A new analysis shows that air capture could cost less than $100 a ton.
While avoiding the worst dangers of climate change will likely require sucking carbon dioxide out of the sky, prominent scientists have long dismissed such technologies as far too expensive.
But a detailed new analysis published today in the journal Joule finds that direct air capture may be practical after all. The study concludes it would cost between $94 and $232 per ton of captured carbon dioxide, if existing technologies were implemented on a commercial scale. One earlier estimate, published in Proceedings of the National Academies,put that figure at more than $1,000 (though the calculations were made on what’s known as an avoided-cost basis, which would add about 10 percent to the new study’s figures).
Crucially, the lowest-cost design, optimized to produce and sell alternative fuels made from the captured carbon dioxide, could already be profitable with existing public policies in certain markets (see “The carbon-capture era may finally be starting”). The higher cost estimates are for plants that would deliver compressed carbon dioxide for permanent underground storage.
Making direct air capture as cheap as possible is critical because a growing body of work finds it’s going to be nearly impossible to prevent global temperatures from rising more than 1.5 ?C without rolling out some form of the technology on a huge scale. By some estimates, the world will emit enough greenhouse gases to lock in that level of warming within a few years. At that point, one of the only ways to reverse the effects is to remove carbon dioxide from the atmosphere, where it otherwise persists for thousands of years.
David Keith, a Harvard physics professor and lead author of the paper, says the findings should shift the perception of direct air capture from “vaporware” to “something that can be built with current industrial technologies now.”
Keith is also the founder of Carbon Engineering, a Calgary-based startup that has spent the last nine years designing, refining, and testing a direct air capture pilot plant in Squamish, British Columbia. (See “Go inside an industrial plant that sucks carbon dioxide straight out of the air.”) The study, partially funded by the US Department of Energy, simulates a scaled-up version, based on the facility’s actual performance and cost data.
“I hope it’s a real change in the community’s view of the technology,” Keith says.
In 2011, a pair of influential papers all but sounded the death knell for direct air capture, concluding that the approach would cost nearly an order of magnitude more than capturing the greenhouse gas from power-plant stacks.
“It’d be such a great solution—if it were real,” MIT Energy Initiative senior researcher Howard Herzog, who coauthored the study that found costs could top $1,000 a ton, said at the time.
In an interview this week, Herzog complimented the detailed analysis in the new study, but said he remains skeptical of some of its financial assumptions. He expects that Carbon Engineering will face higher costs and challenges than it anticipates as the company moves to build larger plants.
“Until you really can confirm the costs and performance at scale, you’ve always got to take those costs with a grain of salt,” he says. “I still think a final number could be several times as much.”
The cost differences from the earlier studies arise mainly from different design choices. Those include the use of horizontally rather than vertically stacked structures, lower energy demands due to improved heat integration in the process, and the power sources selected to run the plant.
Carbon Engineering plans to combine the carbon captured at its plants with hydrogen to produce carbon-neutral synthetic fuels, a process the pilot facility has already been performing. Such fuels are more expensive than standard gasoline and diesel, so the size and stability of the market for them will depend largely on whether subsidies are in place.
Carbon Engineering has secured $30 million to date. It’s currently seeking additional funds to build a larger facility that will begin selling fuels, though still on a relatively small scale.
But those carbon-neutral fuels won’t directly help to reduce carbon in the atmosphere (unless they’re used in systems that capture carbon as well). To make real gains in removing greenhouse gases, the world may eventually need to permanently store massive amounts of captured carbon dioxide, rather than releasing it again when synthetic fuels burn. Doing that on a large scale would almost surely require significant cost reductions, a high price on carbon, or other public policy support.
Keith says producing synthetic fuels offers a sustainable business model that could help companies scale up and reduce the costs of the technology, easing the path to that eventual goal.
But Herzog, who has also studied the challenges of converting carbon dioxide into fuel, remains skeptical that the numbers will work even for that initial business model.
“It’s very tough, and even tougher if the CO2 is from your most expensive source, which is the air,” he says.
Receive an email update when we add a new AIR CAPTURE article.
The Latest on: Air capture
via Google News
The Latest on: Air capture
- Read This Before Buying an Air Purifier on December 18, 2018 at 10:14 am
What are air purifiers supposed to filter out - and do they actually do it? Most filters on the market are designed to capture particles like dust and pollen, but don’t catch gases like VOCs (volatile ... […]
- Elgi Equipments aims 2nd spot in global air compressor market by 2027 on December 15, 2018 at 6:20 am
With a goal to be the number two player in the global air compressor market by 2027 ... wanted to move up the ladder and capture the second spot by 2027, Elgi Managing Director, Jairam Varadharaj told ... […]
- Xcel Energy's Climate Plan Includes Carbon Capture on December 14, 2018 at 10:15 pm
"It could be carbon capture," he said, noting several existing power plants ... He also mentioned barriers to technologies, including CCS under Clean Air Act regulations. "CCS needs to be part of the ... […]
- Families of Lion Air crash victims demand search for wreckage on December 13, 2018 at 9:14 am
AFP could not immediately reach Kirana for comment on the report. Lion Air Group has expanded rapidly in the past two decades to capture half the domestic market and now has Southeast Asia's biggest f... […]
- Scientists identify new minerals for carbon capture on December 12, 2018 at 9:53 am
Controls on carbonate mineralogy and efficiency of CO2 air capture in mine tailings," was published in the International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control. […]
- Eyes in the sky capture carbon, other climate culprits on December 11, 2018 at 10:49 pm
"We have no time to waste." Space-based observations allow scientists to capture the big picture, Tarasova said. But, she added, "It's like a Russian doll. You start from the global observation ... […]
- How One Company Pulls Carbon From The Air, Aiming To Avert A Climate Catastrophe on December 10, 2018 at 11:07 am
Carbon Engineering has been working for nearly a decade on the technology behind a "direct air capture" pilot plant, which sits just outside its office. The process of capturing CO2 starts with an "ai... […]
- EPA Rollbacks On Air Quality Rules Worry Wisconsin Health Advocacy Organization on December 10, 2018 at 4:11 am
It regulates air pollution generated in one place that “wafts” across ... Under the rule, plant owners would be required to incorporate technology to capture carbon dioxide emissions. EPA acting admin... […]
- How 1 Company Pulls Carbon From The Air, Aiming To Avert A Climate Catastrophe on December 10, 2018 at 3:04 am
Carbon Engineering has been working for nearly a decade on the technology behind a "direct air capture" pilot plant, which sits just outside its office. An aerial view of Carbon Engineering's direct a... […]
via Bing News