From Apple’s Siri to Honda’s robot Asimo, machines seem to be getting better and better at communicating with humans.
But some neuroscientists caution that today’s computers will never truly understand what we’re saying because they do not take into account the context of a conversation the way people do.
Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don’t develop a shared understanding of the people, place and situation – often including a long social history – that is key to human communication. Without such common ground, a computer cannot help but be confused.
“People tend to think of communication as an exchange of linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of communication is about the social context, about who you are communicating with,” Stolk said.
The word “bank,” for example, would be interpreted one way if you’re holding a credit card but a different way if you’re holding a fishing pole. Without context, making a “V” with two fingers could mean victory, the number two, or “these are the two fingers I broke.”
“All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one another,” Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to communication. “In fact, we can understand one another without language, without words and signs that already have a shared meaning.”
Babies and parents, not to mention strangers lacking a common language, communicate effectively all the time, based solely on gestures and a shared context they build up over even a short time.
Stolk argues that scientists and engineers should focus more on the contextual aspects of mutual understanding, basing his argument on experimental evidence from brain scans that humans achieve nonverbal mutual understanding using unique computational and neural mechanisms. Some of the studies Stolk has conducted suggest that a breakdown in mutual understanding is behind social disorders such as autism.
“This shift in understanding how people communicate without any need for language provides a new theoretical and empirical foundation for understanding normal social communication, and provides a new window into understanding and treating disorders of social communication in neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders,” said Dr. Robert Knight, a UC Berkeley professor of psychology in the campus’s Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and a professor of neurology and neurosurgery at UCSF.
Stolk and his colleagues discuss the importance of conceptual alignment for mutual understanding in an opinion piece appearing Jan. 11 in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Brain scans pinpoint site for ‘meeting of minds’
To explore how brains achieve mutual understanding, Stolk created a game that requires two players to communicate the rules to each other solely by game movements, without talking or even seeing one another, eliminating the influence of language or gesture. He then placed both players in an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imager) and scanned their brains as they nonverbally communicated with one another via computer.
He found that the same regions of the brain – located in the poorly understood right temporal lobe, just above the ear – became active in both players during attempts to communicate the rules of the game. Critically, the superior temporal gyrus of the right temporal lobe maintained a steady, baseline activity throughout the game but became more active when one player suddenly understood what the other player was trying to communicate. The brain’s right hemisphere is more involved in abstract thought and social interactions than the left hemisphere.
“These regions in the right temporal lobe increase in activity the moment you establish a shared meaning for something, but not when you communicate a signal,” Stolk said. “The better the players got at understanding each other, the more active this region became.”
This means that both players are building a similar conceptual framework in the same area of the brain, constantly testing one another to make sure their concepts align, and updating only when new information changes that mutual understanding. The results were reported in 2014 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It is surprising,” said Stolk, “that for both the communicator, who has static input while she is planning her move, and the addressee, who is observing dynamic visual input during the game, the same region of the brain becomes more active over the course of the experiment as they improve their mutual understanding.”
Robots’ statistical reasoning
Robots and computers, on the other hand, converse based on a statistical analysis of a word’s meaning, Stolk said. If you usually use the word “bank” to mean a place to cash a check, then that will be the assumed meaning in a conversation, even when the conversation is about fishing.
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
via Google News
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
- Computer scientist James Allen named AAAS fellowon November 24, 2020 at 7:35 am
University of Rochester professor James Allen is recognized for contributions that enable humans to interact more effectively with computers.
- Olisakwe… Homeboy on a mission to create human-sized AI machineon November 20, 2020 at 7:08 pm
Kassy Timilehin Olisakwe is a 20-year-old Network security engineer (CCNA, CCNP, Comptia S+) with certification in multiple areas in IT, including Machine Learning, Deep Learning and Python ...
- COVID-19 misinformation: understanding and seeking truth during a pandemicon November 20, 2020 at 11:03 am
Add to Calendar This event will be broadcast live on this page. You can also watch this event live on the UC Berkeley Facebook page.
- Is AI finally closing in on human intelligence?on November 17, 2020 at 1:59 pm
Computer scientists have become far better at instructing machines to play the imitation game. Some say it is a glimpse of the future; others, a dangerous bomb.
- NASA Advances Human Mission to Moon with HPE-Powered Supercomputeron November 17, 2020 at 9:00 am
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) today announced that NASA highlighted new research progress to support the next human ...
- NASA Unveils New Research Progress for Human Mission to the Moon With Supercomputer Powered by Hewlett Packard Enterpriseon November 17, 2020 at 4:47 am
Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) today announced that NASA highlighted new research progress to support the next human landing on the moon by performing complex simulations on NASA’s Aitken ...
- Molecular Atlases Reveal How Human Cells Develop and Growon November 15, 2020 at 4:00 pm
UW Medicine researchers at the Brotman Baty Institute in Seattle have created two cell atlases that track gene expression and chromatin accessibility during the development of human cell types and ...
- Human Factor Pivotal to Pandemic and Cyber Modeling, Says CyberCube Reporton November 9, 2020 at 8:14 am
Understanding and predicting human behaviour is the biggest challenge facing modelers of pandemics and cyber risk, a new report from CyberCube says.
- Tech News: Artificial Intelligence and the human brainon November 6, 2020 at 5:03 am
but the results were often catastrophic since the muscles of the human arms are not at all like the muscles of a bird. Due to their lack of the understanding of physics, mimicking the flight ...
- Bar-Ilan doctoral student receives Google PhD Fellowshipon October 30, 2020 at 5:17 pm
A PhD student at the Department of Computer Science at Bar-Ilan University ... Elazar's studies currently focus on common sense understanding in human language and looks at how that understanding ...
via Bing News