Extent of spin in biomedical scientific papers revealed
More than a quarter of biomedical scientific papers may utilise practices that distort the interpretation of results or mislead readers so that results are viewed more favourably, a new University of Sydney study suggests.
Researchers from the University’s multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy reviewed 35 published academic studies of so-called ‘spin’ in biomedical scientific papers – also known as ‘science hype’.
Their findings, published in PLOS Biology, found more than 26 percent of papers identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses contained spin. This figure rose to up to 84 percent in papers reporting on nonrandomised trials.
While spin was variably defined across the 35 studies, a wide variety of strategies to spin results were identified including:
- making inappropriate claims about statistically non-significant results
- making inappropriate recommendations for clinical practice that were not supported by study results
- attributing causality when that was not possible
- selective reporting, such as emphasising only statistically significant or subsets of data in the conclusions
- presenting data in a more favourable light than was warranted, for example writing overly optimistic abstracts, misleadingly describing the study design and underreporting adverse events.
Impact and factors contributing to spin need to be determined
Of the 35 studies reviewed, 19 examined whether particular factors were associated with the presence of spin – however the factors were considered too wide-ranging and unrelated to draw conclusions.
Most of the factors also focused on the characteristics of the individual scientists, journals or studies rather than broader issues in the sector, said co-author Professor Lisa Bero from the Faculty of Pharmacy and research group leader of the Charle’s Perkins Centre’s Evidence, Policy and Influence Collaborative.
“The contribution of research incentives and reward structures – for example financial and reputational – that rely on ‘positive’ conclusions in order to publish and garner media attention is yet to be addressed,” she said.
We see an urgent need for further research to determine the institutional or cultural factors that could contribute to such a high prevalence of spin in scientific literature – and to better understand the potential impact of spin on research, clinical practice and policy.Professor Lisa Bero
Lead author, Honours graduate Kellia Chiu, said researchers, peer reviewers and editors had a responsibility to remain constantly alert for spin.
“The scientific academic community would benefit from the development of tools that help us effectively identify spin and ensure accurate and impartial portrayal and interpretation of results,” she said.
“Publishing data alongside multiple interpretations of the data from multiple researchers is one way to be transparent about the occurrence of spin.”
The Latest on: Science spin
via Google News
The Latest on: Science spin
- ‘Wander Darkly’ Review: Sienna Miller Grounds an Unwieldy Dark Spin on ‘Eternal Sunshine’on January 25, 2020 at 10:51 am
The film’s obvious and immediate forbearers range from Michel Gondry’s “Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind” and “The Science of Sleep,” to shlockier fare like “Stay ... journey back into their ...
- Ultrafast optically induced spin transfer in ferromagnetic alloyson January 17, 2020 at 11:11 am
2 Graduate School of Excellence Materials Science in Mainz, Staudinger Weg 9 ... See allHide authors and affiliations The vision of using light to manipulate electronic and spin excitations in ...
- Can Anything Really Stop the Science Spin Snowball?on July 18, 2019 at 12:28 am
But if even people who do science for a living have trouble making correct inferences and claims from their data, we’re expecting rather a lot from non-scientists, aren’t we? In a way, calling all ...
- Mad Science, Spin, Pop, Boom!on June 23, 2018 at 7:00 am
Join Mad Science for their interactive science show featuring bubbling potions and popping chemical chain reactions that will educate and entertain the entire family. Event Cost: Free. Event Time: 2-3 ...
- Science Spin Prevalent, Researchers Warnon September 13, 2017 at 8:07 am
Researchers from the University of Sydney's multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy reviewed 35 published academic studies of so-called 'spin' in biomedical scientific ...
- Science spin prevalent, researchers warnon September 12, 2017 at 5:00 pm
Researchers from the University's multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy reviewed 35 published academic studies of so-called 'spin ... also known as 'science hype'.
- Science spin prevalent, researchers warnon September 12, 2017 at 4:00 pm
University of Sydney. (2017, September 12). Science spin prevalent, researchers warn: Extent of spin in biomedical scientific papers revealed. ScienceDaily. Retrieved December 18, 2019 from ...
- DowDuPont to spin off material science in 18 monthson September 5, 2017 at 6:14 am
The development will mark the birth of a material science spin-off, to be named Dow, which will consist of the businesses comprising the following current Dow operating segments: performance ...
- DowDuPont to spin off material science in 18 monthson September 4, 2017 at 7:00 pm
The development will mark the birth of a material science spin-off, to be named Dow, which will consist of the businesses comprising the following current Dow operating segments: performance plastics; ...
via Bing News