New research is zeroing in on a biochemical basis for the placebo effect — possibly opening a Pandora’s box for Western medicine.
The Chain of Office of the Dutch city of Leiden is a broad and colorful ceremonial necklace that, draped around the shoulders of Mayor Henri Lenferink, lends a magisterial air to official proceedings in this ancient university town. But whatever gravitas it provided Lenferink as he welcomed a group of researchers to his city, he was quick to undercut it. “I am just a humble historian,” he told the 300 members of the Society for Interdisciplinary Placebo Studies who had gathered in Leiden’s ornate municipal concert hall, “so I don’t know anything about your topic.”
He was being a little disingenuous. He knew enough about the topic that these psychologists and neuroscientists and physicians and anthropologists and philosophers had come to his city to talk about — the placebo effect, the phenomenon whereby suffering people get better from treatments that have no discernible reason to work — to call it “fake medicine,” and to add that it probably works because “people like to be cheated.” He took a beat. “But in the end, I believe that honesty will prevail.”
Lenferink might not have been so glib had he attended the previous day’s meeting on the other side of town, at which two dozen of the leading lights of placebo science spent a preconference day agonizing over their reputation — as purveyors of sham medicine who prey on the desperate and, if they are lucky, fool people into feeling better — and strategizing about how to improve it. It’s an urgent subject for them, and only in part because, like all apostate professionals, they crave mainstream acceptance. More important, they are motivated by a conviction that the placebo is a powerful medical treatment that is ignored by doctors only at their patients’ expense.
And after a quarter-century of hard work, they have abundant evidence to prove it. Give people a sugar pill, they have shown, and those patients — especially if they have one of the chronic, stress-related conditions that register the strongest placebo effects and if the treatment is delivered by someone in whom they have confidence — will improve. Tell someone a normal milkshake is a diet beverage, and his gut will respond as if the drink were low fat. Take athletes to the top of the Alps, put them on exercise machines and hook them to an oxygen tank, and they will perform better than when they are breathing room air — even if room air is all that’s in the tank. Wake a patient from surgery and tell him you’ve done an arthroscopic repair, and his knee gets better even if all you did was knock him out and put a couple of incisions in his skin. Give a drug a fancy name, and it works better than if you don’t.
You don’t even have to deceive the patients. You can hand a patient with irritable bowel syndrome a sugar pill, identify it as such and tell her that sugar pills are known to be effective when used as placebos, and she will get better, especially if you take the time to deliver that message with warmth and close attention. Depression, back pain, chemotherapy-related malaise, migraine, post-traumatic stress disorder: The list of conditions that respond to placebos — as well as they do to drugs, with some patients — is long and growing.
But as ubiquitous as the phenomenon is, and as plentiful the studies that demonstrate it, the placebo effect has yet to become part of the doctor’s standard armamentarium — and not only because it has a reputation as “fake medicine” doled out by the unscrupulous to the credulous. It also has, so far, resisted a full understanding, its mechanisms shrouded in mystery. Without a clear knowledge of how it works, doctors can’t know when to deploy it, or how.
Not that the researchers are without explanations. But most of these have traditionally been psychological in nature, focusing on mechanisms like expectancy — the set of beliefs that a person brings into treatment — and the kind of conditioning that Ivan Pavlov first described more than a century ago. These theories, which posit that the mind acts upon the body to bring about physical responses, tend to strike doctors and researchers steeped in the scientific tradition as insufficiently scientific to lend credibility to the placebo effect. “What makes our research believable to doctors?” asks Ted Kaptchuk, head of Harvard Medical School’s Program in Placebo Studies and the Therapeutic Encounter. “It’s the molecules. They love that stuff.” As of now, there are no molecules for conditioning or expectancy — or, indeed, for Kaptchuk’s own pet theory, which holds that the placebo effect is a result of the complex conscious and nonconscious processes embedded in the practitioner-patient relationship — and without them, placebo researchers are hard-pressed to gain purchase in mainstream medicine.
Learn more: What if the Placebo Effect Isn’t a Trick?
The Latest on: Placebo effect
via Google News
The Latest on: Placebo effect
- Espresso yourself: Coffee thoughts leave a latte on the mind on April 17, 2019 at 12:56 pm
New international research by Monash University and the University of Toronto has found that the placebo effect of coffee can heighten arousal, ambition and focus in regular drinkers without them ... […]
- The chok and the placebo on April 17, 2019 at 12:18 pm
he smilingly gives her a placebo which he stores in his cabinet for such patients. It makes her (and the others too) actually feel better – every time. It has the psychological effect intended ... […]
- Riluzole Does Not Improve Function After Degenerative Disc Surgery on April 17, 2019 at 11:59 am
"There was no additional effect, however, on the primary endpoint with riluzole," he noted. Mean change in mJOA at 6 months was 2.40 with riluzole and 2.86 with placebo (P = .964), and no differences ... […]
- New Research in JNCCN Touts Ice Chips as a Simple, Inexpensive Way to Reduce a Common Chemotherapy Side Effect on April 16, 2019 at 5:55 am
The researchers were surprised to see that peripheral neuropathy symptoms were also reduced in the treatment group, but weren't sure if that could be a result of the placebo effect, or an additional ... […]
- J&J's Invokana shows positive effect in CKD patients with type 2 diabetes on April 15, 2019 at 4:40 am
major adverse CV events by 20% and the risk of hospitalization for heart failure alone by 39% compared to placebo. It also showed a 30% reduction in the risk of the primary composite endpoint ... […]
- CBD Uncertainty: Sales Soar But Science Lags On Hemp Health Effects on April 15, 2019 at 4:02 am
This helps control for the placebo effect, a phenomenon where an individual may experience benefits because of their belief in a treatment, not because the treatment is actually working. […]
- Elafibranor shows anticholestatic effect in PBC on April 13, 2019 at 9:48 am
They randomly assigned these patients to receive 12 weeks of “add-on” oral elafibranor (Genfit) at 80 mg/day (n=14) or 120 mg/day (n = 15) or to receive placebo (n = 14). Both doses of elafibranor ... […]
- The health effects of poor air quality and our energy choices on April 12, 2019 at 9:34 am
“Nocebo, or the opposite of a placebo effect, is the anticipation that you will get worse in a certain setting. Controlled lab evaluations have supported the notion that annoyance and other complaints ... […]
- Anti-Inflammatory Drugs May Have Antidepressant Effects on April 9, 2019 at 8:08 am
“The effect was also present when anti-inflammatory medicine was compared with a placebo in patients with a physical disease and depressive symptoms.” The researchers analyzed 36 international ... […]
via Bing News