Old-fashioned ways of reporting new discoveries are holding back medical research. Some scientists are pushing for change
“NEVER tried sharing data like this before,” said the tweet. “Feels like walking into a country for the first time. Exciting, but don’t know what to expect.”
David O’Connor of the University of Wisconsin-Madison was announcing his decision on February 14th to post online data from his laboratory’s latest experiment. He and his team had infected macaques with the Zika virus and were recording the concentrations of virus in the monkeys’ bodily fluids every day. Researchers know that Zika is transmitted principally by infected mosquitoes. But if the virus appears in saliva and urine then these might also be sources of infection.
Dr O’Connor and his colleagues published their results every day to a publicly accessible website. They hoped this would be useful to others working on the disease and, ultimately, to health authorities striving to contain it. They did not expect to garner much attention. But they did.
Within days, researchers from all over the world started contacting them, making suggestions and asking for samples to conduct work that Dr O’Connor’s lab was ill-equipped to carry out. He describes the experience of data-sharing as “universally positive”. But as his tweet suggests, such openness is far from routine.
Careers in medical research hang on publishing papers in prestigious journals such as Nature, Science and Cell. Even in emergencies such as the recent Zika outbreak, or the earlier epidemic of Ebola fever in west Africa, biologists are reluctant to share data until their work is published.
Once a paper is submitted to a journal, though, its findings can languish unseen for months as it goes through a vetting process known as peer review. Reviewers can ask for substantial changes, further experiments and also suggest the journal reject the paper outright. If several journals turn down a paper before it is published, it may be years before the results become public.
Left in the dark in this way, other practitioners may waste time and money conducting unnecessary experiments. In cases where the unpublished work might warn of things like unsafe treatments, the cost of the delay could be measured in lives. Dr O’Connor’s response is part of a reaction against this delay.
He is not alone. On February 10th, prompted by concerns that vital data on the Zika epidemic could be held up by journal peer review, scientific academies, research funders and a number of academic publishers urged researchers “to make any information available that might have value in combating the crisis”. The publishers promised that posting a paper online as a so-called preprint would not disqualify it from publication in a journal later.
But not all publishers signed up to the agreement, and it raises many questions. As Stephen Curry of Imperial College London noted in a blog post for the Guardian, a British daily newspaper, if the approach is valid for Zika, then why not for other infectious diseases, including malaria or HIV/AIDS, which kill millions every year?
Learn more: Research publishing: Taking the online medicine
The Latest on: Open science
via Google News
The Latest on: Open science
- UNESCO mobilizes 122 countries to promote open science and reinforced cooperation in the face of COVID-19on April 1, 2020 at 3:53 am
The objective of the meeting was to exchange views on the role of international cooperation in science and increased investment in the context of COVID-19. The key issue of open science ...
- Open Science Promotes Global Scientific Collaboration to Tackle Coronavirus: Why Hasn’t Indonesia Contributed?on April 1, 2020 at 2:34 am
He says it’s due to different research priorities for the country’s science community ... Thanks to the Open Society Foundation who funded the 'Conversation Indonesia' pilot and to the ...
- Introducing the Open Science Manifestoon March 23, 2020 at 10:22 am
In a previous blog, I mentioned the Open and Collaborative Science in Development Network. The network was a joint effort between 13 different projects in 26 Global South countries focusing on all ...
- Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical Researchon March 22, 2020 at 5:00 pm
NIH held a joint workshop in June 2014 with the Nature Publishing Group and Science on the issue of reproducibility ... animals Endorsements — Principles and Guidelines for Reporting Preclinical ...
- Orion: An open-source tool for the science of scienceon March 17, 2020 at 1:53 am
As a Mozilla Open Science Fellow, I am trying to change that. The first jab at it is called Orion. Orion also has a semantic search engine that enables researchers to retrieve relevant cuts of the ...
- Global Officials Call for Free Access to Covid-19 Researchon March 13, 2020 at 2:24 pm
In an open letter, the advisers, including White House Office of Science and Technology Policy director Kelvin Droegemeier, asked the publishers to make data available through PubMed Central ...
- Data Sharing and Open Source Software Help Combat Covid-19on March 13, 2020 at 4:01 am
The way researchers connected those dots highlights the role of open science projects in tracking the evolution of Covid-19 and other diseases. Sharing data and working collaboratively across the ...
- Completely open science has many potential consequenceson March 11, 2020 at 2:07 pm
Regarding the March 8 editorial “Stopping covid-19”: The American Psychological Association (APA) agrees that the move toward more open science is laudable in light of the fast-moving coronavirus.
- Systematization of clinical knowledge for developmental disability support based on open science type researchon March 10, 2020 at 9:42 am
(1) The development of the evidence construction platform based on the open science type research method led by citizens is completed, and it will be used in various regions and areas.(2) Summarize ...
- Publisher Correction: Open Science principles for accelerating trait-based science across the Tree of Lifeon March 9, 2020 at 11:34 am
Correction to: Nature Ecology & Evolution https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1109-6, published online 17 February 2020.
via Bing News