From Apple’s Siri to Honda’s robot Asimo, machines seem to be getting better and better at communicating with humans.
But some neuroscientists caution that today’s computers will never truly understand what we’re saying because they do not take into account the context of a conversation the way people do.
Specifically, say University of California, Berkeley, postdoctoral fellow Arjen Stolk and his Dutch colleagues, machines don’t develop a shared understanding of the people, place and situation – often including a long social history – that is key to human communication. Without such common ground, a computer cannot help but be confused.
“People tend to think of communication as an exchange of linguistic signs or gestures, forgetting that much of communication is about the social context, about who you are communicating with,” Stolk said.
The word “bank,” for example, would be interpreted one way if you’re holding a credit card but a different way if you’re holding a fishing pole. Without context, making a “V” with two fingers could mean victory, the number two, or “these are the two fingers I broke.”
“All these subtleties are quite crucial to understanding one another,” Stolk said, perhaps more so than the words and signals that computers and many neuroscientists focus on as the key to communication. “In fact, we can understand one another without language, without words and signs that already have a shared meaning.”
Babies and parents, not to mention strangers lacking a common language, communicate effectively all the time, based solely on gestures and a shared context they build up over even a short time.
Stolk argues that scientists and engineers should focus more on the contextual aspects of mutual understanding, basing his argument on experimental evidence from brain scans that humans achieve nonverbal mutual understanding using unique computational and neural mechanisms. Some of the studies Stolk has conducted suggest that a breakdown in mutual understanding is behind social disorders such as autism.
“This shift in understanding how people communicate without any need for language provides a new theoretical and empirical foundation for understanding normal social communication, and provides a new window into understanding and treating disorders of social communication in neurological and neurodevelopmental disorders,” said Dr. Robert Knight, a UC Berkeley professor of psychology in the campus’s Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and a professor of neurology and neurosurgery at UCSF.
Stolk and his colleagues discuss the importance of conceptual alignment for mutual understanding in an opinion piece appearing Jan. 11 in the journal Trends in Cognitive Sciences.
Brain scans pinpoint site for ‘meeting of minds’
To explore how brains achieve mutual understanding, Stolk created a game that requires two players to communicate the rules to each other solely by game movements, without talking or even seeing one another, eliminating the influence of language or gesture. He then placed both players in an fMRI (functional magnetic resonance imager) and scanned their brains as they nonverbally communicated with one another via computer.
He found that the same regions of the brain – located in the poorly understood right temporal lobe, just above the ear – became active in both players during attempts to communicate the rules of the game. Critically, the superior temporal gyrus of the right temporal lobe maintained a steady, baseline activity throughout the game but became more active when one player suddenly understood what the other player was trying to communicate. The brain’s right hemisphere is more involved in abstract thought and social interactions than the left hemisphere.
“These regions in the right temporal lobe increase in activity the moment you establish a shared meaning for something, but not when you communicate a signal,” Stolk said. “The better the players got at understanding each other, the more active this region became.”
This means that both players are building a similar conceptual framework in the same area of the brain, constantly testing one another to make sure their concepts align, and updating only when new information changes that mutual understanding. The results were reported in 2014 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
“It is surprising,” said Stolk, “that for both the communicator, who has static input while she is planning her move, and the addressee, who is observing dynamic visual input during the game, the same region of the brain becomes more active over the course of the experiment as they improve their mutual understanding.”
Robots’ statistical reasoning
Robots and computers, on the other hand, converse based on a statistical analysis of a word’s meaning, Stolk said. If you usually use the word “bank” to mean a place to cash a check, then that will be the assumed meaning in a conversation, even when the conversation is about fishing.
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
via Google News
The Latest on: Human computer understanding
- Q&A: Understanding the role of ethics in AIon August 16, 2019 at 4:00 am
Q: What will human/machine partnerships look like in the future workplace ... A: I think that in theory, AI is already a tool just like any other that anyone with access to a computer and an internet ...
- 12 things every computer security pro should knowon August 14, 2019 at 3:05 am
Of course it can – and will. Here are twelve things every computer security professional should know to successfully fight the good fight. You can’t begin to successfully fight bad guys without ...
- Hebert Named Dean of Carnegie Mellon’s Top-Ranked School of Computer Scienceon August 8, 2019 at 12:37 pm
with contributions in the areas of perception for environment understanding and human interaction. His research interests center on computer vision. He has led research on fundamental components, such ...
- Understanding Evolution Makes You Smarteron August 6, 2019 at 11:20 am
Not just students interested in understanding DNA ... Physical health (see Cordain et al., 2005) Human social behavior (see Buss, 2017) Art (see Miller, 2000) Marketing and business (see Saad, 2007) ...
- Seeing how computers 'think' helps humans stump machines and reveals AI weaknesseson August 6, 2019 at 8:12 am
However, anyone who has tried to have a conversation with virtual assistant Siri knows that computers have a long way to go to truly understand human language. To get better at understanding language, ...
- Can Virtual Simulations Teach a Human Skill Like Empathy?on August 5, 2019 at 12:00 pm
Can you learn empathy through interacting with a computer—even though, by definition, the skill requires understanding and sympathizing ... “This virtual human—let’s say a student—is programmed with ...
- Computer Science Could Learn A Lot From Library And Information Scienceon August 5, 2019 at 8:14 am
A deeper understanding of information behavior ... Science schools pivot into iSchools and hire waves of computer scientists, the scholarly traditions of the community-centric human focus of LIS are ...
- The New Age of Propaganda: Understanding Influence Operations in the Digital Ageon May 1, 2019 at 1:03 am
He is currently lead researcher in a three-year defense/academic collaborative project exploring the impact of digital transformation from infrastructure to the human/computer interface on Australia’s ...
- Search Engines: A Human Perspectiveon March 11, 2019 at 6:01 am
But all of these measures signal conflate three things: searchers’ effectiveness at expressing their intent, the search engine’s effectiveness at understanding their ... The foundation of ...
- Cross-Cultural Differences in Understanding Human-Computer Interfaceson May 1, 2018 at 10:54 pm
This PhD research performed at the Open University investigates cross-cultural understanding of human-computer interface design. The main research will involve observation sessions with users from ...
via Bing News