In July, videos of the fatal police shootings of Alton Sterling—a black man in Louisiana—and Philando Castile—a black man in Minnesota—went viral on social media. The immediate aftermath of the Castile shooting was first shared via Facebook Live, which is a type of mobile streaming video technology (MSVT) that allows users to stream live video to followers, similar to Periscope and Meerkat.
The real-time video of Castile’s death reached over 5 million people within a week of its posting.
In a new study, Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record, Jeremy Littau, assistant professor of journalism at Lehigh University, and Daxton Stewart, associate dean and associate professor in the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at Texas Christian University, examine the legal rights of people to record and live-stream and any potential right to be free from being recorded and streamed in public places.
The authors find that current laws protecting individual rights are insufficient to protect privacy when it comes to these technologies and that the First Amendment likely protects livestreaming activities of users.
“The Castile shooting is important not only for its content, but also because a Facebook user showed the public a new tool that it might not otherwise have known about or thought to use in a situation like this,” Littau says.
“What happened in Minnesota is one of those incidents that serve as a harbinger for what is to come.”
Because of the ease with which users are able to share live video streams, MSVTs have great potential to catalyze new privacy laws and policies, as legislatures, courts, citizens, and tech companies consider the balance between peoples individual’s right to privacy and the public’s right to free expression.
Littau says that mobile streaming technologies will soon completely change how the public views privacy. He predicts some entities will seek to carve out special exemptions for themselves.
“Our work already mentions situations where municipalities have tried to pass laws stopping citizens from recording police activities in public. It’s completely unconstitutional, but that won’t stop people from trying,” he explains. “Exempting public officials and government workers from the laws that apply to everyone is not a new idea in the U.S. At some point a locality is going to try and make it a crime to live stream police actions on the street.”
Services like Facebook Live break down the previous lag between information collection and information distribution, making potential privacy violations instantaneous and unavoidable, according to the research, which was published in print in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly in June.
The researchers advocate that privacy challenges be addressed directly between by mobile streaming companies and their users via contracts. Attempts to strengthen privacy laws will likely be thwarted by First Amendment protections.
“Ultimately consumers of tools like Periscope and Facebook Live will shape the way they are used,” Dr. Stewart says.
“If the developers do not place restraints on use, and do not provide tools for the community of users to monitor content, then it’s likely we will continue to see them put to troubling uses such the teenager who live-streamed her suicide in France, or the young woman who live-streamed a friend being sexually assaulted earlier this year.”
Stewart says the biggest challenge that the courts will face when these cases arise will be trying to fit old ways of thinking about privacy and public spaces into new tools that weren’t even foreseeable when those approaches to privacy were developed. “In this study, we advocate for less legal restraint of recording and live-streaming public matters or government officials in public places, which clearly deserve First Amendment protection,” he says. “But we also call for wisdom by users and tech companies in controlling the spread of materials that may be more harmful to private individuals.”
The Latest on: Privacy law
via Google News
The Latest on: Privacy law
- The laws protecting our data are too weakon December 5, 2019 at 7:10 am
- Advocacy groups press FTC to subpoena tech firms during children's privacy reviewon December 5, 2019 at 6:33 am
The groups, including the Campaign for a Commercial-Free Childhood and American Academy of Pediatrics, say the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) needs to use its subpoena authority as it considers ...
- WireWheel and IDology Partner to Verify and Authenticate Subject Rights Requests for CCPA, GDPR and Evolving Privacy Lawson December 5, 2019 at 4:00 am
The two will work together to offer a critical solution for verifying and authenticating the identities of consumers who submit Subject Rights Requests (SRRs) under the California Consumer Privacy Act ...
- How California is rewriting the law on online privacyon December 5, 2019 at 3:46 am
Responding to outcry that technology companies have invaded consumers’ privacy, California became the first state in the nation to pass a law giving people more control of their digital data. The new ...
- Businesses Confused Over Terms of California’s New Privacy Lawon December 4, 2019 at 6:05 pm
SAN FRANCISCO (CN) – With a monumental privacy law set to take effect in just a few weeks, privacy advocates, corporate lawyers and representatives from trade groups and financial institutions flocked ...
- A federal privacy law is starting to crystallize, but Democrats and Republicans can't agree on how to do iton December 4, 2019 at 5:45 pm
At a Senate Commerce Committee hearing on Wednesday, lawmakers agreed they urgently need a federal privacy law as California's new bill is set to take effect on Jan. 1. Two main proposals are now on ...
- Sen. Blackburn Says U.S. Needs Federal Data Privacy Lawon December 4, 2019 at 5:27 pm
"Bloomberg Markets" is focused on bringing you the most important global business and breaking markets news and information as it happens.
- California's privacy law could jeopardize consumer loyalty programs, says ANAon December 4, 2019 at 2:05 pm
Are you a print subscriber? Activate your account. By Ad Age and Creativity Staff - 30 min 20 sec ago By Drew Neisser - 2 hours 56 min ago By Alexandra Jardine - 2 hours 58 min ago By Alicia Hatch - 3 ...
- Americans are ‘absolutely appalled’ by the lack of a national data-privacy law, says Republican Sen. Blackburnon December 4, 2019 at 12:02 pm
There is, however, a partisan split over the potential for federal preemption of the privacy laws passed in California and other states. Gigi Sohn, a distinguished fellow at Georgetown Law’s Institute ...
- Should Congress be concerned about California's data privacy law?on December 3, 2019 at 1:30 pm
These state laws will have a national effect. Some technology companies, including Microsoft, already plan on honoring the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) nationwide. Indeed, because of its ...
via Bing News