A University of Otago bioethicist has added his voice to a global plea for a moratorium on heritable genome editing from a group of international scientists and ethicists in the wake of the recent Chinese experiment aiming to produce HIV immune children.
In an article in the latest issue of international scientific journal Nature, Professor Jing-Bao Nie together with another 16 academics from seven countries, call for a global moratorium on all clinical uses of human germline editing to make genetically modified children.
They would like an international governance framework – in which nations voluntarily commit to not approve any use of clinical germline editing unless certain conditions are met – to be created potentially for a five-year period.
Professor Nie says the scientific scandal of the experiment that led to the world’s first genetically modified babies raises many intriguing ethical, social and transcultural / transglobal issues. His main personal concerns include what he describes as the “inadequacy” of the Chinese and international responses to the experiment.
“The Chinese authorities have conducted a preliminary investigation into the scientist’s genetic misadventure and issued a draft new regulation on the related biotechnologies. These are welcome moves. Yet, by putting blame completely on the rogue scientist individually, the institutional failings are overlooked,” Professor Nie explains.
“In the international discourse, partly due to the mentality of dichotomising China and the West, a tendency exists to characterise the scandal as just a Chinese problem. As a result, the global context of the experiment and Chinese science schemes have been far from sufficiently examined.”
The group of 17 scientists and bioethicists say it is imperative that extensive public discussions about the technical, scientific, medical, societal, ethical and moral issues must be considered before germline editing is permitted. A moratorium would provide time to establish broad societal consensus and an international framework.
“For germline editing to even be considered for a clinical application, its safety and efficacy must be sufficient – taking into account the unmet medical need, the risks and potential benefits and the existence of alternative approaches,” the opinion article states.
Although techniques have improved in recent years, germline editing is not yet safe or effective enough to justify any use in the clinic with the risk of failing to make the desired change or of introducing unintended mutations still unacceptably high, the scientists and ethicists say.
“No clinical application of germline editing should be considered unless its long-term biological consequences are sufficiently understood – both for individuals and for the human species.”
The proposed moratorium does not however, apply to germline editing for research uses or in human somatic (non-reproductive) cells to treat diseases.
Professor Nie considers it significant that current presidents of the UK Royal Society, the US National Academy of Medicine and the Director and Associate Director of the US National Institute of Health have expressed their strong support for such a proposed global moratorium in two correspondences published in the same issue of Nature. The editorial in the issue also argues that the right decision can be reached “only through engaging more communities in the debate”.
“The most challenging questions are whether international organisations and different countries will adopt a moratorium and if yes, whether it will be effective at all,” Professor Nie says.
The Latest on: Heritable genome editing
via Google News
The Latest on: Heritable genome editing
- “Three-Parent IVF” Might Open the Door to Human Genome Editingon December 1, 2020 at 8:00 am
The procedure is sometimes called “three-parent IVF” because while the genes in the nuclei of the embryo’s cells will come from the two parents, mitochondria themselves carry tiny pieces of DNA ...
- Transcripton November 28, 2020 at 6:05 pm
A Chinese scientist's claims that he created the world's first gene-edited babies is a "deeply disturbing" and "irresponsible" violation of international scientific norms, according to a formal ...
- Adaptive evolution at mRNA editing sites in soft-bodied cephalopodson November 27, 2020 at 6:35 am
Such modifications are not inherited directly; however, as the processes affecting them are encoded in the genome, they have a heritable component, and therefore can be shaped by selection. In ...
- Purse strings, patients, and personal gloryon November 26, 2020 at 3:41 pm
Out of this rich tapestry of stories, some central themes emerge, including the question of how profit-driven medicine and dreams of personal and national glory shape the complex landscape of modern ...
- New study on CRISPR: the stake of unintended consequences in embryoson November 23, 2020 at 10:03 am
A recent paper published in the journal Cell revealed the cautionary finding that unwanted changes are introduced after modifying genes in human embryos with CRISPR/Cas9. The study, led by Dr Dietrich ...
- U.S. Panel Supports Use of CRISPR to Genetically Modify Human Embryoson November 4, 2020 at 4:00 pm
The National Academy of Sciences, one of the nation's most influential science advisory groups, announced its support for the use of CRISPR to modify human embryos in a series of heritable germline ...
- World 'not yet ready' for embryo gene-editingon September 6, 2020 at 10:21 am
Heritable genome editing includes making alterations to the genetic material of human eggs, sperm, or any cells that lead to their development, including the cells of early embryos, the report ...
- Learning Englishon August 7, 2020 at 11:42 pm
The review said heritable genome editing could be used to wipe out genetic diseases in some families.
- Somatic genome editing: an overviewon August 6, 2019 at 8:40 pm
Genome editing can be performed in germline cells (sperm, eggs or embryos) to induce heritable genetic changes or in somatic cells (other cells) to induce non-heritable changes. Somatic cell editing ...
via Bing News