In July, videos of the fatal police shootings of Alton Sterling—a black man in Louisiana—and Philando Castile—a black man in Minnesota—went viral on social media. The immediate aftermath of the Castile shooting was first shared via Facebook Live, which is a type of mobile streaming video technology (MSVT) that allows users to stream live video to followers, similar to Periscope and Meerkat.
The real-time video of Castile’s death reached over 5 million people within a week of its posting.
In a new study, Up, Periscope: Mobile Streaming Video Technologies, Privacy in Public, and the Right to Record, Jeremy Littau, assistant professor of journalism at Lehigh University, and Daxton Stewart, associate dean and associate professor in the Bob Schieffer College of Communication at Texas Christian University, examine the legal rights of people to record and live-stream and any potential right to be free from being recorded and streamed in public places.
The authors find that current laws protecting individual rights are insufficient to protect privacy when it comes to these technologies and that the First Amendment likely protects livestreaming activities of users.
“The Castile shooting is important not only for its content, but also because a Facebook user showed the public a new tool that it might not otherwise have known about or thought to use in a situation like this,” Littau says.
“What happened in Minnesota is one of those incidents that serve as a harbinger for what is to come.”
Because of the ease with which users are able to share live video streams, MSVTs have great potential to catalyze new privacy laws and policies, as legislatures, courts, citizens, and tech companies consider the balance between peoples individual’s right to privacy and the public’s right to free expression.
Littau says that mobile streaming technologies will soon completely change how the public views privacy. He predicts some entities will seek to carve out special exemptions for themselves.
“Our work already mentions situations where municipalities have tried to pass laws stopping citizens from recording police activities in public. It’s completely unconstitutional, but that won’t stop people from trying,” he explains. “Exempting public officials and government workers from the laws that apply to everyone is not a new idea in the U.S. At some point a locality is going to try and make it a crime to live stream police actions on the street.”
Services like Facebook Live break down the previous lag between information collection and information distribution, making potential privacy violations instantaneous and unavoidable, according to the research, which was published in print in Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly in June.
The researchers advocate that privacy challenges be addressed directly between by mobile streaming companies and their users via contracts. Attempts to strengthen privacy laws will likely be thwarted by First Amendment protections.
“Ultimately consumers of tools like Periscope and Facebook Live will shape the way they are used,” Dr. Stewart says.
“If the developers do not place restraints on use, and do not provide tools for the community of users to monitor content, then it’s likely we will continue to see them put to troubling uses such the teenager who live-streamed her suicide in France, or the young woman who live-streamed a friend being sexually assaulted earlier this year.”
Stewart says the biggest challenge that the courts will face when these cases arise will be trying to fit old ways of thinking about privacy and public spaces into new tools that weren’t even foreseeable when those approaches to privacy were developed. “In this study, we advocate for less legal restraint of recording and live-streaming public matters or government officials in public places, which clearly deserve First Amendment protection,” he says. “But we also call for wisdom by users and tech companies in controlling the spread of materials that may be more harmful to private individuals.”
The Latest on: Privacy law
via Google News
The Latest on: Privacy law
- Two New State IoT Laws Go Into Effect on Jan. 1on December 1, 2019 at 5:12 am
It may be hard to believe, but the California Consumer Privacy Act is not the only new law that will go into effect on Jan. 1, 2020. Rather, new laws in California and Oregon that regulate Internet of ...
- Maine Voices: Internet privacy law is a good first step, but much more needs to be doneon November 30, 2019 at 1:07 am
This year, Maine passed a bill that will help protect the privacy of Mainers. L.D. 946, An Act to Protect the Privacy of Online Customer Information, was meant to solve Maine’s privacy problems, but ...
- Protecting the future of student data privacy: The time to act is nowon November 29, 2019 at 10:00 am
Yes, there are a variety of privacy laws to protect PII, especially that of children: COPPA; the upcoming California Consumer Privacy Act; state privacy laws, etc. It’s also true that many Ed Tech ...
- New privacy law could bring big changes to companies doing business in Californiaon November 28, 2019 at 7:30 pm
A long-awaited consumer privacy law goes into effect in January, with broad implications for companies doing business across the United States. The California Consumer Privacy Act was passed by the ...
- Brexit ad blitz data firm paid by Vote Leave broke privacy laws, watchdogs findon November 27, 2019 at 3:13 am
A joint investigation by watchdogs in Canada and British Columbia has found that Cambridge Analytica-linked data firm, Aggregate IQ, broke privacy laws in Facebook ad-targeting work it undertook for ...
- Senate takes another stab at privacy law with proposed COPRA billon November 26, 2019 at 1:55 pm
Perhaps the third time's the charm: a group of Senate Democrats, following in the recent footsteps of their colleagues in both chambers, has introduced a bill that would impose sweeping reforms to the ...
- Data firm broke Canadian privacy laws with involvement in Brexit, U.S. campaigns: probeon November 26, 2019 at 11:43 am
OTTAWA (Reuters) - Canadian data firm AggregateIQ broke privacy laws with some of the work it did for a leading pro-Brexit group in Britain and a number of U.S. political campaigns, according to a ...
- Consumer Online Privacy Rights Act: Is it America's GDPR?on November 26, 2019 at 10:15 am
However, it’s possible that it may provide a jumping-off point for further negotiations between the parties as the public grows increasingly disillusioned with big tech companies and their lightly ...
- Democrats propose sweeping new online privacy laws to rein in tech giantson November 26, 2019 at 8:38 am
Top Democrats on Tuesday proposed tough new privacy laws to rein in the US’s tech companies after a series of scandals that have shaken confidence in the companies and exposed the personal data of ...
- Customer Analytics and Data Privacy Laws: On a Collision Course?on November 26, 2019 at 7:02 am
Though the law of action and reaction applies to physical forces, one could argue (physics majors may cringe) that something similar is occurring within marketing departments worldwide: The need to ...
via Bing News