Professor Bartlett said once the errors were identified they needed to be characterised, eliminated and recharacterised.
“Steve Flammia’s group are world leaders in the theory of error characterisation, which was used to achieve this result,” he said.
The Flammia group recently demonstrated for the first time an improvement in quantum computers using codes designed to detect and discard errors in the logic gates, or switches, using the IBM Q quantum computer.
Professor Andrew Dzurak, who leads the UNSW research team, said: “It’s been invaluable working with professors Bartlett and Flammia, and their team, to help us understand the types of errors that we see in our silicon-CMOS qubits at UNSW.
“Our lead experimentalist, Henry Yang, worked closely with them to achieve this remarkable fidelity of 99.957 percent, showing that we now have the most accurate semiconductor qubit in the world.”
Professor Bartlett said that Henry Yang’s world-record achievement will likely stand for a long time. He said now the UNSW team and others will work on building up towards two qubit and higher-level arrays in silicon-CMOS.
Fully functioning quantum computers will need millions, if not billions, of qubits to operate. Designing low-error qubits now is a vital step to scaling up to such devices.
Professor Raymond Laflamme is Chair of Quantum Information at the University of Waterloo in Canada and was not involved in the study. He said: “As quantum processors become more common, an important tool to assess them has been developed by the Bartlett group at the University of Sydney. It allows us to characterise the precision of quantum gates and gives physicists the ability to distinguish between incoherent and coherent errors leading to unprecedented control of the qubits.”
The joint University of Sydney-UNSW result comes soon after a paper by the same quantum theory team with experimentalists at the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen.
That result, published in Nature Communications, allows for the distant exchange of information between electrons via a mediator, improving the prospects for a scaled-up architecture in spin-qubit quantum computers.
The result was significant because it allows for the distance between quantum dots to be large enough for integration into more traditional microelectronics. The achievement was a joint endeavour by physicists in Copenhagen, Sydney and Purdue in the US.
Professor Bartlett said: “The main problem is that to get the quantum dots to interact requires them to be ridiculously close – nanometres apart. But at this distance they interfere with each other, making the device too difficult to tune to conduct useful calculations.”
The solution was to allow entangled electrons to mediate their information via a ‘pool’ of electrons, moving them further apart.
He said: “It is kind of like having a bus – a big mediator that allows for the interaction of distant spins. If you can allow for more spin interactions, then quantum architecture can move to two-dimensional layouts.”
Associate Professor Ferdinand Kuemmeth from the Niels Bohr Institute in Copenhagen said: “We discovered that a large, elongated quantum dot between the left dots and right dots, mediated a coherent swap of spin states, within a billionth of a second, without ever moving electrons out of their dots.
Professor Bartlett said: “What I find exciting about this result as a theorist, is that it frees us from the constraining geometry of a qubit only relying on its nearest neighbours.”
Office of Global Engagement
The history of this experiment goes back a decade to an US Intelligence Advanced Research Projects Activity (IARPA) program led by Professor Charlie Marcus, a co-author who was then at Harvard before he moved to Copenhagen.
Professor Bartlett said: “We all went to Copenhagen for a workshop in 2018 in part to work on this problem. Thomas Evans, a co-author of the paper, stayed there for two months supported by the Office for Global Engagement. OGE also supported Dr Arne Grimsmo, who was working on another project.”
He said the experiment and our discussions were well advanced by the time we got the OGE funding. But it was this workshop and the funding for it that allowed the Sydney team to go to Copenhagen to plan the next generation of experiments based on this result.
Professor Bartlett said: “This method allows us to separate the quantum dots a bit further making them easier to tune separately and get them working together.
“Now that we have this mediator, we can start to plan for a two-dimensional array of these pairs of quantum dots.”
The Latest on: Quantum computing
via Google News
The Latest on: Quantum computing
- Atos partners with Zapata to deliver complete quantum computing solution to the enterpriseon November 18, 2019 at 4:04 pm
PARIS and IRVING, Texas, Nov. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Atos, a global leader in digital transformation, and US-based Zapata Computing Inc., a leading enterprise software company for quantum ...
- The quantum supremacy enigma: Can Google’s claim withstand scrutiny?on November 18, 2019 at 2:18 pm
If quantum computing is ever to transcend the realm of experiment and become a legitimate industry, it will need to sustain a legitimate business model. Businesses invest in machines and technologies ...
- Atos Partners with Zapata to Deliver Quantum Computing Solution to the Enterpriseon November 18, 2019 at 9:21 am
PARIS and IRVING, Texas, Nov. 18, 2019 — Atos, a global leader in digital transformation, and US-based Zapata Computing Inc., a leading enterprise software company for quantum applications, today ...
- Quantum computers learn to mark their own workon November 18, 2019 at 6:05 am
A new test to check if a quantum computer is giving correct answers to questions beyond the scope of traditional computing could help the first quantum computer that can outperform a classical ...
- Cambridge Quantum Computing Announces New Release of Updated Software Stack t|ket ™on November 17, 2019 at 3:31 pm
t|ket provides essential tools that allow users to maximise the performance of quantum computers in the NISQ era CAMBRIDGE, England, Nov. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- Cambridge Quantum Computing ("CQC") ...
- Here’s How Quantum Computer Supremacy Will Impact Self-Driving Carson November 16, 2019 at 10:01 am
That’s not to say that the use of their 54-qubit Sycamore processor wasn’t notable, and in fact, does provide another handy stride toward achieving viable quantum computing, but whether it was the ...
- D-Wave sticks with its approach to quantum computingon November 15, 2019 at 1:04 pm
While D-Wave’s 2000Q only played a small part in this process, it’s nevertheless a sign that quantum computing is slowly getting ready for production use and that D-Wave’s approach, somewhat ...
- Quantum Leap for Computing Is a Small Step for Computerson November 15, 2019 at 7:00 am
Ariel Procaccia is an associate professor in the computer science department at Carnegie Mellon University. His areas of expertise include artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science and ...
- Dell Technologies on democratising 5G and the future of quantum computingon November 14, 2019 at 2:27 pm
"And this next cycle, trust me, we have no other goal, than broad adoption of these technologies." Quantum computing, it could go either way When asked during a media session what Dell Technologies ...
- Hewlett Packard Enterprise explains why it gave up on quantum computing right as it was splitting off from HP Incon November 8, 2019 at 6:06 am
Hewlett Packard Enterprise explains why it stopped its quantum computing efforts five years ago while IBM, Google, Microsoft, and Intel continue.
via Bing News