A collaborative study by researchers at Tokyo Institute of Technology has developed a new technique to decode motor intention of humans from Electroencephalography (EEG).
This technique is motivated by the well documented ability of the brain to predict sensory outcomes of self-generated and imagined actions utilizing so called forward models. The method enabled for the first time, nearly 90% single trial decoding accuracy across tested subjects, within 96 ms of the stimulation, with zero user training, and with no additional cognitive load on the users.
The ultimate dream of brain computer interface (BCI) research is to develop an efficient connection between machines and the human brain, such that the machines may be used at will. For example, enabling an amputee to use a robot arm attached to him, just by thinking of it, as if it was his own arm. A big challenge for such a task is the deciphering of a human user’s movement intention from his brain activity, while minimizing the user effort. While a plethora of methods have been suggested for this in the last two decades (1-2), they all require large effort in part of the human user- they either require extensive user training, work well with only a section of the users, or need to use a conspicuous stimulus, inducing additional attentional and cognitive loads on the users. In this study, Researchers from Tokyo Institute of Technology (Tokyo Tech), Le Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS-France), AIST and Osaka University propose a new movement intention decoding philosophy and technique that overcomes all these issues while providing equally much better decoding performance.
The fundamental difference between the previous methods and what they propose is in what is decoded. All the previous methods decode what movement a user intends/imagines, either directly (as in the so called active BCI systems) or indirectly, by decoding what he is attending to (like the reactive BCI systems). Here the researchers propose to use a subliminal sensory stimulator with the Electroencephalography (EEG), and decode, not what movement a user intends/imagines, but to decode whether the movement he intends matches (or not) the sensory feedback sent to the user using the stimulator. Their proposal is motivated by the multitude of studies on so called Forward models in the brain; the neural circuitry implicated in predicting sensory outcomes of self-generated movements (3). The sensory prediction errors, between the forward model predictions and the actual sensory signals, are known to be fundamental for our sensory-motor abilities- for haptic perception (4), motor control (5), motor learning (6), and even inter-personal interactions (7-8) and the cognition of self (9). The researchers therefore hypothesized the predictions errors to have a large signature in EEG, and perturbing the prediction errors (using an external sensory stimulator) to be a promising way to decode movement intentions.
This proposal was tested in a binary simulated wheelchair task, in which users thought of turning their wheelchair either left or right. The researchers stimulated the user’s vestibular system (as this is the dominant sensory feedback during turning), towards either the left or right direction, subliminally using a galvanic vestibular stimulator. They then decode for the presence of prediction errors (ie. whether or stimulation direction matches the direction the user imagines, or not) and consequently, as the direction of stimulation is known, the direction the user imagines. This procedure provides excellent single trial decoding accuracy (87.2% median) in all tested subjects, and within 96 ms of stimulation. These results were obtained with zero user training and with no additional cognitive load on the users, as the stimulation was subliminal.
- Figure 2.
- Decoding performance summary:The across subject median decoding performance when decoding for the direction in which a subject wants to turn (ie. the cue direction), as has been tried in previous methods, is shown in red and pink, while decoding using the new proposed method is shown in black. The data at each time point represents the decoding performance using data from the time period between a reference point (?cue’ for red data, and ?GVS start’ for pink and black data) and that time point. Box plot boundaries represent the 25th and 75th percentile, while the whiskers represent the data range across subjects. The inset histograms shows the subject ensemble decoding performance in the 140 (twenty X7 subjects) test trials, with each subject data shown in a different color.
This proposal promises to radically change how movement intention is decoded, due to several reasons. Primarily, because the method promises better decoding accuracies with no user training and without inducing additional cognitive loads on the users. Furthermore, the fact that the decoding can be done in less than 100 ms of the stimulation highlights its use for real-time decoding. Finally, this method is distinct from other methods utilizing ERP, ERD and ERN, showing that it can be used in parallel to current methods to improve their accuracy.
The Latest on: Brain computer interface
via Google News
The Latest on: Brain computer interface
- Silicon Valley wants to read your mind – here’s why you should be worriedon August 16, 2019 at 4:02 am
A predictable step would be to combine the “in” and “out” technologies for a two-way brain-computer interface. The potential for governments to make us more compliant, for employers to ...
- Neuralink guide: How wearables will play their part in Elon Musk's brain techon August 13, 2019 at 2:30 pm
At an event in San Francisco, the Neuralink team revealed it has been developing a brain-computer interface (BCI) made of thin, thread-like implants. This could one day work with (or, more ...
- Elon Musk’s Neuralink: Both an evolution and a plan for radical changeon August 13, 2019 at 4:45 am
When Elon Musk first started talking about launching a brain-computer interface company, he made a number of comments that set expectations for what that idea might entail. The company ...
- General Counsel Joins Elon Musk's Human Brain-Machine Interface Companyon August 12, 2019 at 5:18 pm
That’s the same month the San Francisco-based company announced it developed electrode “threads” that could advance human brain-computer machine interface technology. If he stays on board, Feerst ...
- How a Brain-Computer Interface Could Help Paralyzed Veterans at Homeon August 12, 2019 at 11:34 am
Over the course of a five-year study, a paralyzed man was able to regain conscious control of his hand, wrist, and fingers by using a brain-computer interface technology from Battelle called NeuroLife ...
- Brain Computer Interface Devices - Growing Popularity and Emerging Trends in the Market: NeuroPace, MindMotion, Emotiv Systemson August 12, 2019 at 6:03 am
Edison, NJ -- (SBWIRE) -- 08/12/2019 -- Global Brain Computer Interface Devices Market Report 2019 is latest research study released by HTF MI evaluating the market, highlighting opportunities, risk ...
- Elon Musk's Neuralink Has Connected A Monkey Brain To A Computeron August 10, 2019 at 5:10 pm
“A monkey has been able to control the computer with his brain. Just, y'know, FYI.” As Musk explains, humans already interface with digital systems when we use a smartphone or laptop ...
- Wireless Brain Sensors Market Industry Review, Key Players Profile, Statistics and Growth to 2027on August 9, 2019 at 11:56 am
Significant technological advances in brain-computer interfaces have been leading to continuous evolution of brain sensors. The sensors used in currently are remotely accessible through wireless ...
- Tricky interfaces: Brain-computer interfaces are still a long way offon August 9, 2019 at 4:52 am
It will still be a long time before brain-computer interfaces are able to read thoughts. And many limitations need to be considered, according to Roger Gassert. Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs ...
via Bing News