In debates over the future of artificial intelligence, many experts think of the new systems as coldly logical and objectively rational. But in a new study, researchers have demonstrated how machines can be reflections of us, their creators, in potentially problematic ways.
Common machine learning programs, when trained with ordinary human language available online, can acquire cultural biases embedded in the patterns of wording, the researchers found. These biases range from the morally neutral, like a preference for flowers over insects, to the objectionable views of race and gender.
Identifying and addressing possible bias in machine learning will be critically important as we increasingly turn to computers for processing the natural language humans use to communicate, for instance in doing online text searches, image categorization and automated translations.
“Questions about fairness and bias in machine learning are tremendously important for our society,” said researcher Arvind Narayanan, an assistant professor of computer science and an affiliated faculty member at the Center for Information Technology Policy (CITP) at Princeton University, as well as an affiliate scholar at Stanford Law School’s Center for Internet and Society. “We have a situation where these artificial intelligence systems may be perpetuating historical patterns of bias that we might find socially unacceptable and which we might be trying to move away from.”
The paper, “Semantics derived automatically from language corpora contain human-like biases,” published April 14 in Science. Its lead author is Aylin Caliskan, a postdoctoral research associate and a CITP fellow at Princeton; Joanna Bryson, a reader at University of Bath, and CITP affiliate, is a coauthor.
As a touchstone for documented human biases, the study turned to the Implicit Association Test, used in numerous social psychology studies since its development at the University of Washington in the late 1990s. The test measures response times (in milliseconds) by human subjects asked to pair word concepts displayed on a computer screen. Response times are far shorter, the Implicit Association Test has repeatedly shown, when subjects are asked to pair two concepts they find similar, versus two concepts they find dissimilar.
Take flower types, like “rose” and “daisy,” and insects like “ant” and “moth.” These words can be paired with pleasant concepts, like “caress” and “love,” or unpleasant notions, like “filth” and “ugly.” People more quickly associate the flower words with pleasant concepts, and the insect terms with unpleasant ideas.
The Princeton team devised an experiment with a program where it essentially functioned like a machine learning version of the Implicit Association Test. Called GloVe, and developed by Stanford University researchers, the popular, open-source program is of the sort that a startup machine learning company might use at the heart of its product. The GloVe algorithm can represent the co-occurrence statistics of words in, say, a 10-word window of text. Words that often appear near one another have a stronger association than those words that seldom do.
The Stanford researchers turned GloVe loose on a huge trawl of contents from the World Wide Web, containing 840 billion words. Within this large sample of written human culture, Narayanan and colleagues then examined sets of so-called target words, like “programmer, engineer, scientist” and “nurse, teacher, librarian” alongside two sets of attribute words, such as “man, male” and “woman, female,” looking for evidence of the kinds of biases humans can unwittingly possess.
The Latest on: Bias in artificial intelligence systems
via Google News
The Latest on: Bias in artificial intelligence systems
- What Video, Artificial Intelligence And Automation Mean For The Future Of Recruitingon October 17, 2019 at 5:32 am
While video interviews have been around for some time, recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and automation are able to streamline and ... and creating opportunities that encourage ...
- DELGADO | Artificial Intelligence’s Exclusivity Issueon October 7, 2019 at 5:21 pm
University of Amsterdam Prof. Frederik Zuiderveen Borgesius, law, argued that utilizing artificial intelligence in fields like policing and criminal justice, where bias is already heavily present, ...
- ABTV Crossfire debate: Does bias in artificial intelligence exist?on September 26, 2019 at 8:24 am
The second and the most scientific reason for human bias bleeding into artificial intelligence and other systems is data sets. AI systems are only as good as the data we put into them. Bad data can ...
- Artificial Intelligence has a gender bias problem – just ask Sirion September 22, 2019 at 2:14 am
are at the cutting edge of marketable artificial intelligence (AI). AI refers to using technological systems to perform tasks that people usually would. They function as an application on a smart ...
- South Africa: Artificial Intelligence Has a Gender Bias Problem - Just Ask Sirion September 21, 2019 at 5:00 pm
In South Africa, where I live and conduct my research into gender biases in artificial intelligence ... I picked up in engineering." Bias and discrimination in AI It is being increasingly acknowledged ...
- How Bias Distorts AI (Artificial Intelligence)on August 5, 2019 at 7:35 pm
When it comes to AI (Artificial Intelligence), there’s usually a major focus ... Can you share some real-life examples of bias in AI systems and explain how it gets there? It’s a common misconception ...
- Government Should Address Potential Bias in Artificial Intelligence, Lawmakers Sayon July 24, 2019 at 12:47 pm
Bias in artificial intelligence could critically impact the deployment ... then we shouldn't have a black box sort of AI system,” Heinrich said. He explained that when it comes to using AI and machine ...
- Artificial Intelligence Has a Problem With Gender and Racial Bias. Here’s How to Solve Iton February 7, 2019 at 4:01 am
These systems are often trained on images of predominantly light-skinned men. And so, I decided to share my experience of the coded gaze, the bias in artificial intelligence that can lead to ...
- The Seductive Diversion of ‘Solving’ Bias in Artificial Intelligenceon December 6, 2018 at 4:00 pm
One is about artificial intelligence — the golden promise ... Second, even apparent success in tackling bias can have perverse consequences. Take the example of a facial recognition system that works ...
via Bing News