The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Crowd wisdom such as what might arise from online voting is popularly assumed to provide better answers than any one person by aggregating multiple perspectives. Democratic methods, however, tend to favor the most popular information, not necessarily the most correct. The ignorance of the masses can cancel out a knowledgeable minority with specialized information of a topic, resulting in the wrong answer becoming the most accepted.
To give more weight to correct information that may not be widely known, researchers from Princeton University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology have developed what they call the “surprisingly popular” algorithm. Reported in the journal Nature Jan. 25, the technique hinges on asking people two things about a given question: What do they think the right answer is, and how popular do they think each answer will be?
The correct answer is that which is more popular than people predict, the researchers report. The technique could refine wisdom-of-crowds surveys, which are used in political and economic forecasting, as well as many other collective activities, from pricing artwork to grading scientific research proposals.
The researchers tested their algorithm through multiple surveys conducted on various populations. In one test, they asked people a yes-or-no question, Is Philadelphia the capital of Pennsylvania? Respondents also were asked to predict the prevalence of “yes” votes. Because Philadelphia is a “large, historically significant city,” most people in the group thought that, yes, it is the capital of Pennsylvania — Harrisburg is in fact the state’s capital. In addition, the people who mistakenly thought Philadelphia is the state capital also predicted that a very high percentage of people would answer “yes.”
Meanwhile, a certain number of respondents knew that the correct answer is “no.” But these people also anticipated that many other people would incorrectly think the capital is Philadelphia, so they also expected a very high percentage of “yes” answers. Thus, almost everyone expected other people to answer “yes,” but the actual percentage of people who did was significantly lower. “No” was the surprisingly popular answer because it exceeded expectations of what the answer would be.
Sebastian Seung, Princeton’s Evnin Professor in Neuroscience and professor of computer science and the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, said that the surprisingly popular, or SP, method is still democratic because there is no expectation of who would have specialized information, only that the information exists. Seung added that the researchers’ work was published 110 years after Nature published the seminal paper in crowd wisdom, Sir Francis Galton’s 1907 study “The Wisdom of Crowds.”
“The SP method is elitist in the sense that it tries to identify those who have expert knowledge,” Seung said. “However, it is democratic in the sense that potentially anyone could be identified as an expert. The method does not look at anyone’s resume or academic degrees.”
The researchers developed their method mathematically then applied it through surveys on multiple groups of people, including U.S. state capitals, general knowledge, medical diagnoses and art auction estimates.
Across all topics, the researchers found that the “surprisingly popular” algorithm reduced errors by 21.3 percent compared to simple majority votes, and by 24.2 percent compared to basic confidence-weighted votes (where people express how confident they are in their answers). It also reduced errors by 22.2 percent compared to answers with the highest average confidence levels. On the 50 test questions related to state capitals — such as the Harrisburg-Philadelphia question — the SP method reduced incorrect decisions by 48 percent compared to the majority vote.
“The argument in this paper, in a very rough sense, is that people who expect to be in the minority deserve some extra attention,” said co-author Drazen Prelec, a professor at the MIT Sloan School of Management as well as of economics and brain and cognitive sciences. “In situations where there is enough information in the crowd to determine the correct answer to a question, that answer will be the one [that] most outperforms expectations.”
Aurelien Baillon, a professor of economics at Erasmus University in Rotterdam who is familiar with the new paper but had no role in it, said that the researchers’ work “opens up completely new ways to think about an old problem.” The paper is persuasive because it contains both theoretical arguments “and empirical evidence that it works well,” Baillon said.
Receive an email update when we add a new CROWD WISDOM article.
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
via Google News
The Latest on: Crowd wisdom
- Four Depictions of Discipleship – A Homily for the 23rd Sunday of the Yearon September 7, 2019 at 1:49 pm
This wisdom is already evident if we consider that even in this ... In today’s Gospel Jesus is teaching a big crowd in a way that is meant to distinguish true disciples from those merely giving lip ...
- As Sanders vies for the left in NH, Biden is at home in the middleon September 6, 2019 at 5:30 pm
“Wisdom is in the middle,” said Ron Lyman ... Before Biden jogged to the front of the crowd, everyone stood for the pledge of allegiance. For over an hour on Friday, the former vice president ...
- Polls Aren’t Perfect, But They’re More Accurate Than Lawn Signs and Crowd Sizeon September 6, 2019 at 8:00 am
I’m afraid I mocked her unmercifully at the time: Peggy gets deep into Wisdom, a close friend of ... turn touched the hem of Mitt’s garment! Crowds are big! At this point, I’m thinking ...
- Unhappy with your travel loyalty program? Join the crowd.on September 5, 2019 at 9:48 am
Rewards program enthusiasts take to blogs and online forums to celebrate the loyalty lifestyle, angrily shouting down anyone who dares to question the wisdom of their choices. But an increasing number ...
- Tapping the wisdom of crowdson September 5, 2019 at 7:00 am
In 1714 the British government offered a £20,000 prize to anyone who could develop a method that would allow seafarers to find their longitude to within half a degree. The prize was eventually awarded ...
- Father of wisdom for Scott Morrisonon September 5, 2019 at 4:44 am
Prime Minister Scott Morrison watching his beloved sharks. Picture: AAP The Prime Minister cannot be part of the sold-out Leichhardt Oval crowd — in the inner-western Sydney heartland of those Balmain ...
- VIDEO: Lively crowd greets Ruth Bader Ginsburg in North Little Rockon September 4, 2019 at 5:15 am
Former President Bill Clinton, back in his home state Tuesday to introduce the U.S. Supreme Court justice he nominated in 1993 to a capacity crowd at Verizon Arena in ... common sense, wisdom" and "an ...
- Opinion | The flawed wisdom of adopting a me-too strategyon September 3, 2019 at 11:02 am
In his 2004 book, The Wisdom Of Crowds, James Surowiecki makes an elegant case for letting the push of the many prevail, by and large, over the tug of a few. It’s what an open market has in common ...
- BE THE ONE IN THE CROWDon September 2, 2019 at 4:25 am
Daily make additions in this best treasure consisting of your talent, skills, worth, knowledge and wisdom by consistently daily learning ... Make yourself such that you get identified in a crowd.
via Bing News