Extent of spin in biomedical scientific papers revealed
More than a quarter of biomedical scientific papers may utilise practices that distort the interpretation of results or mislead readers so that results are viewed more favourably, a new University of Sydney study suggests.
Researchers from the University’s multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy reviewed 35 published academic studies of so-called ‘spin’ in biomedical scientific papers – also known as ‘science hype’.
Their findings, published in PLOS Biology, found more than 26 percent of papers identified as systematic reviews or meta-analyses contained spin. This figure rose to up to 84 percent in papers reporting on nonrandomised trials.
While spin was variably defined across the 35 studies, a wide variety of strategies to spin results were identified including:
- making inappropriate claims about statistically non-significant results
- making inappropriate recommendations for clinical practice that were not supported by study results
- attributing causality when that was not possible
- selective reporting, such as emphasising only statistically significant or subsets of data in the conclusions
- presenting data in a more favourable light than was warranted, for example writing overly optimistic abstracts, misleadingly describing the study design and underreporting adverse events.
Impact and factors contributing to spin need to be determined
Of the 35 studies reviewed, 19 examined whether particular factors were associated with the presence of spin – however the factors were considered too wide-ranging and unrelated to draw conclusions.
Most of the factors also focused on the characteristics of the individual scientists, journals or studies rather than broader issues in the sector, said co-author Professor Lisa Bero from the Faculty of Pharmacy and research group leader of the Charle’s Perkins Centre’s Evidence, Policy and Influence Collaborative.
“The contribution of research incentives and reward structures – for example financial and reputational – that rely on ‘positive’ conclusions in order to publish and garner media attention is yet to be addressed,” she said.
We see an urgent need for further research to determine the institutional or cultural factors that could contribute to such a high prevalence of spin in scientific literature – and to better understand the potential impact of spin on research, clinical practice and policy.Professor Lisa Bero
Lead author, Honours graduate Kellia Chiu, said researchers, peer reviewers and editors had a responsibility to remain constantly alert for spin.
“The scientific academic community would benefit from the development of tools that help us effectively identify spin and ensure accurate and impartial portrayal and interpretation of results,” she said.
“Publishing data alongside multiple interpretations of the data from multiple researchers is one way to be transparent about the occurrence of spin.”
The Latest on: Science spin
via Google News
The Latest on: Science spin
- López Obrador calls for ‘moral regeneration’ of Mexicoon November 30, 2019 at 10:00 pm
“I think this book was very necessary because he has to defend his lack of results,” said María Eugenia Valdés Vega, a political-science professor at the UAM Iztapalapa university ... year is the ...
- 'Spotting the spin': Why disinformation works in our brains – and how not to get dupedon November 26, 2019 at 12:00 pm
Her 10-12 minute slide presentation, which touches on such disparate historical characters such as Moses and Franklin Roosevelt, seeks to illustrate the science of how Americans gets duped – and how ...
- Can Anything Stop the Science Spin Snowball?on July 21, 2019 at 5:00 pm
With each set of hands study results pass through, there is a chance for another layer of spin to be added or chipped away. Adding is awfully common, though. By the time it gets to the press release ...
- Can Anything Really Stop the Science Spin Snowball?on July 18, 2019 at 12:28 am
But if even people who do science for a living have trouble making correct inferences and claims from their data, we’re expecting rather a lot from non-scientists, aren’t we? In a way, calling all ...
- BECAUSE SCIENCE Spin-Off BECAUSE SPACE Comes to Nerdiston May 9, 2019 at 7:57 am
If you’re a sucker for science fact or science fiction, chances are you’re already a fan of our show, Because Science. If not, what are you waiting for?! Each week, science communicator and host Kyle ...
- Mad Science, Spin, Pop, Boom!on June 23, 2018 at 7:00 am
Join Mad Science for their interactive science show featuring bubbling potions and popping chemical chain reactions that will educate and entertain the entire family. Event Cost: Free. Event Time: 2-3 ...
- Science spin prevalent, researchers warnon September 11, 2017 at 11:08 am
Researchers from the University's multidisciplinary Charles Perkins Centre and Faculty of Pharmacy reviewed 35 published academic studies of so-called 'spin' in biomedical scientific papers - also ...
- Watch out for hype—science 'spin' prevalent, researchers warnon September 11, 2017 at 11:01 am
More than a quarter of biomedical scientific papers may utilise practices that distort the interpretation of results or mislead readers so that results are viewed more favourably, a new study, ...
- Weekly Reader Launches Science Spin To Bring Timely Science News To Elementary School Studentson February 17, 2016 at 9:14 pm
Weekly Reader: The Largest Newspaper For Kids In The World ® announces the launch of Science Spin, a monthly, grade-specific publication that helps teachers update their science curriculum and brings ...
via Bing News