Doctors for the first time can determine which medication is more likely to help a patient overcome depression, according to research that pushes the medical field beyond what has essentially been a guessing game of prescribing antidepressants.
A blood test that measures a certain type of protein level provides an immediate tool for physicians who until now have relied heavily on patient questionnaires to choose a treatment, said Dr. Madhukar Trivedi, who led the research at UT Southwestern Medical Center’s Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care.
“Currently, our selection of depression medications is not any more superior than flipping a coin, and yet that is what we do. Now we have a biological explanation to guide treatment of depression,” said Dr. Trivedi, Director of the depression center, a cornerstone of UT Southwestern’s Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute.
The study demonstrated that measuring a patient’s C-reactive protein (CRP) levels through a simple finger-prick blood test can help doctors prescribe a medication that is more likely to work. Utilizing this test in clinical visits could lead to a significant boost in the success rate of depressed patients who commonly struggle to find effective treatments.
A major national study Dr. Trivedi led more than a decade ago (STAR*D) gives insight into the prevalence of the problem: Up to a third of depressed patients don’t improve during their first medication, and about 40 percent of people who start taking antidepressants stop taking them within three months.
“This outcome happens because they give up,” said Dr. Trivedi, whose previous national study established widely accepted treatment guidelines for depressed patients. “Giving up hope is really a central symptom of the disease. However, if treatment selection is tied to a blood test and improves outcomes, patients are more likely to continue the treatment and achieve the benefit.”
The new research published in Psychoneuroendocrinology measured remission rates of more than 100 depressed patients prescribed either escitalopram alone or escitalopram plus bupropion. Researchers found a strong correlation between CRP levels and which drug regimen improved their symptoms:
- For patients whose CRP levels were less than 1 milligram per liter, escitalopram alone was more effective: 57 percent remission rate compared to less than 30 percent on the other drug.
- For patients with higher CRP levels, escitalopram plus bupropion was more likely to work: 51 percent remission rate compared to 33 percent on escitalopram alone.
Dr. Trivedi noted that these results could readily apply to other commonly used antidepressants.
“These findings provide evidence that a biological test can immediately be used in clinical practice,” he said.
Dr. Trivedi identified CRP as a potential marker for depression treatments because it has been an effective measure of inflammation for other disorders such as cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
While previous research to establish CRP as an antidepressant marker used levels three to five times higher than the latest study, “my theory was that you don’t need that high of an inflammation to experience the sickness of depression,” Dr. Trivedi said. “Even a little inflammation may be sufficient for the patients to experience some of these symptoms of depression.”
The next step is to conduct larger studies to verify CRP’s role with other antidepressants and find alternative markers where CRP does not prove effective. Dr. Trivedi said these studies could lead to additional useful biological tests that can be used in practice.
“Both patients and primary-care providers are very desperately looking for markers that would indicate there is some biology involved in this disease. Otherwise, we are talking about deciding treatments from question-and-answer from the patients, and that is not sufficient,” said Dr. Trivedi, a Professor of Psychiatry who holds the Betty Jo Hay Distinguished Chair in Mental Health and is the inaugural holder of the Julie K. Hersh Chair for Depression Research and Clinical Care.
The data reviewed for the study came from the CO-MED trial, which was funded by the National Institute of Mental Health. The work was also supported through UT Southwestern’s Center for Depression Research and Clinical Care and The Hersh Foundation.
Other UT Southwestern researchers include Dr. Manish Jha, Dr. Abu Taher Minhajuddin, Dr. Bharathi Gadad, Dr. Tracy Greer, Bruce Grannemann, Dr. Abigail Soyombo and Taryn Mayes. Dr. A. John Rush, Professor Emeritus, Duke-National University of Singapore also collaborated on the publication.
“With advances in technology and our understanding of the biology of depression, our ongoing work with additional biomarkers is likely to yield tests for other subtypes of depression,” said Dr. Jha, Assistant Professor of Psychiatry.
The Latest on: Depression
via Google News
The Latest on: Depression
- The Fed is running out of options to stave off a coronavirus depressionon March 23, 2020 at 9:20 am
Nothing is working as the US central bank tries to pull the markets out of a slump ...
- Researchers discover new drug to ease medication side effects against severe depressionon March 23, 2020 at 8:55 am
A new substance has been discovered by a team of researchers that could ease the serious side effects of the medication or the drugs taken by patients for treating severe depression The severe form of ...
- Frontline healthcare workers in China report high rates of anxiety, stress, depression, and insomnia since the coronavirus outbreak beganon March 23, 2020 at 8:04 am
A new study of 1,257 healthcare workers in 34 hospitals in China found that many people treating patients with the new coronavirus experienced symptoms of depression, anxiety, and insomnia. 71% of all ...
- US Facing A Depression? Coronavirus Could Force Federal Government To Take Massive Actionon March 23, 2020 at 8:03 am
Checks to taxpayers are just a Band-Aid, experts agree, but they may make the difference between recession and depression.
- This was the fastest 30% sell-off ever, exceeding the pace of declines during the Great Depressionon March 23, 2020 at 7:22 am
The second, third and fourth quickest 30% pullbacks all occurred during the Great Depression era, according to data from Bank of America Securities.
- How to Prevent a Coronavirus Depressionon March 23, 2020 at 2:13 am
If we keep up our current strategy, our economy will die. Covid-19, the most threatening pandemic of the past century, has precipitated both a health crisis and an economic crisis. The strategies that ...
- Second quarter economic data in the US to tumble to Great Depression era levels: Charles Schwab's Liz Ann Sonderson March 23, 2020 at 1:24 am
Markets are experiencing a "monster mashup" of the worst financial periods in history, says Liz Ann Sonders from Charles Schwab. The spread of the coronavirus, together with the carnage in the credit ...
- COVID-19 Could Cost U.S. $7 Trillion, Cause Worst Job Losses Since the Depression, Professor Estimateson March 22, 2020 at 9:24 pm
"Without vigorous steps, the CDC estimates the COVID-19 will infect 70 to 150 million Americans," Michael Hicks tells Newsweek. "This would have enormous economic costs." ...
- Echoes of Great Depression as Australian jobless queue for helpon March 22, 2020 at 8:03 pm
Jobless Australians flooded unemployment offices around the country Monday as Prime Minister Scott Morrison warned the coronavirus pandemic would cause an economic crisis akin to the Great Depression.
via Bing News