Bringing back extinct species could lead to biodiversity loss rather than gain, according to work featuring University of Queensland researchers.
UQ scientist Professor Hugh Possingham said the research suggested further stretching already-strained conservation budgets to cover the costs of de-extinction could endanger extant species (species still in existence).
“If the risk of failure and the costs associated with establishing viable populations could also be calculated, estimates of potential net losses or missed opportunities would probably be considerably higher,” Professor Possingham said.
“De-extinction could be useful for inspiring new science and could be beneficial for conservation if we ensure it doesn’t reduce existing conservation resources.
“However, in general it is best if we focus on the many species that need our help now.”
“Given the considerable potential for missed opportunity, and risks inherent in assuming a resurrected species would fulfil its role as an ecosystem engineer or flagship species, it is unlikely that de-extinction could be justified on grounds of biodiversity conservation.”
The study was led by Dr Joseph Bennett, formerly of the ARC Centre for Environmental Decisions at UQ and now of Carleton University, Canada.
It analysed the number of species governments in New Zealand and New South Wales could afford to conserve.
“We based cost estimates on recently extinct species and similar extant species,” Dr Bennett said.
The Lord Howe pigeon, eastern bettong, bush moa and Waitomo frog were among the extinct species included in calculations.
The researchers found reintroducing some recently extinct species to their old habitats might improve biodiversity locally, but government-funded conservation for 11 focal extinct species in New Zealand would sacrifice conservation for nearly three times as many (31) extant species.
External funding for conservation of the five focal extinct NSW species could instead be used to conserve more than eight times as many (42) extant species.
Although the technology for de-extinction is still some way off, the research found that careful thought would be required about what species to reintroduce, and where.
Receive an email update when we add a new EXTINCT SPECIES article.
The Latest on: De-extinction
via Google News
The Latest on: De-extinction
- Comment: Science needs to be more dangerouson June 18, 2020 at 5:11 pm
The Thylacine stands as an icon of extinction and martyr to the conservation cause. Should de-extinction succeed, extinction as a concept will be extinguished- what will conservation stand for then?
- Lesson 4: Creative Science – Dragon Eggs Found in the Arcticon June 18, 2020 at 5:00 pm
What don’t we have? (Dinosaur DNA) What kinds of animals can we already clone? (sheep, pigs, cattle, frogs, dogs) What does de-extinction mean? (bringing back an entire species) Why should we be ...
- Arts & Culture Newsletter: Kennedy Center’s ‘Couch Concerts,’ Timken’s ‘Curator’s Corner’ and moreon June 11, 2020 at 5:49 am
a controversial effort she calls “de-extinction” and about which she is dubious. She seeks to cut through the hyperbole to arm people — especially policymakers - with the facts so they can ...
- The Case Against Marson May 26, 2020 at 8:52 am
Again, the point is not limited to space cowboys. Most techno-utopians—the giddier boosters of geoengineering, Artificial Superintelligence, nanotech, de-extinction, genetic enhancement, you name ...
- Glimpse: How An Army of Resurrected Mammoths Could Curb Global Warmingon September 27, 2018 at 9:14 am
This possibility is explored in Sebastian Moller, the third episode of Glimpse, a new original sci-fi series from Futurism Studios ... Current de-extinction proposals rely on surrogate mothers ...
- 9 Extinct Animals That Could Be Resurrected One Dayon September 26, 2018 at 9:47 am
De-extinction started showing promise as early as 2003, when a mountain goat that had gone extinct three years before was reborn in a lab, though it died minutes later. There are ethical ...
- Scientists: We Shouldn't Bring Back Extinct Specieson May 8, 2017 at 3:48 am
Earlier this month, the media was abuzz about “de-extinction,” after Harvard scientist George Church claimed we’d be able to grow a (probably non-viable) wooly mammoth embryo in the next few ...
- The dawn of de-extinction. Are you ready?on February 28, 2017 at 10:15 pm
First off, Ryan and I decided to create a nonprofit called Revive and Restore that would push de-extinction generally and try to have it go in a responsible way, and we would push ahead with the ...
- Before We Build Jurassic World We Need To Study Recent Extinctionson June 9, 2015 at 9:07 am
Massive people-eaters escaping their bonds and ravaging humanity may make good cinema but the arguments both for and against de-extinction are more subtle and wide ranging. De-extinction is based ...
via Bing News