Authors recommend dedicated attention to and investment in “potentially transformative” technologies to complement traditional approaches to prevention, preparedness, and response
Strategic investment in 15 promising technologies could help make the world better prepared and equipped to prevent future infectious disease outbreaks from becoming catastrophic events.
This subset of emerging technologies and their potential application are the focus of a new report, Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks, by a team of researchers at the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security. The study is among the first to assess technologies for the purpose of reducing GCBRs—a special category of risk defined previously by the Center as threats from biological agents that could lead to sudden, extraordinary, widespread disaster beyond the collective capability of national and international organizations and the private sector to control.
“While systems to respond [to an outbreak] are in place in many areas of the world, traditional approaches can be too slow or limited in scope to prevent biological events from becoming severe, even in the best of circumstances,” wrote the Center authors. “This type of response remains critically important for today’s emergencies, but it can and should be augmented by novel methods and technologies to improve the speed, accuracy, scalability, and reach of the response.”
Through an extensive literature review and interviews with more than 50 experts, the Center project team identified 15 example technologies and grouped them into 5 broad categories that are significantly relevant to public health preparedness and response:
- Disease Detection, Surveillance, and Situational Awareness: Ubiquitous Genomic Sequencing and Sensing, Drone Networks for Environmental Detection, Remote Sensing for Agricultural Pathogens
- Infectious Disease Diagnostics: Microfluidic Devices, Handheld Mass Spectrometry, Cell-Free Diagnostics
- Distributed Medical Countermeasure Manufacturing: 3D Printing of Chemicals and Biologics, Synthetic Biology for Manufacturing MCMs
- Medical Countermeasure Distribution, Dispensing, and Administration: Microarray Patches for Vaccine Administration, Self-Spreading Vaccines, Ingestible Bacteria for Vaccination, Self-Amplifying mRNA Vaccines, Drone Delivery to Remote Locations
- Medical Care and Surge Capacity: Robotics and Telehealth, Portable Easy-to-Use Ventilator
The project team noted their list is not exhaustive or an endorsement of specific companies. The team used a modified version of DARPA’s Heilmeier Catechism to standardize the process of evaluating each technology and formulating guidance for funding decisions. That process informed the team’s high-level assessment of the readiness of each technology (from early development to being field-ready), the potential impact of the technology on GCBR reduction (from low to high), and the amount of financial investment that would be needed to meaningfully deploy the technology (from low to high). Details on these findings are included in the report.
Crystal Watson, DrPH, MPH, a senior scholar at the Center, Senior Analyst Matthew Watson, and Senior Scholar Tara Kirk Sell, PhD, MA, co-led the project team, which also included Caitlin Rivers, PhD, MPH; Matthew Shearer, MPH; former Analyst Christopher Hurtado, MHS; former Research Assistant Ashley Geleta, MS; and Tom Inglesby, MD, the Center’s director. Their work contributes new ideas to a field in need of innovation despite important, ongoing progress in both the public and private sectors to address pandemic risk.
“The adoption and use of novel technologies for the purpose of epidemic control and public health often lag well behind the innovation curve because they do not have a lucrative market driving their development,” wrote the authors. “This leaves unrealized opportunities for improved practice.”
They recommend creating a consortium of technology developers, public health practitioners, and policymakers tasked with understanding pressing problems surrounding pandemics and GCBRs and jointly developing technology solutions.
The Latest on: Catastrophic biological risks
via Google News
The Latest on: Catastrophic biological risks
- Wyoming's winter elk feeding could spread 'zombie deer disease,' experts fearon November 26, 2019 at 11:03 pm
Because prions can remain for years in soil, Wyoming's feedgrounds could become "de facto biological 'Superfund' sites contaminated with infectious prions," retired U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service ...
- Evidence-Based Approach to Overcoming the Adverse Effects of Environmental Change on Food Safety in Developing Countrieson November 19, 2019 at 2:28 am
EC can lead to extreme conditions such as high temperatures, catastrophic flooding incidents ... and products with industrial waste and human sewage (sources for chemical and biological hazards). In ...
- 15 Emerging Technologies That Could Reduce Global Catastrophic Biological Riskson November 2, 2019 at 5:00 pm
This subset of emerging technologies and their potential application are the focus of a new report, Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risks, by a team of researchers at the Johns ...
- Pandemic warning: Terrifying new report warns every country on Earth is at riskon October 25, 2019 at 9:23 am
“The bottom line is that global biological risks are growing - in many cases faster than health ... Countries are not prepared for a globally catastrophic biological event, including those that could ...
- The final countdown: the top 13 apocalypse scenarioson October 9, 2019 at 4:03 am
Experts at the John Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health last year published a detailed report on Technologies to Address Global Catastrophic Biological Risk, which sets out 15 technologies that ...
- A global pandemic could travel anywhere in the world in 36 hours – and kill up to 80 million peopleon September 18, 2019 at 4:09 am
“Taken together, naturally occurring, accidental, or deliberate events caused by high-impact respiratory pathogens pose global catastrophic biological risks”. The world would not be prepared for a ...
- World must prepare for biological weapons that target ethnic groups based on genetics, says Cambridge Universityon August 12, 2019 at 4:01 pm
Biological weapons could be built which target individuals ... said the government was failing to prepare for ‘human-driven catastrophic risks’ that could lead to mass harm and societal collapse. In ...
- Risk communication strategies for the very worst of caseson June 7, 2019 at 2:07 pm
In 2017-18, the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security conducted a multiphase research project to help inform the development of a strategic approach for communicating about global catastrophic ...
- Massive insect decline could have 'catastrophic' environmental impact, study sayson February 11, 2019 at 7:27 am
published in the journal Biological Conservation.Insect biomass is declining by a staggering 2.5 percent a year, a rate that indicates widespread extinctions within a century, the report found.In ...
via Bing News