A ‘Molecular Trap’ for Capturing Radioactive Iodides in Nuclear Waste
Seeking a better way to capture radioactive iodides in spent nuclear reactor fuel, Rutgers–New Brunswick scientists have developed an extremely efficient “molecular trap” that can be recycled and reused.
The trap is like a tiny, porous super-sponge. The internal surface area of just 1 gram of this material could stretch out to cover five 94-by-50-foot basketball courts, or 23,500 square feet. And, once caught inside, radioactive iodides will remain trapped for eons.
“This type of material has tremendous potential because of its high porosity,” said Jing Li, distinguished professor in the Department of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Rutgers University-New Brunswick. “It has far more space than a sponge and it can trap lots of stuff.”
Li is corresponding author of a study on molecular traps for nuclear fuel reprocessing that was published in Nature Communications. The first author is Baiyan Li, a former postdoctoral associate in Li’s group, and other Rutgers co-authors include doctoral students Hao Wang and Benjamin J. Deibert.
Reprocessing means separating spent nuclear reactor fuel into materials that may be recycled for use in new nuclear fuel or discarded as waste, according to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission. The U.S. has no commercial reprocessing facilities at the moment, but commercial facilities are operating in other countries.
When spent fuel is reprocessed, radioactive molecular iodine and organic iodide gases that pose cancer and environmental risks must be captured and sequestered. The long-lived gases are hard to capture and can leak into the environment, the Rutgers study says.
Solid adsorbents like silver-infused silica, alumina and zeolites can capture iodides, but their low uptake capacity and poor recyclability make them inefficient and costly, according to Li, who works in the School of Arts and Sciences.
It also far outperforms all current industrial materials in adsorbing, or binding to, radioactive organic iodides. For example, its ability to adsorb methyl iodide at 302 degrees Fahrenheit exceeds that of a benchmark industrial product by more than 340 percent.
Another benefit of the Rutgers molecular trap is that captured methyl iodide can be removed from metal-organic frameworks, enabling their recycling and reuse. This is not possible with current industrial products, from which adsorbent must be sequestered along with captured radioactive iodides.
The metal-organic framework is also cheaper than existing products because it doesn’t use silver or other precious metals, and is very robust, able to handle harsh reprocessing conditions such as high temperatures, high acidity and high humidity, Li said.
“We’re off to a very good start and we’d like to make improvements,” Li said. “Eventually, we hope it can be commercialized.”
The Latest on: Nuclear waste reprocessing
- Engineering construction erector/rigger on November 12, 2018 at 4:23 am
nuclear waste reprocessing; the processing and production of chemicals; pharmaceuticals; human and animal food; cosmetics; petrochemicals; sewerage, steel mill, the exploration and exploitation of oil ... […]
- Sellafield Ltd’s collaboration between people, supply chain, academia and stakeholders has led to twelve months of progress on November 7, 2018 at 10:06 pm
Thorp –an incredible feat of British engineering – will stop reprocessing spent nuclear fuel this November ... This involves receiving, treating, recycling and packaging nuclear waste and the safeguar... […]
- 12+ Of The Most Radioactive Places on Earth on November 6, 2018 at 12:45 am
Heavily contaminated waste mining products were buried ... Today it is used a nuclear fuel reprocessing and decommissioning site and is located close to the small village of Seascale on the ... […]
- Rosen: Trump does not understand the impact of Yucca Mountain on Nevadans on November 2, 2018 at 2:36 am
Federal law currently designates Yucca Mountain as the nation’s nuclear waste repository, Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said after a rally with Tarkanian at a Nevada GOP office that reprocessing ... […]
- We should move toward nuclear reprocessing on November 1, 2018 at 12:23 am
The recycling of nuclear waste ultimately poses little to no military risk. The greater issue in the U.S. is the financial viability of reprocessing. Not only would new facilities need to be built to ... […]
- Sellafield nuclear decommissioning work ‘significantly’ delayed and nearly £1bn over budget, report reveals on October 30, 2018 at 1:04 pm
Nuclear fuel reprocessing and decommissioning site Sellafield is running ... is used for cleaning up stored nuclear waste. The plant opened in 1956 and has been state-run since 2016. It is due to be f... […]
- What’s the situation at Russia’s nuclear fuel dump in Andreeva Bay? on September 7, 2018 at 8:19 am
The nuclear waste storage, which is located only about 55 km from the ... where the deadly materials will be reloaded onto special trains and sent to reprocessing plant Mayak. “It is a big day for the ... […]
- Japanese utilities stop funding for nuclear fuel reprocessing on September 4, 2018 at 4:08 am
For the reprocessing of spent MOX fuel ... But if spent MOX fuel is not reprocessed, it would be considered nuclear waste, raising concerns over how to deal with it. […]
- Nuclear waste could be buried underneath national parks on July 30, 2018 at 11:20 pm
Image: The Sellafield nuclear reprocessing facility is in the process of being decommissioned In the past the Lake District national park is one that has been considered for nuclear waste disposal bec... […]
- Recycling nuclear waste is not the win-win it seems like it should be on May 6, 2018 at 2:05 am
The idea of turning Yucca Mountain into a nuclear waste reprocessing facility, which some Nevadans are proposing, sounds wonderful. It would work like this: Instead of being a place where used nuclear ... […]
via Google News and Bing News