The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOM article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- Uber Freight Publishes Its Inaugural Facility Insights Report on June 20, 2019 at 7:35 am
Uber Freight's Facility Ratings is intended to make the freight marketplace more transparent by leveraging crowd-sourced information about tens ... in Uber Freight's statistics turns conventional ... […]
- Alation Earns Top Ranking in End-User Study of the Data Catalog Market for Third Consecutive Year on June 20, 2019 at 6:00 am
Wisdom of Crowds® research is based on data collected on usage and deployment trends, products and vendors. As with all of its Wisdom of Crowds® Market Studies, Dresner constructed a survey ... […]
- Commentary: Harvard’s false path to wisdom on June 20, 2019 at 5:30 am
He became a student face for the gun rights crowd. The Miami Herald asked if he should be spared ... Knowledge comes by memorizing information and is measurable by GPA. Wisdom comes through a ... […]
- Give War a Chance on June 20, 2019 at 3:19 am
The conventional wisdom on the Democratic side is largely ... that perfectly showcased his political strengths. He got the crowd—the Fox News–selected crowd—to give a show of approval ... […]
- Domo Named an Overall Leader in 2019 Dresner Wisdom of Crowds® BI Market Study on June 18, 2019 at 11:29 pm
SILICON SLOPES, Utah—June 18, 2019 – Domo (NASDAQ: DOMO), provider of the leading cloud-based operating system for business, today announced it has received its third consecutive perfect ... […]
- Harvard’s False Path to Wisdom on June 18, 2019 at 2:44 pm
He became a student face for the gun rights crowd. He’s handled himself with an earnest sincerity ... Knowledge comes by memorizing information and is measurable by G.P.A. Wisdom comes through a ... […]
- Can the Wisdom of Crowds Correct Positive Bias of China’s State-run Media? on June 18, 2019 at 6:02 am
Autocratic regimes control traditional media and use optimistically biased news reports – including corporate news – to strengthen their political power. This is because they know negative news can ... […]
- Pyramid Analytics Recognized as an Overall Leader in 2019 Dresner Wisdom of Crowds® Business Intelligence Market Study on June 12, 2019 at 6:00 am
SEATTLE, June 12, 2019 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Pyramid Analytics, provider of the next-generation business analytics platform for the enterprise, announced today it has been recognized for the fifth ... […]
- The wisdom of the great unwashed? on June 9, 2019 at 9:08 am
There is wisdom in the crowd. “Consensus forecasts” is one modern reincarnation; but now it is the average of a “crowd of experts.” The “Delphi method” goes further by using a crowd of experts who, in ... […]
via Bing News