With data and modelling from almost 8000 coal power plants, researchers from ETH Zurich present the most comprehensive global picture to date of climate and human health impacts from coal power generation.
Coal-fired power plants produce more than just the carbon dioxide that contributes to global warming. When burning coal, they also release particulate matter, sulphur dioxide, nitrogen oxide and mercury – thus damaging the health of many people around the world in various ways. To estimate where action is most urgently required, the research group led by Stefanie Hellweg from ETH Zurich’s Institute of Environmental Engineering modelled and calculated the undesired side effects of coal power for each of the 7,861 power plant units in the world.
Uneven pollution levels
The results, which were recently published in the journal Nature Sustainability, show that China and the US are the two largest producers of coal power, but power plants in India take the highest toll in the world when it comes to health. Central Europe, North America and China all have modern power plants, but Eastern Europe, Russia and India still have many older power plants equipped with insufficient flue gas treatment. As a result, these power plants only remove a fraction of the pollutants – while also often burning coal of inferior quality. “More than half of the health effects can be traced back to just one tenth of the power plants. These power plants should be upgraded or shut down as quickly as possible,” says Christopher Oberschelp, the lead author of the study.
A question of quality
The global picture of coal power production shows that the gap between privileged and disadvantaged regions is widening. This is happening for two reasons. Firstly, wealthy countries – such as in Europe – import high-quality coal with a high calorific value and low emissions of harmful sulphur dioxide. The poorer coal-exporting countries (such as Indonesia, Colombia and South Africa) are left with low-quality coal, which they often burn in outdated power plants without modern flue gas treatment to remove the sulphur dioxide. Secondly, “In Europe, we contribute to global warming with our own power plants, which has a global impact. However, the local health damage caused by particulate matter, sulphur dioxide and nitrogen oxide occurs mainly in Asia, where coal power is used to manufacture a large proportion of our consumer products,” says Oberschelp.
Coal power threatens to grow worldwide
Global coal resources will last for several hundred years, so the harmful emissions need to be limited politically. “It is particularly important to leave coal that is high in mercury and sulphur content in the ground,” says Oberschelp. Reducing the negative health effects of coal power generation should be a global priority: “But further industrialisation, especially in China and India, poses the risk of aggravating the situation instead,” write the researchers led by Hellweg in their article.
The initial investment costs for the construction of a coal power plant are high, but the subsequent operating costs are low. Power plant operators thus have an economic interest in keeping their plants running for a long time. “The best option is therefore to not build any new coal power plants. From a health and environment perspective, we should move away from coal and towards natural gas – and in the long term, towards renewable energy sources,” says Oberschelp.
Learn more: The global impact of coal power
The Latest on: Coal power
via Google News
The Latest on: Coal power
- Campaigners occupy German coal mines in climate proteston November 30, 2019 at 5:19 am
The occupation is being supported by other environmental groups, including the German branch of Fridays for Future which is also holding a protest at a power station in the region. It will be the ...
- Protests Force Outage at One of Germany’s Biggest Coal Plantson November 30, 2019 at 3:32 am
Photographer: John Macdougall/AFP via Getty Images Photographer: John Macdougall/AFP via Getty Images Anti-coal protesters in east Germany’s Lausitz region have forced power plant operator LEAG to ...
- Bitter Cold Stops Coal But Nuclear Excelson November 29, 2019 at 5:08 am
Judith and the kitties were, too. Through thick and thin, extreme hot or extreme cold, the nuclear plant never seems to stop producing over 9 billion kWhs of energy every year, enough to power Seattle ...
- India pollution regulator threatens to shut coal-fired utilities around New Delhion November 28, 2019 at 6:40 am
India’s federal pollution regulator has warned coal-fired power plants around New Delhi that they could be shut down for failing to comply with deadlines to meet emissions standards, according to ...
- S.Korea plans to shut down up to 15 coal-fired power plants for winteron November 27, 2019 at 11:00 pm
South Korea will idle up to a quarter of its coal-fired power plants between December and February to help limit air pollution, and the remaining plants should be enough to supply power over the ...
- Americans could use renewable energy from solar, wind and hydro power more than coal by 2021on November 27, 2019 at 10:57 am
Americans could use renewable energy produced by solar, wind and hydroelectric power more than coal by 2021, according to a new report. CNN reports that solar and wind power are growing in use so ...
- Coal-Fired Power Is Declining Thanks to a Slowdown in India and Chinaon November 26, 2019 at 1:43 pm
Infographic: Coal-Fired Power Is Declining Thanks to a Slowdown in India and China Coal-Fired Power Is Declining Thanks to... A smokestack from a coal fired power plant is seen near the site of a ...
- GUEST COMMENTARY: Reviving — coal’s staying poweron November 26, 2019 at 6:00 am
In 2017, the Trump administration, with the help of Congress, overturned the Stream Rule, which threatened another third of the coal industry’s jobs. The current administration also repealed and ...
- Coal power set for record fall in 2019: analysison November 25, 2019 at 4:30 am
Global coal-fired power, a key driver of climate change, is set to fall a record 3.0 percent this year, largely led by developed countries although much-criticised China and India play their part too, ...
- Solar and Wind Power Will Cost Less Than Coal by 2030, According to One Analyst’s Mathon November 25, 2019 at 4:19 am
The argument against renewable power sources is that they’re more expensive than traditional fuels like coal and natural gas, particularly after taking into account the fact that renewables are an ...
via Bing News