fMRI Spots More Lies in First Controlled Comparison of the Two Technologies
When it comes to lying, our brains are much more likely to give us away than sweaty palms or spikes in heart rate, new evidence from researchers in the Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania suggests. The study, published in the Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, found that scanning people’s brains with fMRI, or functional magnetic resonance imaging, was significantly more effective at spotting lies than a traditional polygraph test.
It has been demonstrated that when someone is lying, areas of the brain linked to decision-making are activated, which lights up on an fMRI scan for experts to see. While laboratory studies showed fMRI’s ability to detect deception with up to 90 percent accuracy, estimates of polygraphs’ accuracy ranged wildly, between chance and 100 percent, depending on the study. The Penn study was the first to compare the two modalities in the same individuals in a blinded and prospective fashion. The approach adds scientific data to the long-standing debate about this technology and builds the case for more studies investigating its potential real-life applications, such as evidence in the criminal legal proceedings.
Researchers from Penn’s departments of Psychiatry and Biostatistics and Epidemiology found that neuroscience experts without prior experience in lie detection, using fMRI data, were 24 percent more likely to detect deception than professional polygraph examiners reviewing polygraph recordings. In both fMRI and polygraph, participants took a standardized “concealed information” test.
Polygraph, the only physiological lie detector in worldwide use since it was introduced in its present form more than 50 years ago, monitors individuals’ electrical skin conductivity, heart rate, and respiration during a series of questions. Polygraph is based on the assumption that incidents of lying are marked by upward or downward spikes in these measurements. Despite having been deemed inadmissible as legal evidence in most jurisdictions in the United States or for pre-employment screening in the private sector for almost 30 years, polygraph is widely used for government background checks and security clearances.
“Polygraph measures reflect complex activity of the peripheral nervous system that is reduced to only a few parameters, while fMRI is looking at thousands of brain clusters with higher resolution in both space and time. While neither type of activity is unique to lying, we expected brain activity to be a more specific marker, and this is what I believe we found,” said the study’s lead author, Daniel D. Langleben, MD, a professor of Psychiatry.
To compare the two technologies, 28 participants were given the so-called “Concealed Information Test” (CIT). CIT is designed to determine whether a person has specific knowledge by asking carefully constructed questions, some of which have known answers, and looking for responses that are accompanied by spikes in physiological activity. Sometimes referred to as the Guilty Knowledge Test, CIT has been developed and used by polygraph examiners to demonstrate the effectiveness of their methods to subjects prior to the actual polygraph examination.
In the Penn study, a polygraph examiner asked participants to secretly write down a number between three and eight. Next, each person was administered the CIT while either hooked to a polygraph or lying inside an MRI scanner. Each of the participants had both tests, in a different order, a few hours apart. During both sessions, they were instructed to answer “no” to questions about all the numbers, making one of the six answers a lie. The results were then evaluated by three polygraph and three neuroimaging experts separately and then compared to determine which technology was better at detecting the fib.
In one example in the paper, fMRI clearly shows increased brain activity when a participant, who picked the number seven, is asked if that is their number. Experts who studied the polygraph counterpart incorrectly identified the number six as the lie. The polygraph associated with the number six shows high peaks after the participant is asked the same questions several times in a row, suggesting that answer was a lie. The scenario was reversed in another example, as neither fMRI nor polygraph experts were perfect, which is demonstrated in the paper. However, overall, fMRI experts were 24 percent more likely to detect the lie in any given participant.
Beyond the accuracy comparison, authors made another important observation. In the 17 cases when polygraph and fMRI agreed on what the concealed number was, they were 100 percent correct. Such high precision of positive determinations could be especially important in the United States and British criminal proceedings, where avoiding false convictions takes absolute precedence over catching the guilty, the authors said. They cautioned that while this does suggest that the two modalities may be complementary if used in sequence, their study was not designed to test combined use of both modalities and their unexpected observation needs to be confirmed experimentally before any practical conclusions could be made.
The Latest on: Lie detection
via Google News
The Latest on: Lie detection
- Kevin Hart, Jennifer Lawrence, David Dobrik, & More Take a Lie Detector Teston June 26, 2020 at 5:00 pm
Noah Centineo, Lana Condor, Chrissy Teigen, John Legend, Rashida Jones, Amy Poehler, the cast of Queer Eye, Colin Jost, Michael Che, Gaten Matarazzo, Dakota Johnson, Tracy Morgan, Taraji P. Henson and ...
- Super-Earths discovered orbiting nearby red dwarfon June 26, 2020 at 7:16 am
The nearest exoplanets to us provide the best opportunities for study, including searching for evidence of life outside the Solar System. Astronomers have now detected a system of super-Earth planets ...
- Time of their lives or 'Good Riddance?' Big challenges lie ahead for Class of 2020on June 18, 2020 at 3:27 am
The Class of 2020 was born into an America that hadn't existed before and is leaving high school amid unprecendent times in our history.
- Converus Donating Lie Detector Tests to Law Enforcement to Screen for Possible Misconducton June 11, 2020 at 11:52 am
Converus Donating Lie Detector Tests to Law Enforcement to Screen for Possible Misconduct PR Newswire LEHI, Utah, June 11, 2020 Converus offers EyeDetect "test drive" to law enforcement to monitor ...
- Converus Donating Lie Detector Tests to Law Enforcement to Screen for Possible Misconducton June 11, 2020 at 11:44 am
Tech company Converus will help identify cases of misconduct by giving 15 law enforcement agencies free use of EyeDetect to test job ...
- Loudoun Co. double-murder suspect seeks to quash statements, lie detectoron June 10, 2020 at 11:55 am
The Virginia man charged with the 2018 armed murder of a Loudoun County woman and her adult son in their home wants a judge to suppress statements he made while talking to detectives.
- How To Beat Your Futuristic Lie Detectoron June 9, 2020 at 6:30 am
Scientists (and the companies that fund them) claim there's a new, better wave in lie-detection technology ahead. We'll use functional MRIs and electroencephalographies to make sure you're telling ...
- Florida sheriff lied his way into first police job but still passed lie detector teston June 2, 2020 at 11:06 pm
A Florida sheriff in Broward County lied his way into his first police job and then passed a lie-detector test, which should have revealed that he killed a teenager when he was 14 years old.
- Sheriff Gregory Tony concealed his past, and even a lie detector didn’t catch it, records showon May 27, 2020 at 11:04 pm
Broward Sheriff Gregory Tony lied several times to get his first job as a police officer and then passed a lie-detector test despite saying his answers were true, newly released records show.
via Bing News