The EPA must act swiftly to evaluate the possible health risks of nanotechnology
A decade ago the great worry about nanotechnology was that it could quite literally destroy the planet. As Sun Microsystems co-founder Bill Joy warned in his essay “Why the Future Doesn’t Need Us,” self-assembling nanobots could potentially spread out of our control (Mis-)programmed to replicate ad infinitum, these subsentient bots would spread across the landscape as a gray goo of devastation, consuming the earth and every unlucky creature who called it home.
Nowadays we can only wish that our planet-dooming scenarios were so far-fetched. Our existential worries revolve around the all too immediate problems of global warming and disease, and nanotechnology—incorporated into improved solar panels, wind turbines or drug delivery mechanisms—could, if anything, emerge as an important tool to fight these threats.
Yet like any new technology, nanomaterials carry with them potential both for good and for harm. The most salient worries concern not a gray goo apocalypse but rather the more prosaic and likely possibility that some of these novel materials may turn out to be hazardous to our health or the environment. Because ordinary materials display unique properties at the nanoscale, the nanometer-size bits of a seemingly benign material might turn out to be noxious. As John D. Young and Jan Martel report in “The Rise and Fall of Nanobacteria,” even naturally occurring nanoparticulates can have an deleterious effect on the human body. If natural nanoparticulates can harm us, we would be wise to carefully consider the possible actions of engineered nanomaterials. The size of nanoparticles also means that they can more readily escape into the environment and infiltrate deep into internal organs such as the lungs and liver. Adding to the concern, each nanomaterial is unique. Although researchers have conducted a number of studies on the health risks of individual materials, this scattershot approach cannot provide a comprehensive picture of the hazards—quantitative data on what materials, in what concentrations, affect the body over what timescales.
In response to this uncertainty, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently announced a grand research strategy to study the health and environmental effects of nanomaterials, a welcome step that many have been advocating for years. We hope that the program will help build a robust database that will give policy makers and the public the facts needed to understand the possible health risks that specific nanomaterials might create. And although it would be unwise to rush careful research efforts, speed is paramount. According to the Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies, more than 1,000 consumer products containing nanomaterials are available in the U.S., a number that is quickly growing.
First published on Dec 28, 2009
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
via Google News
The Latest on: Possible health risks of nanotechnology
- Portable device helps doctors diagnose sepsis fasteron January 24, 2020 at 9:10 am
Their novel approach draws on recent developments in nanotechnology and on light effects at a nano scale to create a highly portable ... the head of BIOS. Scientists already have possible applications ...
- Three Ways Nanotechnology Improves Manufacturingon January 17, 2020 at 12:18 pm
Nanotechnology involves the manipulation of matter on the atomic and molecular ... So far, his team’s research shows that common 3D printer ink, called filament, can emit gases during the printing ...
- Questioning the New Cannabinoidson January 17, 2020 at 10:47 am
Cinzia Citti from the Institute of Nanotechnology ... has psychoactive effects at low doses, but research is required to confirm how strongly THCP acts on the human brain. There is already great ...
- Cardiol Therapeutics’ Exclusive Manufacturing Partner Receives Three-Year Renewal and Amendment of its Cannabis Act License from Health Canadaon January 15, 2020 at 12:29 pm
It is free from the psychotropic effects of THC and is produced using controlled processes in a cGMP, Health Canada approved ... is also developing proprietary nanotechnology to uniquely deliver ...
- Nanotechnology in South America Market Reporton January 14, 2020 at 2:20 am
The workshop, which was set up by Nanotechnology Coordination at the Brazilian Ministry for Science Technology and Innovation, and the Energy and Nuclear Research National Institute (IPEN), looked to ...
- Grant to Support Study of Public Perception of Nanotechnology Health Riskson January 8, 2020 at 4:00 pm
The National Science Foundation granted a North Carolina State University researcher $1.4 million to study how the public interprets information about the potential health risks of nanotechnology.
- The Complex Task of Managing Nanotechnology Riskson January 1, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Fortune recently noted that nanotechnology touches ... industries” to “have the potential to be exposed to uniquely engineered materials with novel sizes, shapes, and physical and chemical properties, ...
- Taming Nanotechnology's Potential Riskson December 20, 2019 at 1:47 pm
But understanding the potential risks and courtroom implications can help manufacturers ... one of the wonder materials of the new age of nanotechnology, may carry a health risk similar to that of ...
- New Blog Looks at Potential Nanotechnology Riskson November 6, 2019 at 4:00 pm
Maynard, Project on Emerging Nanotechnologies chief scientist, will be a regular contributor to the blog and will explore the many facets of ... and consultancy concerning the potential risks to the ...
- Interesting new nanotechnology books in Octoberon October 15, 2019 at 9:32 am
Nanotechnology in the Defense Industry ... including the effects of wastewater treatment on nanomaterials. The book discusses possible risks to human health and the environment and the environment, ...
via Bing News