Prediction resource could make CRISPR-Cas9 editing more reliable
The largest study of CRISPR action to date has developed a method to predict the exact mutations CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing can introduce to a cell. Researchers at the Wellcome Sanger Institute edited 40,000 different pieces of DNA and analysed a thousand million resulting DNA sequences to reveal the effects of the gene editing and develop a machine learning predictive tool of the outcomes. This will assist researchers who are using CRISPR-Cas9 to research disease mechanisms and drug targets.
Reported today in Nature Biotechnology (27th November), the new resource will enable scientists to predict the best sequences to target to make CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing more reliable, and therefore cheaper and more efficient.
CRISPR-Cas9* is a gene editing technology that enables researchers to cut DNA at any position in the genome, to create mutations and switch off specific genes. This vital technology is used by scientists worldwide to study which genes are important for various conditions, from cancer to rare diseases. It is also now being trialled therapeutically to correct harmful mutations in people’s genes.
A specific guide RNA binds to an exact sequence of target DNA, guiding the Cas9 ‘scissors’ to cut the DNA at the right place. However, it is difficult to predict exactly what the final mutations will be, as further changes often take place when the cell repairs the break, rejoining the two cut ends of the DNA.
To study this, the researchers created over 40,000 pairs of different target DNA and guide RNA, and carried out CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing. By deep sequencing of each pair in different cells, they were able to analyse in detail how the DNA was cut and rejoined. They found that the repair depended on the exact sequence of DNA and guide and discovered that it was reproducible within the same sequence.
The researchers then used the huge quantity of sequence data to create a machine learning computational tool, which created general rules to determine the outcome of the repair. This programme – called FORECasT – enabled them to predict the repaired sequence, using the targeted DNA sequence alone.
“We have carried out the largest, most comprehensive study on CRISPR-Cas9 action to date, and analysed more than a thousand million DNA sequences to allow us to study the process. We demonstrated that specific target sequences were repaired by the cell in the same way, proving that the action of the cell mechanisms is reproducible.”
Dr Luca Crepaldi, joint first author on the study from the Wellcome Sanger Institute
“The discovery of reproducible DNA repair after CRISPR-Cas9 editing, combined with the vast amount of sequence data we generated, meant that we could create a predictive tool using machine learning methods. Our resource can predict the exact mutations resulting from CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, just from the sequence of the target DNA. It will save time and resources for future CRISPR-Cas9 applications, and is openly available for use by all researchers using gene editing to study health and disease.”
Dr Felicity Allen, joint first author from the Wellcome Sanger Institute
“CRISPR-Cas9 is an extremely important system for introducing mutations into DNA for research, and prospective therapeutic purposes. Our research allows scientists to understand its workings much better, and our transformational method enables people to predict the effects of each CRISPR-Cas9 edit in a cell. This allows better design of editing experiments, and may lead to future therapeutic applications.”
Dr Leopold Parts, senior author on the paper from the Wellcome Sanger Institute
The Latest on: Gene editing
via Google News
The Latest on: Gene editing
- Online sale of DYI gene editing kits cause for concern: Scientistson August 16, 2019 at 4:00 pm
Bengaluru: A glowing yeast prepared at home with the help of a gene editing kit available online might make children curious about science. All that they need to do is mix a solution that has ...
- CRISPR Interference Screens Probe Gene Function in Human Neuronson August 16, 2019 at 6:37 am
It was hoped that the subsequent development of CRISPR-Cas9 gene-editing technology would provide the tools needed to allow scientists to study the genetic basis of neurological disorders in ...
- Gene Editing Market Size, Share, Growth, Trend, Therapy, Technology To Achieve An Excellent 18.30% CAGR During The Forecast 2023on August 16, 2019 at 1:59 am
MRFR Offering The Reports Cover Key Developments In The Gene Editing Market As Organic And Inorganic Growth Strategies. Various Companies Are Focusing On Organic Growth Strategies Such As Product ...
- FDA Finds Unexpected Antibiotic Resistance Genes in ‘Gene-Edited’ Dehorned Cattleon August 15, 2019 at 11:04 am
Gene-editing is seen by many as the ultimate in precision breeding. Polled cattle, whose horns have been genetically removed, have been presented as exemplars of this — a socially beneficial use of ...
- Scientists Seek Better Guidelines for Editing Genes in Human Embryoson August 15, 2019 at 10:52 am
Many of those at the meeting supported a full moratorium on germ-line gene editing for clinical use. Carrie Wolinetz, acting chief of staff and associate director for science policy at the National ...
- Germline Genome Editing in the Clinic: International Commission Urges Cautionon August 15, 2019 at 4:49 am
In 2017, the National Academy of Sciences released a report on the scientific underpinnings of human gene and genome editing technology and potential uses and implications. "The 2017 report concludes ...
- Gene editing could combat 'weed trees' and climate changeon August 14, 2019 at 9:49 am
A forest industry leader has joined the growing chorus of voices calling for serious public debate on genetic technologies. Forest Owners Association president Peter Weir said the Royal Society Te ...
- Sangamo: Lead Gene Therapy Program Moving Into Phase 3on August 13, 2019 at 2:51 pm
Gene editing trials for hemophilia B, MPS I and MPS II were put on hold. Gene and cell therapies became the more immediate opportunities. Hemophilia A became their lead program followed by gene ...
- Scientists can't be trusted on gene editingon August 13, 2019 at 11:00 am
In mid-July, a bipartisan trio of U.S. senators — Democrats Dianne Feinstein of California and Jack Reed of Rhode Island and Republican Marco Rubio of Florida — introduced a resolution calling for the ...
via Bing News