Sometimes lasting change takes a lot longer than it should. Consider, for example, the U.S. Navy’s testing and training with heavy explosives and high-intensity sonar in species-rich coastal waters around the world.
Since 1994, the Natural Resources Defense Council (“NRDC”) has prosecuted a series of federal lawsuits to persuade the Navy to adopt – and its federal regulator the National Marine Fisheries Service to require — common sense safeguards for the protection of whales and other marine life from unnecessary and avoidable harm. In none of these cases has a choice been required between training or not, between military readiness or not; in every case the choice presented has been training recklessly – in violation of federal law — or training in an environmentally responsible way.
With a groundbreaking settlement of two lawsuits this week, there is renewed hope that the Navy’s commitment to adopt significant new safeguards on two of its most important training ranges – in waters off southern California and Hawaii – could signal a fundamental shift in its approach toward wildlife conservation in the oceans in which it operates. For the first time, among other measures, the Navy has agreed to forego entirely or limit significantly its planned explosives testing and mid-range sonar training in designated areas of special importance to the survival of majestic blue whales, deep-diving beaked whales, critically endangered false killer whales, and other marine mammals needlessly put at risk by Navy training.
This agreement reflects real progress, with a solid commitment by the Navy to the most meaningful protective measures that NRDC and others, supported by the marine science community, have long sought. It is an important breakthrough in the Navy’s relationship to the oceans.
Why now? And what does this portend for the Navy’s willingness to adopt similar safeguards in its training elsewhere, in other ranges not covered by the settlement? According to a Navy spokesperson for the Pacific Fleet earlier this week, the Navy agreed to the settlement because it faced “a real possibility that the court would stop critically important testing and training,” needed to “prepare for missions in support of our national security.”
And, indeed, the Navy had reason to worry:
In a decision issued last spring in the cases settled this week, U.S. District Judge Susan Oki Mollway rejected in no uncertain terms, under a number of environmental laws, the Navy’s position. She cited, for example, the Navy’s “total failure to clearly consider important information” and “flaws so fundamental that the [environmental planning] document needs to be totally rewritten.” Judge Mollway concluded that “the Navy’s categorical and sweeping statements, which allow for no compromise at all as to space, time, species, or condition, do not constitute the ‘hard look’ required” by federal law.
The Latest on: Sonar Safeguards
via Google News
The Latest on: Sonar Safeguards
- Thales to Deliver the World’s First Fully Integrated Unmanned Mine Countermeasures System for the Royal Navy and French “Marine Nationale”on November 26, 2020 at 2:15 pm
With 50 years of expertise serving navies around the world, Thales develops technologies that enable the transition from conventional solutions, such as minehunters, to unmanned solutions. The MMCM ...
- Thales to Deliver the World’s First Fully Integrated Unmanned Mine Countermeasures System for the Royal Navy and French 'Marine Nationale'on November 26, 2020 at 1:18 pm
With the threat of mines and improvised explosive devices present in all conflicts involving naval forces, countries need to strengthen the protection of their maritime domain, to ensure the ...
- Taiwan starts building submarine fleet amid military threats from Beijingon November 24, 2020 at 10:00 am
Domestically developed vessels will have US combat systems, with the first to be delivered to the navy by 2025.
- Spain to buy ship to try and track down sunken treasureon November 21, 2020 at 11:37 am
The vessel will be equipped with remotely operated underwater robots and specialised sonar equipment that can ... The BAM-IS will help Spain safeguard its lost heritage from commercial treasure ...
- South Korea’s risky quest to build nuclear-powered attack submarineson November 17, 2020 at 4:00 pm
And while the treaty prohibits non-nuclear-armed states from building nuclear explosives, it does not explicitly prohibit other military applications, and traditional safeguards do not ... including ...
- Advanced Electric Utility Operations: What We Can Learn from the Nuclear Navyon November 12, 2020 at 4:00 pm
Challenges like how to establish situational awareness to operate more efficiently; how to build a knowledge repository into your operational processes to safeguard against staff ... submarines are ...
- Who Had the Best Submarine of the Cold War? Top 5 Contenderson November 9, 2020 at 4:00 pm
In case of real war, these submarines would safeguard (or destroy ... These innovations included powerful bow sonar, a streamlined, deep-dive capable hull, and advanced quieting technology.
- RCMP divers discover remains of 2 people at site of 1959 plane crashon January 31, 2019 at 4:55 pm
Through a sonar scan, they found the plane upside down in Peter Pond ... secretary "in full faith to my sworn oath to support and defend the Constitution, and to safeguard the country and its ...
- Rutherford’s secret war mission helped pioneer ‘sonar’on November 11, 2014 at 1:06 pm
“This momentous report was the foundation of subsequent anti-submarine warfare and would safeguard thousands of Allied lives ... the British originally called ‘ASDIC’ and later dubbed sonar. Early ...
- High court to decide if Navy doing enough to save whaleson June 23, 2008 at 4:59 am
"It's clear both that high intensity military sonar can injure and kill whales, dolphins, and other marine life and that the Navy can reduce the risk of this harm by commonsense safeguards without ...
via Bing News