In July, videos of the fatal police shootings of Alton Sterling—a black man in Louisiana—and Philando Castile—a black man in Minnesota—went viral on social media. The immediate aftermath of the Castile shooting was first shared via Facebook Live, which is a type of mobile streaming video technology (MSVT) that allows users to stream live video to followers, similar to Periscope and Meerkat.
The real-time video of Castile’s death reached over 5 million people within a week of its posting.
In a new study, Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record, Jeremy Littau, assistant professor of journalism at Lehigh University, and Daxton Stewart, associate dean and associate professor in the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at Texas Christian University, examine the legal rights of people to record and live-stream and any potential right to be free from being recorded and streamed in public places.
The authors find that current laws protecting individual rights are insufficient to protect privacy when it comes to these technologies and that the First Amendment likely protects livestreaming activities of users.
“The Castile shooting is important not only for its content, but also because a Facebook user showed the public a new tool that it might not otherwise have known about or thought to use in a situation like this,” Littau says.
“What happened in Minnesota is one of those incidents that serve as a harbinger for what is to come.”
Because of the ease with which users are able to share live video streams, MSVTs have great potential to catalyze new privacy laws and policies, as legislatures, courts, citizens, and tech companies consider the balance between peoples individual’s right to privacy and the public’s right to free expression.
Littau says that mobile streaming technologies will soon completely change how the public views privacy. He predicts some entities will seek to carve out special exemptions for themselves.
“Our work already mentions situations where municipalities have tried to pass laws stopping citizens from recording police activities in public. It’s completely unconstitutional, but that won’t stop people from trying,” he explains. “Exempting public officials and government workers from the laws that apply to everyone is not a new idea in the U.S. At some point a locality is going to try and make it a crime to live stream police actions on the street.”
Services like Facebook Live break down the previous lag between information collection and information distribution, making potential privacy violations instantaneous and unavoidable, according to the research, which was published in print in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly in June.
The researchers advocate that privacy challenges be addressed directly between by mobile streaming companies and their users via contracts. Attempts to strengthen privacy laws will likely be thwarted by First Amendment protections.
“Ultimately consumers of tools like Periscope and Facebook Live will shape the way they are used,” Dr. Stewart says.
“If the developers do not place restraints on use, and do not provide tools for the community of users to monitor content, then it’s likely we will continue to see them put to troubling uses such the teenager who live-streamed her suicide in France, or the young woman who live-streamed a friend being sexually assaulted earlier this year.”
Stewart says the biggest challenge that the courts will face when these cases arise will be trying to fit old ways of thinking about privacy and public spaces into new tools that weren’t even foreseeable when those approaches to privacy were developed. “In this study, we advocate for less legal restraint of recording and live-streaming public matters or government officials in public places, which clearly deserve First Amendment protection,” he says. “But we also call for wisdom by users and tech companies in controlling the spread of materials that may be more harmful to private individuals.”
The Latest on: Privacy law
via Google News
The Latest on: Privacy law
- Online viewer privacy is regulated by an act originally designed to protect video rentalson July 21, 2019 at 4:41 am
(MENAFN - The Conversation) In 1988, after United States Supreme Court nominee Robert Bork's videotape rental history was leaked to the press, Congress realised the threat that new technologies ... […]
- Fight to change California’s landmark consumer privacy law fizzles — for nowon July 21, 2019 at 4:14 am
SACRAMENTO — As a consumer, Dirk Lorenz says he understands the anxiety many people feel about online ads that seem to stalk their search and social media visits. He, too, finds the mass collection of ... […]
- Editorial: Facebook and Google show why California’s online privacy law is so importanton July 20, 2019 at 4:33 am
The news that Facebook faces a $5 billion fine from the Federal Trade Commission for massive, chronic privacy violations signals the arrival of a new era in which regulators are far less tolerant of ... […]
- FaceApp Makes Today’s Privacy Laws Look Antiquatedon July 20, 2019 at 3:14 am
Americans give billions of dollars a year to industries that promise to make them look younger. FaceApp became wildly popular, seemingly overnight, for doing the exact opposite. Applying a filter ... […]
- Google will reportedly face a multimillion-dollar fine after an FTC investigation found that YouTube was in violation of children's privacy lawson July 19, 2019 at 5:00 pm
The Federal Trade Commission has reportedly finalized a settlement with Google after an investigation found that YouTube was in violation of children's privacy laws. Specifically, the investigation ... […]
- Still-unresolved battle over privacy between US law enforcement and Silicon Valley is growing: ANALYSISon July 19, 2019 at 4:34 pm
In December 2015, Syed Farook and his wife went on a terrorism killing spree in San Bernardino, California, that only ended after a blazing gun battle with law enforcement. One of the key sources ... […]
- New York State Data Privacy Law Failson July 19, 2019 at 1:17 pm
New York’s proposed data privacy law failed to materialize in the latest legislative session and is now presumed dead. New York was one of a number of states that proposed sweeping privacy legislation ... […]
- Here's What an Update of a Key U.S. Privacy Law Could Mean for Schoolson July 19, 2019 at 12:08 pm
In the era of YouTube, Fortnite, Snapchat, and more grown-up technology beloved by kids, does one of the main federal laws protecting online privacy for kids under 13 need a makeover? That's what ... […]
- Cybersecurity and Data Privacy in the Practice of Lawon July 18, 2019 at 11:09 am
Law firms often operate as a repository of sensitive client information, from proprietary trade secrets to personal data such as social security numbers and medical information. We also store ... […]
- The FTC looks to change children’s privacy law following complaints about YouTubeon July 18, 2019 at 9:45 am
The U.S. Federal Trade Commission is considering an update to the laws governing children’s privacy online, known as the COPPA Rule (or, the Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act). ... […]
via Bing News