SEAS research team removes toxins from flow battery, making it safer, cost-effective
A team of Harvard scientists and engineers has demonstrated a rechargeable battery that could make storing electricity from intermittently available energy sources, like sun and wind, safe and cost-effective for both residential and commercial use.
The new research builds on earlier work by members of the same team that could enable cheaper and more reliable electricity storage at the grid level.
In the new battery, electrons are picked up and released by compounds composed of inexpensive, Earth-abundant elements (carbon, oxygen, nitrogen, hydrogen, iron and potassium) dissolved in water. The compounds are nontoxic, nonflammable, and widely available, making them safer and cheaper than other battery systems.
“This is chemistry I’d be happy to put in my basement,” said Michael J. Aziz, the Gene and Tracy Sykes Professor of Materials and Energy Technologies at the Harvard Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS), and the project’s principal investigator. “The nontoxicity and cheap, abundant materials placed in water solution mean that it’s safe — it can’t catch on fire — and that’s huge when you’re storing large amounts of electrical energy anywhere near people.”
The research appears in a paper published today in the journal Science.
This new battery chemistry was discovered by postdoctoral fellow Michael Marshak and graduate student Kaixiang Lin working together with co-lead author Roy Gordon, the Thomas Dudley Cabot Professor of Chemistry and Professor of Materials Science at Harvard.
“We combined a common organic dye with an inexpensive food additive to increase our battery voltage by about 50 percent over our previous materials,” said Gordon. The findings “deliver the first high-performance, nonflammable, nontoxic, noncorrosive, and low-cost chemicals for flow batteries.”
Unlike solid-electrode batteries, flow batteries store energy in liquids contained in external tanks, similar to fuel cells. The tanks (which set the energy capacity), as well as the electrochemical conversion hardware through which the fluids are pumped (which sets peak power capacity), can be sized independently. Since the amount of energy that can be stored can be arbitrarily increased by scaling up the size of the tanks, greater amounts of energy can be stored at lower cost than traditional battery systems.
Improving on improvements
The active components of electrolytes in most flow battery designs have been metal ions, such as vanadium dissolved in acid. The metals can be expensive, corrosive, tricky to handle, and kinetically sluggish, leading to inefficiencies. Last year, Aziz and his Harvard colleagues demonstrated a flow battery that replaced metals with organic (carbon-based) molecules called quinones. Quinones are abundant, naturally occurring chemicals that are integral to biological processes such as photosynthesis and cellular respiration.
While quinones in a water solution formed the negative electrolyte side of the battery, the positive side relied on a conventional bromine-bearing electrolyte that is used in several other batteries. The high performance and low cost of the technology, which Harvard has licensed to a company in Europe, hold the potential to provide scalable grid-level storage solutions to utilities.
But bromine’s toxicity and volatility make it most suitable for settings where trained professionals can deal with it safely behind secure fences.
So the team began searching for a new recipe that would provide comparable storage advantages — inexpensive, long-lasting, efficient — using chemicals that could be safely deployed in homes and businesses. Their new battery replaces bromine with a nontoxic and noncorrosive ion called ferrocyanide.
“It sounds bad because it has the word ‘cyanide’ in it,” said co-lead author Marshak, who is now assistant professor of chemistry at the University of Colorado Boulder. “Cyanide kills you because it binds very tightly to iron in your body. In ferrocyanide, it’s already bound to iron, so it’s safe. In fact, ferrocyanide is commonly used as a food additive, and also as a fertilizer.”
Because ferrocyanide is highly soluble and stable in alkaline rather than acidic solutions, the Harvard team paired it with a quinone compound that is soluble and stable under alkaline conditions, in contrast to the acidic environment of the original battery they developed last year.
Marshak compared exposure to the concentrated alkaline solution to coming into contact with a damaged disposable AA battery. “It’s not something you want to eat or splash around in, but outside of that it’s really not a problem.”
There are other advantages to using alkaline solution. Because it is noncorrosive, the flow battery system components can be made of simpler and much less expensive materials, such as plastics.
“First-generation flow batteries were single-element couples — transition metals like vanadium or iron or chrome,” said Michael Perry, project leader for electrochemical systems at United Technologies Research Center, who was not involved in the work. “Now we’re seeing the possibility of engineered molecules giving us the properties and attributes that we want in one complete system. More work is required and justified, but the Harvard team is really demonstrating the promise of next-generation chemistries.”
Harvard’s Office of Technology Development has been working closely with the research team to navigate the shifting complexities of the energy storage market and build relationships with companies well-positioned to commercialize the new chemistries.
Switch to storage instead of “net metering”
The demand for battery storage is driven as much by regulatory factors as by economic ones. In some states, as well as many parts of the world, if it can’t be used instantly to meet, solar energy incident on solar panels goes to waste if the electricity isn’t stored. However, in many states, customers have the right to sell electricity produced by rooftop solar panels at high consumer rates under a regulatory scheme called “net metering.” Under those circumstances, consumers have little incentive to install batteries. However, market experts like William W. Hogan, the Raymond Plank Professor of Global Energy Policy at Harvard Kennedy School, believe that such policies are ultimately “uneconomic and unsustainable.” And as more and more homeowners install solar panels, utilities are opposing requirements to buy electricity from their customers.
Hogan says net metering is one of a series of “regulatory gimmicks designed to make solar more attractive” and predicts that eventually consumers with rooftop photovoltaic panels will lose the option of exchanging electricity for discounts on their utility bills. When that happens, homeowners will have an incentive to invest in battery storage.
Read more: Green storage for green energy grows cleaner
The Latest on: Green Energy Storage
via Google News
The Latest on: Green Energy Storage
- Green groups push for environmental protections in stimulus packageon March 23, 2020 at 2:36 pm
Green groups see the coronavirus stimulus package as a way to push for environmental measures, an idea that's gaining traction in the Democrat-led House but contributing to stalled negotiations in the ...
- The sky’s the limit: How solar and storage can set a post-COVID-19 exampleon March 23, 2020 at 7:21 am
As we know, the solar and energy storage industries are the keys to help unlock the clean energy transition ... Until more sustainable flying alternatives are available, such as green hydrogen-powered ...
- Could Sinking Oil Prices Open Door For ‘Green’ Hydrogen, Some Hopeon March 20, 2020 at 11:02 am
Most hydrogen still comes from natural gas, and broad commercial adoption of hydrogen for transportation, electric and industrial applications has lagged. But some hope sinking oil prices will breathe ...
- Recent Graphene Innovations in Green Energy Applicationson March 20, 2020 at 4:28 am
A large amount of scientific evidence has indicated that graphene-based products can improve the efficiency of current green energy technologies and energy storage systems that are essential to the ...
- Gresham House agrees 50-MW energy storage purchase in UKon March 20, 2020 at 2:56 am
Veselina Petrova is one of Renewables Now's most experienced green energy writers. For several years she has been keeping track of game-changing events both large and small projects and across the ...
- Is Green Hydrogen The Future Of Energy Storage?on March 18, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Norwegian energy and shipping consulting firm DNV GL has stated in their report, “The Promise of Seasonal Storage” that a major competitor to battery storage is coming, and it will be cost-competitive ...
- Bright Near-Term Outlook for Alternative Energy Industryon March 18, 2020 at 3:12 pm
The Zacks Alternative Energy industry can be fundamentally segregated into two sets of companies. While one group is involved in the generation and distribution of alternative energy and electricity ...
- EU Industry Body Wants Data Centers to Become Part of the Energy Gridon March 17, 2020 at 4:35 pm
Since the energy storage systems currently on the market are too expensive to make such a set-up profitable, government could step in with incentives to make it work financially for the operators, ...
- Beijing Jingneng Plans to Build 5GW Clean Energy & Storage Planton March 16, 2020 at 9:32 pm
Sign up to receive the Green Daily daily newsletter and follow us @climate. Beijing Jingneng Power Co., a Chinese state-owned utility, plans to invest 23 billion yuan ( $3.3 billion) in a project that ...
- EGEB: Virginia passes green energy legislation hailed as ‘transformational’on March 10, 2020 at 7:03 am
The law doubles the state’s offshore wind goal to 5.2GW, which will put Virginia third in the country for offshore wind, and creates incentives for 16.1GW of solar PV and 2.7GW of energy storage.
via Bing News