A ‘Molecular Trap’ for Capturing Radioactive Iodides in Nuclear Waste
Seeking a better way to capture radioactive iodides in spent nuclear reactor fuel, Rutgers–New Brunswick scientists have developed an extremely efficient “molecular trap” that can be recycled and reused.
The trap is like a tiny, porous super-sponge. The internal surface area of just 1 gram of this material could stretch out to cover five 94-by-50-foot basketball courts, or 23,500 square feet. And, once caught inside, radioactive iodides will remain trapped for eons.
“This type of material has tremendous potential because of its high porosity,” said Jing Li, distinguished professor in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. “It has far more space than a sponge and it can trap lots of stuff.”
Li is corresponding author of a study on molecular traps for nuclear fuel reprocessing that was published in Nature Communications. The first author is Baiyan Li, a former postdoctoral associate in Li’s group, and other Rutgers co-authors include doctoral students Hao Wang and Benjamin J. Deibert.
Reprocessing means separating spent nuclear reactor fuel into materials that may be recycled for use in new nuclear fuel or discarded as waste, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The U.S. has no commercial reprocessing facilities at the moment, but commercial facilities are operating in other countries.
When spent fuel is reprocessed, radioactive molecular iodine and organic iodide gases that pose cancer and environmental risks must be captured and sequestered. The long-lived gases are hard to capture and can leak into the environment, the Rutgers study says.
Solid adsorbents like silver-infused silica, alumina and zeolites can capture iodides, but their low uptake capacity and poor recyclability make them inefficient and costly, according to Li, who works in the School of Arts and Sciences.
It also far outperforms all current industrial materials in adsorbing, or binding to, radioactive organic iodides. For example, its ability to adsorb methyl iodide at 302 degrees Fahrenheit exceeds that of a benchmark industrial product by more than 340 percent.
Another benefit of the Rutgers molecular trap is that captured methyl iodide can be removed from metal-organic frameworks, enabling their recycling and reuse. This is not possible with current industrial products, from which adsorbent must be sequestered along with captured radioactive iodides.
The metal-organic framework is also cheaper than existing products because it doesn’t use silver or other precious metals, and is very robust, able to handle harsh reprocessing conditions such as high temperatures, high acidity and high humidity, Li said.
“We’re off to a very good start and we’d like to make improvements,” Li said. “Eventually, we hope it can be commercialized.”
The Latest on: Nuclear waste reprocessing
- MPs attack ‘lack of knowledge’ over UK nuclear power clean-upon November 26, 2020 at 4:04 pm
MPs have warned there is a “perpetual” lack of knowledge in government about the state of Britain’s 17 earliest nuclear power sites, which are expected to cost taxpayers about £130bn to clean up over ...
- Nuclear waste and nuclear poweron November 24, 2020 at 4:16 pm
I am happy to discuss the question of nuclear waste, as requested by John Collins (Letters, November 21st). Most nuclear waste from power plants is low level (small amounts of short lived ...
- Alternative Uses For Nuclear Wasteon November 24, 2020 at 4:00 pm
The plan involves extracting americium-241 from British waste stocks of plutonium from nuclear fuel reprocessing. While it’s unlikely to be a major project in terms of cleaning up waste ...
- Process Banned By President Carter Could Solve U.S. Nuclear Waste Problemon November 17, 2020 at 5:46 pm
The reprocessing of nuclear waste—a banned process—could solve the problem of its buildup in the United States, according to the head of the Nuclear Energy Institute, Maria Korsnick.
- U.S. nuclear power industry group sees reprocessing as potential waste fixon November 17, 2020 at 2:15 pm
(The Nov. 16 story corrects first sentence to say that commercial reprocessing has not been practiced for decades instead of that it has been banned; corrects paragraph 5 to reflect that Reagan lifted ...
- U.S. nuclear power industry group sees reprocessing as...on November 17, 2020 at 8:11 am
WASHINGTON, Nov 16 (Reuters) - The head of the top U.S. nuclear power group said that reprocessing of nuclear waste, a technique that has not been practiced in the United States for decades because of ...
- U.S. nuclear industry group sees reprocessing as potential nuclear waste fixon November 16, 2020 at 8:11 pm
The head of the top U.S. nuclear power group said that reprocessing of nuclear waste, a technique that has been banned since the 1970s on proliferation concerns, has potential to help address a ...
- U.S. Nuclear Power Industry Group Sees Reprocessing as Potential Waste Fixon November 16, 2020 at 5:48 pm
U.S. Nuclear Power Industry Group Sees Reprocessing as Potential Waste Fix WASHINGTON (Reuters) - (The Nov. 16 story corrects first sentence to say that commercial reprocessing has not been ...
via Google News and Bing News