Software helps users avoid accidentally leaking sensitive info on camera
Camera-equipped smartphones, laptops and other devices make it possible to share ideas and images with anyone, anywhere, often in real-time. But in our cameras-everywhere culture, the risk of accidentally leaking sensitive information is growing.
Computer scientists at Duke University have developed software that helps prevent inadvertent disclosure of trade secrets and other restricted information within a camera’s field of view by letting users specify what others can see.
A video chat with collaborators, customers or suppliers outside of the office, for example, could reveal confidential product plans drawn on a whiteboard in the background, or sales figures or source code on nearby computer screens.
Using a smartphone to scan a receipt for expense purposes could also expose portions of meeting notes, pill bottles, and other personal items on your desk.
“There are more and more cameras every year. They’re incredibly useful,” said Landon Cox, an associate professor of computer science at Duke. “But the downside is we’re now converting large swaths of our surroundings to a digital format that’s easy to access and share, including things we might not want to be digitizing.”
The simplest way to ensure privacy is to disable the camera or microphone when sensitive information is in the frame, Cox said.
But rather than all or nothing, the researchers wanted to give users more granular control over which objects in the camera’s view are shared and which are kept private.
Prior efforts to safeguard confidential information in photos and video use a “blacklist” approach. Developers anticipate things that users might want to hide, and build software that blurs or masks them in each frame.
But coming up with an exhaustive list of potentially troublesome objects is virtually impossible. “Things that some people consider sensitive might not be sensitive to you,” said assistant professor of computer science Ashwin Machanavajjhala, who co-authored the research. “It’s hard to build something that covers all possible scenarios.”
Even for objects that security technology has blacklisted in advance, building software that detects and conceals them quickly and consistently under changing light conditions and motion-induced blur has proven challenging.
“Even if it fails just 1 or 2 percent of the time, it’s not secure,” said co-author Animesh Srivastava, a graduate student at Duke.
So the team tried a different strategy. Instead of relying on a developer’s best guesstimate of which objects should be “public” and which should be “private,” the researchers set things up so that the user makes that determination. And instead of choosing what to hide, the user chooses what to reveal.
“If we get it right, hopefully it will lead to something that’s more secure and easier to use,” Cox said.
The researchers presented two examples of their approach on June 28 at the 14th International Conference on Mobile Systems, Applications, and Services (MobiSys 2016) in Singapore.
One is designed to protect sensitive information on two-dimensional surfaces such as whiteboards and computer presentation slides. The other safeguards images of three-dimensional objects such as keyboards and faces.
In both cases, users select the part of a scene that is OK to share by drawing a rectangular border around it, either by hand or with a few clicks of a mouse.
Once it knows what it’s looking for, the software intercepts all incoming frames from the video stream and rapidly scans frame by frame for a match using computer vision technology.
Only authorized objects are allowed to pass from the camera to third-party software, like smartphone apps. Everything else is blocked out by default.
“The key challenges in designing these systems were to ensure that the marking process was easy for the users, and that detecting public regions did not slow down the camera output or the smartphone,” Machanavajjhala said.
In one user study, the researchers asked 26 people to use Android smartphones to scan QR codes — the square-shaped barcodes that are becoming increasingly popular in ads — with and without the new security features. The participants rated the speed and ease of the cameras on the “secure” smartphones on par with unmodified smartphones.
The team also tested their security software on videos shot when the camera was in motion. They found they could reliably safeguard sensitive regions while still delivering 24 frames per second, fast enough for human eyes to perceive a smooth moving picture rather than a flickering image on a screen.
This isn’t the ultimate solution to image privacy protection, Machanavajjhala said. The software doesn’t protect things caught by cameras outside a person’s control, for example. “If you’re just walking around on the street, and you want to ensure that your face isn’t captured, this won’t work,” he said.
But in the future, the team hopes their research will encourage technology companies
to design and develop products that give users more privacy when it comes to their own devices.
In the meantime, they are looking into ways of giving users similarly fine-grained privacy controls over audio recordings in addition to images, by allowing third parties to hear only certain voices, words or noises in an audio stream, for example.
“People are going to want some way to control the information that things like microphones and motion detectors and other sensors have access to in a much smarter way than just turning them on or off,” Cox said. “These kinds of issues are going to be really important to figure out over the next decade.”
The Latest on: Video Privacy Tool
via Google News
The Latest on: Video Privacy Tool
- Watch out TikTok, Instagram is introducing its own video sharing app Reelson August 5, 2020 at 1:10 pm
Facebook-owned Instagram launched Reels, a product very similar to TikTok, the Chinese video-sharing service owned by ByteDance. According to the press release, Reels allows users to record and edit ...
- Answering Judge Esther Salas’s Call for a ‘National Dialogue’ on Judicial Privacy, Safety After Her Son’s Killingon August 4, 2020 at 4:55 am
U.S. District Judge Esther Salas provided a video statement on the death of her son and the ... Salas is calling for “a national dialogue” about how to protect the privacy of federal judges in the ...
- Ring’s new Video Doorbell 3 drops to second-best price yet at $160 (Save 20%)on August 2, 2020 at 6:17 am
Amazon is currently offering its Prime members the Ring Video Doorbell 3 for $159.99 shipped. Discount will automatically be applied at checkout. Typically fetching $200, today’s offer saves you 20%, ...
- Your Say: Is increased use of video surveillance good or bad?on July 31, 2020 at 11:50 am
Police body cams. Drones over protests. Streetlight cameras. Is increasing surveillance — government or otherwise — good, bad or inevitable?
- Google launches new ad privacy features, toolson July 31, 2020 at 4:56 am
The feature will show users the verified name of the advertiser behind each ad and will be initially available for display ads purchased through Google Ads ...
- Caregility Introduces Integration with Cloudbreak Health for Telehealth Remote Video Interpretationon July 30, 2020 at 4:17 am
- Social media sites scrub viral video shared by Trump making false coronavirus claimson July 28, 2020 at 6:22 am
The claims in the video run contrary to multiple studies and advice from public health officials, including members of President Trump’s own administration.
- Popular TikTok stars to leave platform for rival app over data privacy concernson July 28, 2020 at 6:22 am
Richards has decided to leave the platform that made him a star, citing growing concerns about TikTok’s Chinese parent company ByteDance and how it manages user data. The Los Angeles influencer, along ...
- DHS Wants COVID-19 Response Tech that Protects Health and Privacyon July 24, 2020 at 9:54 am
The Science and Technology Directorate issued a call using its other transaction authority asking for innovative solutions to protect its employees and the public.
- Facebook Proposes $650 Million to Settle Biometric Privacy Caseon July 23, 2020 at 1:55 pm
Facebook Inc. proposed increasing its settlement offer to $650 million to resolve a lawsuit in which users claim the company illegally gathered biometric data through a photo-tagging tool.
via Bing News