New research published today in Nature Geoscience has found that climate engineering that modifies the properties of the land surface in highly populated areas and agricultural areas over North America, Europe and Asia could reduce extreme temperatures there by up to 2-3°C.
The modifications could include lightening buildings, roads and other infrastructure in high population areas and changing crops and engaging in no-till agricultural practices.
Unlike many other climate-engineering methods proposed to tackle climate change, many of these regional modifications have already been tested and proven to work. Critically, this method has fewer risks compared with injecting aerosols into the atmosphere.
“Extreme temperatures are where human and natural systems are most vulnerable. Changing the radiative properties of land helps address this issue with fewer side effects,” said Director of the ARC Centre of Excellence for Climate Extremes, Prof Andy Pitman.
“This research suggests that by taking a regional approach, at least in temperate zones, policy and investment decisions can be pragmatically and affordably focused on areas of greatest need.”
By contrast other proposed forms of large-scale climate engineering, such as spraying sulphate aerosols into the atmosphere, fertilising the ocean with iron and even building giant mirrors in space, have questionable effectiveness and are likely to alter climate systems in unexpected ways. They could make situations worse for some countries.
The researchers gained their results by modelling how changing only the radiative properties of agricultural land and high population areas across North America, Europe and Asia would impact average temperatures, extreme temperatures and precipitation.
The results showed small impacts on average temperatures, little change in precipitation – except in Asia – but significant reductions in extreme temperatures.
“Regional land-based climate engineering can be effective but we need to consider competing demands for land use, for instance for food production, biodiversity, carbon uptake, recreational areas and much more before putting it into effect,” said lead author Prof Sonia Seneviratne of ETH Zurich.
“We must remember land-based climate engineering is not a silver bullet, it is just one part of a possible climate solution, and it would have no effects on global mean warming or ocean acidification. There are still important moral, economic and practical imperatives to consider that mean mitigation and adaption should still remain at the forefront of our approach to dealing with global warming.”
The Latest on: Climate engineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate engineering
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 31, 2019 at 8:19 am
Countries around the world are preparing to modify the earth's climate to cope with climate change, with many proponents touting it as a "public good." According to researchers, including faculty at ...
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 31, 2019 at 7:59 am
According to researchers, including faculty at Binghamton University, State University of New York, calling climate engineering a public good misrepresents the technical definition of a public good ...
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 30, 2019 at 5:00 pm
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect anonymous information. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (browser type, time and date) in order to provide ...
- Climate engineering: International meeting reveals tensionson October 28, 2019 at 5:00 pm
The "hidden politics" of climate engineering were partially revealed earlier this year at the fourth United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA-4), when Switzerland proposed a resolution on ...
- Climate engineering: International meeting reveals tensionson October 28, 2019 at 2:53 pm
At this point, the greatest danger of climate engineering may be how little is known about where countries stand on these potentially planet-altering technologies. Who is moving forward? Who is ...
- Climate Engineering: International Meeting Reveals Tensionson October 28, 2019 at 12:58 pm
At this point, the greatest danger of climate engineering may be how little is known about where countries stand on these potentially planet-altering technologies. At this point, the greatest danger ...
- The hidden politics of climate engineeringon October 28, 2019 at 9:11 am
Governments disagree even on the current state of climate change engineering governance, as became clear at the 2019 United Nations Environment Assembly negotiations. They must develop mechanisms to ...
- Would climate engineering be playing God?on May 5, 2019 at 11:36 pm
But we're getting ahead of ourselves. There are basically two approaches to climate engineering. One is to capture greenhouse gas emissions and bury them. The other, more controversial idea, is to ...
- Climate engineering needs to look at the big picture, says researcheron April 16, 2019 at 7:58 am
among the least studied is climate engineering. An umbrella term for large-scale projects designed to disrupt the Earth's carbon cycle or radiation balance, climate engineering has only relatively ...
via Bing News