It is wartime. You and your fellow refugees are hiding from enemy soldiers, when a baby begins to cry. You cover her mouth to block the sound. If you remove your hand, her crying will draw the attention of the soldiers, who will kill everyone. If you smother the child, you’ll save yourself and the others.
If you were in that situation, which was dramatized in the final episode of the ’70s and ’80s TV series “M.A.S.H.,” what would you do?
The results of a new UCLA study suggest that scientists could make a good guess based on how the brain responds when people watch someone else experience pain. The study found that those responses predict whether people will be inclined to avoid causing harm to others when facing moral dilemmas.
“The findings give us a glimpse into what is the nature of morality,” said Dr. Marco Iacoboni, director of the Neuromodulation Lab at UCLA’s Ahmanson-Lovelace Brain Mapping Center and the study’s senior author. “This is a foundational question to understand ourselves, and to understand how the brain shapes our own nature.”
In the study, which was published in Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, Iacoboni and colleagues analyzed mirror neurons, brain cells that respond equally when someone performs an action or simply watches someone else perform the same action. Mirror neurons play a vital role in how people learn through mimicry and feel empathy for others.
When you wince while seeing someone experience pain — a phenomenon called “neural resonance” — mirror neurons are responsible.
Iacoboni wondered if neural resonance might play a role in how people navigate complicated problems that require both conscious deliberation and consideration of another’s feelings.
To find out, researchers showed 19 volunteers two videos: one of a hypodermic needle piercing a hand, and another of a hand being gently touched by a cotton swab. During both, the scientists used a functional MRI machine to measure activity in the volunteers’ brains.
Researchers later asked the participants how they would behave in a variety of moral dilemmas, including the scenario involving the crying baby during wartime, the prospect of torturing another person to prevent a bomb from killing several other people and whether to harm research animals in order to cure AIDS.
Participants also responded to scenarios in which causing harm would make the world worse — inflicting harm on another person in order to avoid two weeks of hard labor, for example — to gauge their willingness to cause harm for moral reasons and for less-noble motives.
Iacoboni and his colleagues hypothesized that people who had greater neural resonance than the other participants while watching the hand-piercing video would also be less likely to choose to silence the baby in the hypothetical dilemma, and that proved to be true. Indeed, people with stronger activity in the inferior frontal cortex, a part of the brain essential for empathy and imitation, were less willing to cause direct harm, such as silencing the baby.
But the researchers found no correlation between people’s brain activity and their willingness to hypothetically harm one person in the interest of the greater good — such as silencing the baby to save more lives. Those decisions are thought to stem from more cognitive, deliberative processes.
The study confirms that genuine concern for others’ pain plays a causal role in moral dilemma judgments, Iacoboni said. In other words, a person’s refusal to silence the baby is due to concern for the baby, not just the person’s own discomfort in taking that action.
Iacoboni’s next project will explore whether a person’s decision-making in moral dilemmas can be influenced by decreasing or enhancing activity in the areas of the brain that were targeted in the current study.
“It would be fascinating to see if we can use brain stimulation to change complex moral decisions through impacting the amount of concern people experience for others’ pain,” Iacoboni said. “It could provide a new method for increasing concern for others’ well-being.”
The research could point to a way to help people with mental disorders such as schizophrenia that make interpersonal communication difficult, Iacoboni said.
The Latest on: Nature of morality
- The Divers’ Game by Jesse Ball review – a parable of violenceon November 15, 2019 at 4:00 am
The moral purpose of the book comes into agonisingly sharp focus in the last section ... Finally, and too late, she realises with revulsion the true nature of her society. “We are maintained by a ...
- The Religion of Liberal Democracyon November 14, 2019 at 8:06 pm
If we want to know about “the nature of things or the rules for living,” Durkheim chided ... Even if “by some incomprehensible miracle” there appeared a moral code to reunite society, the competitive ...
- The Exposure of the Republican Partyon November 13, 2019 at 10:11 pm
It is the degree to which the transgressive nature of Trump—his willingness to go places no other president has gone ... This from the party that once said it stood for objective truth, for honor and ...
- Kapos: Could Jews Be Found Guilty of Partnering With the Nazis?on November 13, 2019 at 9:24 pm
Holding them up as a moral standard imposes another unbearable burden for millions of other innocent ... the Nazi period we feel the need to take sides and separate evil from good. But the impossible ...
- Letters: A moral defense for capital punishmenton November 13, 2019 at 3:00 pm
The article’s first sentence also includes the phrase “summon the better angels of our nature,” referring to Prejean’s appeals. That’s a forthright implication, continued throughout the article, that ...
- Interview: Marianne Williamson on Building an Economics of Loveon November 13, 2019 at 9:51 am
But I’d want my money back. So, when you’re in let’s say Alcoholics Anonymous and you have to take a serious moral inventory, you have to admit the exact nature of your character defects. That’s what ...
- BOOK REVIEW: 'The Lost Soul of the American Presidency'on November 12, 2019 at 11:11 am
TOP STORIES Bill Clinton offers Trump advice on impeachment 'It will go crazy': Finland close to 1st major soccer finals DHS confirms no new border wall yet A distinguished presidential historian, and ...
- Architect Tay Kheng Soon reiterates concern over “loss of moral authority created by high ministerial pay”on November 11, 2019 at 8:40 pm
A more down to earth and human inspiring leadership is needed to regain lost moral authority and trust.” In July, Mr Tay said that he was struck by the “incremental nature” of the 4G leadership’s ...
- ‘the smuggler’: A 9000-Word Rhyming Exploration of Immigration and the American Dreamon November 11, 2019 at 8:28 pm
while still incorporating universal questions of moral compromise. To introduce the characters of this story, from Finnegan’s mother-in-law to the mysterious “X,” Finnegan takes to attempting ...
- Church needed as moral voice as AI technology expands, expert sayson November 10, 2019 at 11:15 pm
What humans have done by our own nature – making and using tools – has now put at risk the natural world ... wealth inequality, automating ethics, moral deskilling, robot consciousness and rights, AGI ...
via Google News and Bing News