Researchers at Columbia University, Princeton and Harvard University have developed a new approach for analyzing big data that can drastically improve the ability to make accurate predictions about medicine, complex diseases, social science phenomena, and other issues.
In a study published in the December 13 issue of Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS), the authors introduce the Influence score, or “I-score,” as a statistic correlated with how much variables inherently can predict, or “predictivity”, which can consequently be used to identify highly predictive variables.
“In our last paper, we showed that significant variables may not necessarily be predictive, and that good predictors may not appear statistically significant,” said principal investigator Shaw-Hwa Lo, a professor of statistics at Columbia University. “This left us with an important question: how can we find highly predictive variables then, if not through a guideline of statistical significance? In this article, we provide a theoretical framework from which to design good measures of prediction in general. Importantly, we introduce a variable set’s predictivity as a new parameter of interest to estimate, and provide the I-score as a candidate statistic to estimate variable set predictivity.”
Current approaches to prediction generally include using a significance-based criterion for evaluating variables to use in models and evaluating variables and models simultaneously for prediction using cross-validation or independent test data.
“Using the I-score prediction framework allows us to define a novel measure of predictivity based on observed data, which in turn enables assessing variable sets for, preferably high, predictivity,” Lo said, adding that, while intuitively obvious, not enough attention has been paid to the consideration of predictivity as a parameter of interest to estimate. Motivated by the needs of current genome-wide association studies (GWAS), the study authors provide such a discussion.
In the paper, the authors describe the predictivity for a variable set and show that a simple sample estimation of predictivity directly does not provide usable information for the prediction-oriented researcher. They go on to demonstrate that the I-score can be used to compute a measure that asymptotically approaches predictivity. The I-score can effectively differentiate between noisy and predictive variables, Lo explained, making it helpful in variable selection. A further benefit is that while usual approaches require heavy use of cross-validation data or testing data to evaluate the predictors, the I-score approach does not rely as much on this as much.
“We offer simulations and an application of the I-score on real data to demonstrate the statistic’s predictive performance on sample data,” he said. “These show that the I-score can capture highly predictive variable sets, estimates a lower bound for the theoretical correct prediction rate, and correlates well with the out of sample correct rate. We suggest that using the I-score method can aid in finding variable sets with promising prediction rates, however, further research in the avenue of sample-based measures of predictivity is needed.”
The authors conclude that there are many applications for which using the I-score would be useful, for example in formulating predictions about diseases with high dimensional data, such as gene datasets, in the social sciences for text prediction or financial markets predictions; in terrorism, civil war, elections and financial markets.
“We’re hoping to impress upon the scientific community the notion that for those of us who might be interested in predicting an outcome of interest, possibly with rather complex or high dimensional data, we might gain by reconsidering the question as one of how to search for highly predictive variables (or variable sets) and using statistics that measure predictivity to help us identify those variables to then predict well,” Lo said. “For statisticians in particular, we’re hoping this opens up a new field of work that would focus on designing new statistics that measure predictivity.”
Receive an email update when we add a new PREDICTION TOOL article.
The Latest on: Accurate predictions
via Google News
The Latest on: Accurate predictions
- Uniswap Price Prediction: UNI bears take a breather, not out the woods yeton November 28, 2020 at 5:13 am
Uniswap charted a classic rising wedge breakdown on the 12H chart. On-chain metrics warrant caution for the UNI bulls. 100-SMA cushions the immediate downside. Uniswap (UNI/USD) turns positive for the ...
- Reconciling Blasingame’s 2020 crystal ball predictionson November 27, 2020 at 3:15 pm
Then at the end of each year, I’ve reconciled my predictions against what actually happened and gave myself a score. Through the 20 editions prior to 2020, my accuracy record was 73%. That might not ...
- UFC on ESPN+ 42: Ashlee Evans-Smith vs. Norma Dumont odds, picks and predictionon November 27, 2020 at 1:02 pm
Smith vs. Clark between Ashlee Evans-Smith vs. Norma Dumont, with MMA betting odds, picks, tips and predictions.
- UFC on ESPN+ 42: Bill Algeo vs. Spike Carlyle odds, picks and predictionon November 27, 2020 at 12:48 pm
Smith vs. Clark fight between Bill Algeo vs. Spike Carlyle, with MMA betting odds, picks, tips and predictions.
- The Surprising Accuracy of Memoryon November 27, 2020 at 10:36 am
Our memories are more reliable than experts predicted ...
- ‘Contagion’ Star Jude Law Says Film’s Pandemic Predictions ‘Scared the Hell Out of Me’ – and Were Spot Onon November 27, 2020 at 10:12 am
Jude Law says he wasn’t “hugely surprised” by the way the coronavirus pandemic has crippled the world this year — due to his work on director Steven Soderbergh’s 2011 thriller “Contagion” that ...
- Detroit News predictions: Penn State at Michiganon November 27, 2020 at 10:04 am
Angelique S. Chengelis, Matt Charboneau, John Niyo and Bob Wojnowski of The Detroit News predict the outcome of Saturday’s Penn State at Michigan game.
- Unprecedented accuracy in quantum electrodynamics: Giant leap toward solving proton charge radius puzzleon November 27, 2020 at 9:13 am
Physicists at the Max Planck Institute of Quantum Optics have tested quantum mechanics to a completely new level of precision using hydrogen spectroscopy, and in doing so they came much closer to ...
- Cybersecurity Predictions for 2021: Robot Overlords No, Connected Car Hacks Yeson November 27, 2020 at 5:00 am
While 2021 will present evolving threats and new challenges, it will also offer new tools and technologies that will we hope shift the balance towards the defense.
via Bing News