A new analysis looks at what it would take for oil companies to start pumping millions of tons of carbon dioxide into their wells to boost crude production – and what it would mean for the climate.
in February 2018, Donald Trump signed into law new tax credits that reward oil companies for capturing carbon dioxide and preventing it from entering the atmosphere – either by burying the gas underground or by pumping it into wells to boost production. These tax credits, which have bipartisan support, are encouraging for those who believe that trapping CO2 from the fossil fuel industry – though no substitute for deploying cleaner energy sources – could help combat runaway climate change while society remains reliant on oil, gas and coal.
Now, a Stanford University analysis published Aug. 15 in the journal Joule suggests another way the government could encourage the oil and gas industry to capture and store carbon. The article proposes a model for how relatively small government payments could pave the way for oil reservoirs to stash away more CO2 than their burned contents unleash.
“If you look at air transport, shipping, heavy-duty land-based transportation, these are uses of fossil fuels that are definitely expected to grow,” said lead author Sally Benson, a professor of energy resources engineering at the School of Earth, Energy & Environmental Sciences (Stanford Earth). “As an insurance policy, getting everybody to contribute to solving this problem is really important, including the oil and gas industry.”
Carbon in, oil out
When injected into reservoirs, carbon dioxide can help drive oil and profits from aging wells. The technique, known as carbon dioxide-enhanced oil recovery, has been in use since the 1970s. Oil companies using it today pump in about two-and-a-half tons of carbon for every barrel of oil produced. “When you do that, the emissions from burning the oil are almost identical to the CO2 you’re putting in the reservoir,” said Benson, who co-directs Stanford’s Precourt Institute for Energy.
The problem is that most of the 65 million metric tons of CO2 used in these oil recovery projects each year comes from natural reservoirs – not refineries, power plants or other sources contributing to climate change.
In their analysis, Benson and co-author John Deutch, a professor emeritus at MIT, propose a cost-effective way of encouraging oil and gas companies to double the amount of carbon injected for every barrel of oil and to draw their CO2 from human-related sources. They say a 10-fold increase in the amount drawn from these sources could shrink the nation’s climate emissions by as much as 9.5 percent – even when accounting for the additional oil extraction made possible by injecting all that carbon.
All of this could be done at surprisingly low cost, the researchers claim, if companies start out trapping CO2 from relatively pure streams, like those vented from ethanol and fertilizer plants. According to Benson, experience gained on these projects could then help to drive down the cost of capturing and treating CO2 from mixed emission sources, such as cement and power plants.
As an insurance policy, getting everybody to contribute to solving this problem is really important, including the oil and gas industry.
Director, Precourt Institute for Energy and Professor of Energy Resources Engineering and Senior Fellow at the Precourt Institute for Energy
Lighting a fire
Benson and Deutch, who is a former head of the Central Intelligence Agency and deputy defense secretary, argue that government should encourage industry to prepare for a future with an economy-wide price on carbon emissions – in part by developing better carbon storage technology.
Doubling the amount of CO2 per barrel of oil compared to the standard practice today, as Benson and Deutch envision, would almost certainly be more expensive for operators. The new analysis suggests it would add at least $22 per ton of injected carbon in a hypothetical scenario where oil costs $100 a barrel.
“That’s a lot of cost for an oil company,” Benson said. “If one company does it and they don’t all do it, then your products are just more expensive than the competition. People just buy the cheapest crude oil they can.”
To overcome those costs and spur development of technology for carbon-negative oil recovery, the researchers suggest the government pilot test something called a reverse Dutch auction. Owners of new oil recovery projects would submit bids to the government specifying how much money they would want as a reward for carbon injection and how much CO2 they expect the project to ultimately sequester.
With this system, Benson and Deutch estimate it would cost the government about $25 per ton of carbon dioxide captured. If 30 projects earned that amount for a decade apiece, the program would trap 264 million tons of CO2, and government spending on the experiment would total $6.6 billion.
For comparison, the newly expanded tax credits offer $35 per ton of CO2 captured and put to use, or $50 per ton if the carbon is simply buried. According to Benson, her proposed pilot program could cost less and provide incentives for a wider variety of companies that may not benefit from a tax credit.
The Latest on: Carbon injection
via Google News
The Latest on: Carbon injection
- Should we engineer the climate? A social scientist and natural scientist discuss on December 17, 2018 at 5:29 am
That’s everybody on Earth. What if some nations were harmed by the aerosol injections of others? Attributing liability would be greatly contentious in a world where you can no longer disentangle ... […]
- At Penn State, researchers push for answers on carbon capture: Will it stay where we put it? on December 17, 2018 at 4:18 am
It generally involves filtering out carbon dioxide from the rest of the emissions from a coal or gas-fired power plant. The CO2 then shoots through a pipeline to an injection site, where it’s pumped i... […]
- LEVY: Will feds okay safe injection sites even when Ontario says no? on December 14, 2018 at 4:41 pm
Call it retribution for Premier Doug Ford’s carbon tax fight or simply a shameless ... Amid contentions that safe injection sites save lives (something I question) in the midst of an opioid ... […]
- Automotive Rear Spoiler Market Expected to Deliver Dynamic Progression until 2022 on December 14, 2018 at 4:29 pm
Although, carbon fiber is also expected to gain more than one-fourth ... mid-sized passenger cars are projected to create an incremental opportunity surpassing US$ 200 million. Injection Molding to Ga... […]
- Advancing imaging technology to monitor carbon dioxide use and storage on December 13, 2018 at 12:20 pm
Pressure and temperature data for the project will come from the injection site and monitoring wells at the Petra Nova carbon capture and storage site near Houston, Texas. The location is part of a jo... […]
- Cost of Carbon Capture Just Got Lower Thanks to New Tech on December 8, 2018 at 12:34 pm
Captured carbon is compressed and liquefied and then it is either transported to be used in other industrial processes or it is stored underground in depleted oil/gas fields or saline formations. Unde... […]
- “We are in trouble”: Global carbon emissions reached record high in 2018 on December 8, 2018 at 11:56 am
Supervised drug injection site UN: Curbing climate change would reap huge health benefits Tharoor: France’s protests mark a broader crisis for Western democracy Xcel Energy shooting for 100-percent ca... […]
- Carbon management poised to make great strides on December 6, 2018 at 1:47 pm
Carbon management is set to make significant advances ... year operations beginning the first day of 2021 could see credits of up to $40 million for EOR injection and $57 million for non-EOR injection ... […]
- Boeing to Recycle Carbon-Fiber Material on December 5, 2018 at 7:22 pm
These include milled fibers in several variants, suitable for epoxy coatings, thermoplastic injection molding, and compounding applications. It also produces non-woven carbon-fiber and hybrid non-wove... […]
via Bing News