A massive new survey developed by MIT researchers reveals some distinct global preferences concerning the ethics of autonomous vehicles, as well as some regional variations in those preferences.
The survey has global reach and a unique scale, with over 2 million online participants from over 200 countries weighing in on versions of a classic ethical conundrum, the “Trolley Problem.” The problem involves scenarios in which an accident involving a vehicle is imminent, and the vehicle must opt for one of two potentially fatal options. In the case of driverless cars, that might mean swerving toward a couple of people, rather than a large group of bystanders.
“The study is basically trying to understand the kinds of moral decisions that driverless cars might have to resort to,” says Edmond Awad, a postdoc at the MIT Media Lab and lead author of a new paper outlining the results of the project. “We don’t know yet how they should do that.”
Still, Awad adds, “We found that there are three elements that people seem to approve of the most.”
Indeed, the most emphatic global preferences in the survey are for sparing the lives of humans over the lives of other animals; sparing the lives of many people rather than a few; and preserving the lives of the young, rather than older people.
“The main preferences were to some degree universally agreed upon,” Awad notes. “But the degree to which they agree with this or not varies among different groups or countries.” For instance, the researchers found a less pronounced tendency to favor younger people, rather than the elderly, in what they defined as an “eastern” cluster of countries, including many in Asia.
The paper, “The Moral Machine Experiment,” is being published today in Nature.
The authors are Awad; Sohan Dsouza, a doctoral student in the Media Lab; Richard Kim, a research assistant in the Media Lab; Jonathan Schulz, a postdoc at Harvard University; Joseph Henrich, a professor at Harvard; Azim Shariff, an associate professor at the University of British Columbia; Jean-François Bonnefon, a professor at the Toulouse School of Economics; and Iyad Rahwan, an associate professor of media arts and sciences at the Media Lab, and a faculty affiliate in the MIT Institute for Data, Systems, and Society.
Awad is a postdoc in the MIT Media Lab’s Scalable Cooperation group, which is led by Rahwan.
To conduct the survey, the researchers designed what they call “Moral Machine,” a multilingual online game in which participants could state their preferences concerning a series of dilemmas that autonomous vehicles might face. For instance: If it comes right down it, should autonomous vehicles spare the lives of law-abiding bystanders, or, alternately, law-breaking pedestrians who might be jaywalking? (Most people in the survey opted for the former.)
All told, “Moral Machine” compiled nearly 40 million individual decisions from respondents in 233 countries; the survey collected 100 or more responses from 130 countries. The researchers analyzed the data as a whole, while also breaking participants into subgroups defined by age, education, gender, income, and political and religious views. There were 491,921 respondents who offered demographic data.
The scholars did not find marked differences in moral preferences based on these demographic characteristics, but they did find larger “clusters” of moral preferences based on cultural and geographic affiliations. They defined “western,” “eastern,” and “southern” clusters of countries, and found some more pronounced variations along these lines. For instance: Respondents in southern countries had a relatively stronger tendency to favor sparing young people rather than the elderly, especially compared to the eastern cluster.
Awad suggests that acknowledgement of these types of preferences should be a basic part of informing public-sphere discussion of these issues. In all regions, since there is a moderate preference for sparing law-abiding bystanders rather than jaywalkers, knowing these preferences could, in theory, inform the way software is written to control autonomous vehicles.
“The question is whether these differences in preferences will matter in terms of people’s adoption of the new technology when [vehicles] employ a specific rule,” he says.
Rahwan, for his part, notes that “public interest in the platform surpassed our wildest expectations,” allowing the researchers to conduct a survey that raised awareness about automation and ethics while also yielding specific public-opinion information.
“On the one hand, we wanted to provide a simple way for the public to engage in an important societal discussion,” Rahwan says. “On the other hand, we wanted to collect data to identify which factors people think are important for autonomous cars to use in resolving ethical tradeoffs.”
Beyond the results of the survey, Awad suggests, seeking public input about an issue of innovation and public safety should continue to become a larger part of the dialoge surrounding autonomous vehicles.
“What we have tried to do in this project, and what I would hope becomes more common, is to create public engagement in these sorts of decisions,” Awad says.
Learn more: How should autonomous vehicles be programmed?
The Latest on: Ethics of autonomous vehicles
via Google News
The Latest on: Ethics of autonomous vehicles
- Solving the Problem of Moral Autonomy in Autonomous Vehicle Software on December 18, 2018 at 4:27 pm
13 (2) Liability for a Car’s “Ethical” Decision-Making Even assuming society can reach consensus on the type of moral framework to implement in autonomous cars, there remains the question of who, if a... […]
- The Moral Machine of Autonomous Technology on December 10, 2018 at 9:19 pm
The ability for autonomous vehicles to make morally acceptable decisions ... saw volunteers participating in ethical tasks hosted on the Moral Machine website over an 18-month period. […]
- Commentary: The Ethics of Autonomous Vehicles on December 10, 2018 at 3:19 pm
How do you know you can trust a robot? That’s the question tackled by IEEE in its new ethics certification program for autonomous systems. IEEE stands for the Institute of Electrical and Electronics E... […]
- New U of Illinois Center to Focus on Autonomous Technology on December 10, 2018 at 7:48 am
But he says “there’s a difference between a self-driving car that works most of the time and ... thinking on many critical issues associated with autonomous systems, such as: Exploring the ethical con... […]
- Are ethical guidelines needed for autonomous vehicles? on December 6, 2018 at 4:08 pm
When we drive we are faced with a multitude of different moral decisions that affect our behaviour towards other users on the road. We all respond differently to things like emergencies or overtaking ... […]
- Autonomous vehicles - An issue of trust on November 29, 2018 at 4:03 am
a well-known ethics quandary, introducing elements such as gender, age, law and status to determine whether certain factors affect a user’s decision. For example: A passenger of a fully autonomous veh... […]
- Massive Study Shows People Think Autonomous Cars Should Kill Criminals Before Dogs Among Other Revelations on November 29, 2018 at 12:56 am
A game-like survey called the Moral Machine has been polling over two million people from 233 countries over the past two years to get their input on how autonomous ... with the ethics of making decis... […]
- Will autonomous cars reveal everything about you? on November 18, 2018 at 4:00 pm
especially after last week’s Motor Mouth column on the things-that-make-you-wince concept of autonomous vehicles as brothels just last week. In our own version of a relay race, he’d tagged me after I’ ... […]
- The development of connected and autonomous vehicles and their ethical dilemma on November 11, 2018 at 3:45 pm
The automotive industry is undergoing a major change with the advent of electrification, autonomous driving, and connectivity. These three factors oblige automotive manufacturers and suppliers to reth... […]
via Bing News