Researchers at Oregon State University are challenging the premise that trophy hunting is an acceptable and effective tool for wildlife conservation and community development.
They argue that charging hunters to kill animals and claim body parts should be a last resort rather than a fallback plan.
In a paper published today in Conservation Letters, the researchers label the practice as morally inappropriate and say alternative strategies such as ecotourism should be fully explored and ruled out before trophy hunting is broadly endorsed.
“Trophies are body parts,” said lead author Chelsea Batavia, a Ph.D. student in OSU’s College of Forestry. “But when I read the literature, I don’t see researchers talking about them like that. Nobody’s even flinching. And at this point it seems to have become so normalized, no one really stops to think about what trophy hunting actually entails.”
Furthermore, the authors point out, the notion that trophy hunting is imperative to conservation seems to have taken hold largely without compelling empirical evidence. Such an assumption is not only unsubstantiated but can also serve to squelch the search for alternatives.
“Rejecting trophy hunting could open up space for innovation and creativity,” they write.
Batavia worked with colleagues in Oregon State’s Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society and collaborators from Canada and Australia. The idea for the paper occurred to them over the course of a review of scholarly literature on trophy hunting.
“Conservation scientists commonly recognize strong public opposition to the practice, and at times even point to some sort of ethical tension, but they don’t really define or address it,” Batavia said.
She and her co-authors decided it was time to break the silence and highlight an issue they suspect may underpin the public discomfort around trophy hunting – that it involves a hunter paying a fee to kill an animal and subsequently retaining some or all of the animal’s body as a trophy.
Part of the ongoing problem, the researchers write, is the word “trophy,” a sanitized expression for the tusks, ears, feet, heads, etc. that hunters remove from the animals’ bodies.
“It’s almost like an ethical distraction, calling it by some other name,” said co-author Michael Paul Nelson, a professor and the Ruth H. Spaniol Chair of Renewable Resources at OSU. “We have these metaphors that we hide behind. It’s like we recognize it’s an ethically loaded topic but we don’t know what to do about it. And we’ve tied conservation to the practice of trophy hunting – how do we get off that train?”
Proponents argue that trophy hunting supports conservation goals by generating money and reducing poaching and also that it bolsters local economies.
Nelson, Batavia and their co-authors recognize these benefits, but they counter that “collecting bodies or body parts as trophies is an ethically inappropriate way to interact with individual animals, regardless of the beneficial outcomes that do or do not follow.”
“We owe these animals some basic modicum of respect,” the researchers suggest. “To transform them into trophies of human conquest is a violation of common decency, and to accept trophy hunting as the international conservation community seems to have done is to aid and abet an immoral practice.”
If it’s determined that saving wildlife is inexorably linked to trophy hunting, conservationists should then “accept the practice only with a due appreciation of tragedy, and proper remorse,” the researchers write. They do acknowledge the possibility that future scientific research may suggest trophy hunting is in fact critical to the conservation mission in certain contexts.
“In that case trophy hunting should be used reluctantly,” they write. “The enthusiasm with which trophy hunting has already been championed as a potential conservation success story is misplaced. Trophy hunting violates the dignity of individual nonhuman animals, and is beneath our dignity as human beings. Continuing complicity by conservationists without fully exhausting other options is not now appropriate nor has it ever been.”
The Latest on: Trophy hunting
via Google News
The Latest on: Trophy hunting
- Human exploitation is changing leopard behaviour, with genetic costson May 11, 2020 at 1:41 am
Using GPS collars, sightings and genetic samples, we gathered over 15 years of data to reconstruct home ranges and family pedigrees for 150 leopards in South Africa.
- Capturing the New Big Five — your chance to vote for a new wildlife projecton May 8, 2020 at 9:02 am
Covid-19 was still a world away last year when I started working on the New Big 5 project. The idea behind this international initiative is simple: to create a new Big 5 of wildlife photography, ...
- Allowing brass knuckles and feral hog hunting? Missouri lawmakers have gone off the railson May 7, 2020 at 2:00 am
They’re spending time on legislation covering raw milk sales, dried venison and the “Kratom Consumer Protection Act.” ...
- Female trophy hunter poses with slaughtered bears and boasts about skinning themon May 5, 2020 at 7:48 am
DISTRESSING IMAGES Alexandra Tyutchevam, from Serpukhov, Russia, has received threats about her trophy hunting but is unapologetic and wants others to share her passion for killing animals ...
- Colorado mountain lions hit with new hunting plan as people spreadon May 3, 2020 at 1:41 pm
Mountain lions face an uncertain future under a new state plan to let hunters kill up to 15% a year across western Colorado, and more near subdivisions — rankling animal rights advocates who ...
- Predator: Hunting Grounds Doesn’t Quite Get to the Chopperon May 2, 2020 at 6:55 am
Hunting Grounds is a unique title. While it's not very good, it's highly addictive. Time will pass you by as you call for "just one ...
- Predator: Hunting Grounds reviewon April 30, 2020 at 6:03 am
Hunting Grounds is a thrilling asymmetrical online shooter, despite lacking the polish of bigger, more established games.
- Middle Eastern funds cut back on trophy hunting in the Weston April 27, 2020 at 9:56 am
The powerful Persian Gulf wealth funds that own key assets in the UK and beyond have had their wings clipped, and despite their financial firepower are unlikely to aggressively pursue trophy assets in ...
- Opinion: Caroline Bushnell: State mountain lion plan should not rely on trophy huntingon April 23, 2020 at 3:46 pm
And the proposed limits are based on scientifically unsound population density estimates, potentially allowing trophy hunting at rates that could harm the survival of Colorado’s mountain lion ...
via Bing News