Gaps in our information about biodiversity means we are at risk of focussing our conservation efforts in the wrong places.
New research from Newcastle University, UK, University College London (UCL) and the University of Queensland, Australia, highlights the uncertainty around our global biodiversity data because of the way we record species sightings.
The study explains how a lack of information about a species in a particular location doesn’t necessarily mean it’s not there and that recording when we don’t see something is as important as recording when we do.
Publishing their findings today in the academic journal Biology Letters, the team say we need to change the way we record sightings – or a lack of them – so we can better prioritise our conservation efforts in light of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Dr Phil McGowan, one of the study’s authors and a Senior Lecturer in Biodiversity and Conservation at Newcastle University, said:
“Where there is no recent biodiversity data from an area then we might assume a species is no longer found there, but there could be a number of other possible reasons for this lack of data.
“It could be that its habitat is inaccessible – either geographically or due to human activity such as ongoing conflict – or perhaps it’s simply a case that no-one has been looking for it.
“Unless we know where people have looked for a particular species and not found it then we can’t be confident that it’s not there.”
To test the research, the team used the rigorously compiled database of European and Asian Galliformes – a group of birds which includes the pheasant, grouse and quail.
“Our long-standing love of the Galliformes goes back hundreds of years which means we have records that are likely to be much better than for other groups of animals or plants,” explains Dr McGowan.
“Not only have these birds been hunted for food, but their spectacular colours made them valuable as trophies and to stock the private aviaries of the wealthy. In the late 1800s and the turn of the last century, the Galliformes were prized specimens in museum and private collections and today they are still a favourite with bird watchers.”
Analysing 153,150 records dating from 1727 to 2008 and covering an area from the UK to Siberia and down to Indonesia, the team found that after 1980, there was no available data at 40% of the locations where Galliformes had previously been present.
The study suggests two possible scenarios.
Dr Elizabeth Boakes, the study’s lead author and a teaching fellow at University College London, said:
“We have no evidence of populations existing past 1980 in 40% of our locations. However, absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
“One scenario is that populations have been lost from these areas, probably due to hunting or habitat loss. The other scenario is that the species are still locally present but that nobody has been to look for them.
“Our study shows that which scenario you choose to believe makes a huge difference to measures used in conservation priority-setting such as species richness and geographic range. It’s important that we make the right call and that means a big shake up in the way we currently monitor biodiversity.
“We need to record what we don’t see as well as what we do see and we need to be recording across much wider areas.”
The Latest on: Biodiversity and Conservation
via Google News
The Latest on: Biodiversity and Conservation
- Big game hunter loses conservation job, will still get paidon July 10, 2020 at 4:38 am
The big game hunter appointed to a top conservation role in Western Australia has lost his new role – but he'll keep getting paid.
- European hamster and caterpillar fungus on brink of extinctionon July 9, 2020 at 6:50 am
Hamsters and fungi may not be poster species among those threatened with extinction but are no less important in ecosystems, according to an updated list of the world’s most fragile species. The ...
- Kiwanis Club of Granville awards five college scholarshipson June 20, 2020 at 6:13 am
Her college interests are biodiversity and conservation to improve the environment by working with amphibians in the Amazon of Brazil. She will be attending Brigham Young University, Provo Campus.
- Native plants of the Western Ghats to be documentedon June 18, 2020 at 3:45 pm
Dr. R Ganesan Fellow, Suri Sehgal Centre for Biodiversity and Conservation, Asoka Trust for Research in Ecology, Bangalore is Co Chair of the group. Dr. Aparna Watve- MIT World Peace University ...
- Birds change their tunes after wildfireson June 16, 2020 at 2:48 am
Their song thus offers a way to help understand biodiversity and conservation in ecosystems, a prime objective of Brett Furnas from the California Department of Fish and Wildlife in the US.
- UK PM appoints Indian-origin academic as Natural History Museum Trusteeon May 28, 2020 at 3:36 am
The 52-year-old expert will take on the unpaid advisory role for a period of four years until May 2024.(Yadvinder Malhi /Twitter) British Prime Minister Boris Johnson has appointed Indian-origin ...
- Biodiversity and Conservationon May 26, 2020 at 5:00 pm
Tomas Hrbek –– Excellent contribution to our knowledge of aquatic biodiversity of Colombia. Also a clear example of the importance of considering evolutionary lineages in conservation and management ...
- COVID-19 recovery can benefit biodiversityon May 21, 2020 at 10:50 am
The COVID-19 pandemic has the potential to trigger enormous effects on biodiversity and conservation outcomes. This virus emerged due to wildlife exploitation (5), and the risk of new diseases ...
- Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservationon May 18, 2020 at 5:00 pm
The Center for Marine Biodiversity and Conservation at Scripps Institution of Oceanography promotes interdisciplinary research and educational approaches to maintain the integrity of ocean ecosystems ...
via Bing News