While the Justice Department wages a public fight with Apple over access to a locked iPhone, government officials are privately debating how to resolve a prolonged standoff with another technology company, WhatsApp, over access to its popular instant messaging application, officials and others involved in the case said.
No decision has been made, but a court fight with WhatsApp, the world’s largest mobile messaging service, would open a new front in the Obama administration’s dispute with Silicon Valley over encryption, security and privacy.
WhatsApp, which is owned by Facebook, allows customers to send messages and make phone calls over the Internet. In the last year, the company has been adding encryption to those conversations, making it impossible for the Justice Department to read or eavesdrop, even with a judge’s wiretap order.
As recently as this past week, officials said, the Justice Department was discussing how to proceed in a continuing criminal investigation in which a federal judge had approved a wiretap, but investigators were stymied by WhatsApp’s encryption.
The Justice Department and WhatsApp declined to comment. The government officials and others who discussed the dispute did so on condition of anonymity because the wiretap order and all the information associated with it were under seal. The nature of the case was not clear, except that officials said it was not a terrorism investigation. The location of the investigation was also unclear.
To understand the battle lines, consider this imperfect analogy from the predigital world: If the Apple dispute is akin to whether the F.B.I. can unlock your front door and search your house, the issue with WhatsApp is whether it can listen to your phone calls. In the era of encryption, neither question has a clear answer.
Some investigators view the WhatsApp issue as even more significant than the one over locked phones because it goes to the heart of the future of wiretapping. They say the Justice Department should ask a judge to force WhatsApp to help the government get information that has been encrypted. Others are reluctant to escalate the dispute, particularly with senators saying they will soon introduce legislation to help the government get data in a format it can read.
Whether the WhatsApp dispute ends in a court fight that sets precedents, many law enforcement officials and security experts say that such a case may be inevitable because the nation’s wiretapping laws were last updated a generation ago, when people communicated by landline telephones that were easy to tap.
“The F.B.I. and the Justice Department are just choosing the exact circumstance to pick the fight that looks the best for them,” said Peter Eckersley, the chief computer scientist at the Electronic Frontier Foundation, a nonprofit group that focuses on digital rights. “They’re waiting for the case that makes the demand look reasonable.”
A senior law enforcement official disputed the notion that the government was angling for the perfect case, and said that litigation was not inevitable.
This is not the first time that the government’s wiretaps have been thwarted by encryption. And WhatsApp is not the only company to clash with the government over the issue. But with a billion users and a particularly strong international customer base, it is by far the largest.
Learn more: WhatsApp Encryption Said to Stymie Wiretap Order
The Latest on: Encryption privacy
via Google News
The Latest on: Encryption privacy
- Apple Watch rewards, iCloud encryption, and WhatsApp hacks on the AppleInsider Podcaston January 24, 2020 at 4:49 am
Victor and William discuss the new Apple Watch rewards program in selected gyms, what's really going on with WhatsApp and iCloud encryption, and how iPhone demand in India has grown ... Victor ...
- iPhone War: The Justice Department Is Taking On Apple Over Encryption (Again)on January 24, 2020 at 3:20 am
Barr alluded to such an effort in his anti-encryption speech in July 2019 and again in his remarks last week. While the ongoing techlash makes punitive legislation more likely, increased skepticism of ...
- In Latest Encryption Battle with Apple, DOJ Still Wrongon January 23, 2020 at 2:32 pm
Encryption providers have the law on their side. The Fourth Amendment generally requires a search warrant before police can seize and read our private correspondence. A warrant gives police permission ...
- Pornhub launches Tor mirror site with encryption to ensure porn-viewing privacyon January 23, 2020 at 9:00 am
Encryption applied at each point along this route makes it very hard to connect a person to any particular browsing activity. The launch of Pornhub’s Tor browser follows other efforts by the company ...
- Report: FBI Got Apple to Roll Over on iCloud Encryptionon January 23, 2020 at 8:15 am
Because Apple refused to break into iPhones despite intense pressure from the U.S. Justice Department in several high-profile cases, the news of the company's apparent capitulation on the backup ...
- Amazon Engineer Leaked Private Encryption Keys. Outside Analysts Discovered Them in Minuteson January 22, 2020 at 10:07 pm
Despite the privacy concerns, labor strikes, and reports that Amazon is selling literal trash on… An analyst began working to verify what specifically had triggered the alert. Around two hours later, ...
- Apple Scrapped Backup Encryption Plans to Cooperate With FBIon January 22, 2020 at 10:14 am
The debate has raged on for a while now, with Apple publicly insisting on more than one occasion that it would not provide “back doors” or other runarounds for its thorough iPhone encryption ...
- Should tech giants slam the encryption door on the government?on January 22, 2020 at 9:42 am
Apple is a great example of a company that doesn’t just sell products or services, but one that tries to sell you trust — trust in a device’s ability to keep your data private. Without that trust, ...
- What the alleged Saudi hack of Jeff Bezos says about the encryption debateon January 22, 2020 at 5:30 am
While President Trump and others continue to target tech firms over their encryption systems, the truth is those systems can be bypassed.
- Can Apple live up to Apple’s privacy ads?on January 22, 2020 at 4:00 am
Gotta love the complete absence of reason in our discourse these days. I don’t know if there is a complete absence of reason, but the truth is that data privacy and encryption is Really Actually Quite ...
via Bing News