New study finds users focus on concrete details rather than the big picture
Tablet and laptop users beware. Using digital platforms such as tablets and laptops for reading may make you more inclined to focus on concrete details rather than interpreting information more abstractly, according to a new study published in the proceedings of ACM CHI ’16, the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, to be held May 7-12, 2016. The findings serve as another wake-up call to how digital media may be affecting our likelihood of using abstract thought.
The research tested the basic question: would processing the same information on a digital versus non-digital platform affect “construal levels”– the fundamental level of concreteness versus abstractness that people use in perceiving and interpreting behaviors, events and other informational stimuli. In order to study the basic question of whether processing the same information on one platform or the other would trigger a different baseline “interpretive lens” or mindset that would influence construals of information, the research tried to hold as many factors as possible constant between the digital and non-digital platforms. Reading material and other content for the study for example, was published using the same print size and format in both the digital and non-digital (print) versions. The research was comprised of four studies that evaluated how information processing is affected by each platform. A total of more than 300 participants, ages 20 to 24 years old, took part in the studies, which were comprised of 60 to 100+ participants.
Reading comprehension and problem solving success were affected by the type of platform used. Highlights from the studies include the following:
- Participants were asked to read a short story by author David Sedaris on either a physical printout (non-digital) or in a PDF on a PC laptop (digital), and were then asked to take a pop-quiz, paper-and-pencil comprehension test. For the abstract questions, on average, participants using the non-digital platform scored higher on inference questions with 66 percent correct, as compared to those using the digital platform, who had 48 percent correct. On the concrete questions, participants using the digital platform scored better with 73 percent correct, as compared to those using the non-digital platform, who had 58 percent correct. (See Study 2; mean scores were translated into percentages by lead author).
- Participants were asked to read a table of information about four, fictitious Japanese car models on either a PC laptop screen or paper print-out, and were then asked to select which car model is superior. Sixty-six percent of the participants using the non-digital platform (printed materials) reported the correct answer, as compared to 43 percent of those using the digital platform. (See Study 3A).
- Triggering a more abstract mindset prior to an information processing task on a digital platform appeared to help facilitate a better performance on tasks that require abstract thinking. Specifically, 48 percent of participants reported the correct answer to the Japanese car judgement task after completing a priming activity intended to activate a high-level of construal in which they were tasked to take on an abstract mindset, as compared to the 30 percent, who answered correctly without the priming activity. (See Study 3B).
The research was conducted by Dartmouth’s Tiltfactor lab, an interdisciplinary innovation studio that designs and studies games for social impact, and was led by Geoff Kaufman, an assistant professor at the Human-Computer Interaction Institute at Carnegie Mellon University, who was a postdoctoral researcher in psychology at Tiltfactor at the time of the study; and Mary Flanagan, Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Professor in Digital Humanities at Dartmouth and founding director of Tiltfactor.
“There has been a great deal of research on how digital platforms might be affecting attention, distractibility and mindfulness, and these studies build on this work, by focusing on a relatively understudied construct,” said Geoff Kaufman. “Given that psychologists have shown that construal levels can vastly impact outcomes such as self-esteem and goal pursuit, it’s crucial to recognize the role that digitization of information might be having on this important aspect of cognition,” he added.
The study on digital versus non-digital platforms was prompted by earlier research by the co-authors, which revealed that players of the digital version of the public health strategy game,“POX: Save the People®”, were more inclined to respond with localized solutions, rather than looking at the big picture.
“Compared to the widespread acceptance of digital devices, as evidenced by millions of apps, ubiquitous smartphones, and the distribution of iPads in schools, surprisingly few studies exist about how digital tools affect our understanding — our cognition. Knowing the affordances of digital technologies can help us design better software,” said Mary Flanagan. “Sometimes, it is beneficial to foster abstract thinking, and as we know more, we can design to overcome the tendencies — or deficits — inherent in digital devices,” added Flanagan.
Learn more: Digital media may be changing how you think
The Latest on: Concreteness versus abstractness
via Google News
The Latest on: Concreteness versus abstractness
- Making Distinctions in an Age of Abstractionson March 10, 2020 at 5:00 pm
Bloom argues that “concreteness, not abstractness, is the hallmark of philosophy. All interesting generalizations must proceed from the richest awareness of what is to be explained, but the ...
- For and Against Godardon March 9, 2020 at 7:14 pm
Seven years ago, I published a long piece on Breathless which may well have been (and, apart from brief reviews, was almost certainly) the first serious criticism in praise of Godard in English, and ...
- The ‘Uneven U’on February 21, 2020 at 1:48 pm
My labeling may not coincide perfectly, but the point is to recognize the relation between concreteness and abstractness that Newport builds across his sentences. As Newport begins the paragraph ...
- Overlapping connectivity patterns during semantic processing of abstract and concrete words revealed with multivariate Granger Causality analysison February 18, 2020 at 2:27 am
Even though there is no consensus among linguists as to what exactly constitutes a concrete or abstract word, neuroscientists found clear evidence of a “concreteness” effect. This can ...
- How Does the Brain Process Combination Concepts?on April 23, 2018 at 4:24 pm
ERP studies have shown that combined processing can be impacted by the order of the words presented, their concreteness and abstractness, but have not specifically examined the processing of novel ...
- The Society of the Spectacle - Chapter 1: The Culmination of Separationon January 22, 2017 at 11:06 pm
With ever-increasing concreteness the spectacle recreates ... cycle that governs thought and interaction. 2. The Society of the Spectacle - Chapter 2: The Commodity as Spectacle 3.
- Taking It to the Bridge: Music as Performanceon July 24, 2016 at 6:09 am
To talk about music we have to use the full armament of verbiage . . . and much more, replete with universals and particulars, concepts and percepts, abstractness and concreteness, feeling and ...
via Bing News