Facial recognition software, which American military and intelligence agencies used for years in Iraq and Afghanistan to identify potential terrorists, is being eagerly adopted by dozens of police departments around the country to pursue drug dealers, prostitutes and other conventional criminal suspects. But because it is being used with few guidelines and with little oversight or public disclosure, it is raising questions of privacy and concerns about potential misuse.
Law enforcement officers say the technology is much faster than fingerprinting at identifying suspects, although it is unclear how much it is helping the police make arrests.
When Aaron Harvey was stopped by the police here in 2013 while driving near his grandmother’s house, an officer not only searched his car, he said, but also took his photograph and ran it through the software to try to confirm his identity and determine whether he had a criminal record.
Eric Hanson, a retired firefighter, had a similar experience last summer. Stopped by the police after a dispute with a man he said was a prowler, he was ordered to sit on a curb, he said, while officers took his photo with an iPad and ran it through the same facial recognition software. The officers also used a cotton swab to collect a DNA sample from the inside of his cheek.
Neither man was arrested. Neither had consented to being photographed. Both said officers had told them that they were using facial recognition technology.
“I was thinking, ‘Why are you taking pictures of me, doing this to me?’ ” said Mr. Hanson, 58, who has no criminal record. “I felt like my identity was being stolen. I’m a straight-up, no lie, cheat or steal guy, and I get treated like a criminal.”
Lt. Scott Wahl, a spokesman for the 1,900-member San Diego Police Department, said the department does not require police officers to file a report when they use the facial recognition technology but do not make an arrest. The department has no record of the stops involving Mr. Hanson and Mr. Harvey, and Lieutenant Wahl said that he did not know about the incidents but that they could have happened.
“It is a test product for the region that we’ve allowed officers to use,” he said of facial recognition software and the hand-held devices the police use to take pictures. “We don’t even know how many are out there” in the region.
He said that until June 19, his department did not have a written policy regulating facial recognition software and only recently began training officers on its lawful use. Before then, he said, there were interim regional guidelines and training available.
County documents show that over 33 days in January and February, 26 San Diego law enforcement agencies used the software to try to identify people on more than 20,600 occasions — although officers found a match to criminal records only about 25 percent of the time.
Lieutenant Wahl said the department was not aware of any complaints about the software or about the policy of collecting DNA samples that Mr. Hanson and others have described.
The department uses the technology judiciously, Lieutenant Wahl said. “We don’t just drive around taking people’s picture and start swabbing them,” he said.
Others say misuse is common.
The Latest on: Facial Recognition Software
via Google News
The Latest on: Facial Recognition Software
- Is facial recognition technology worse at identifying darker-skinned faces than lighter ones?on February 3, 2020 at 2:34 pm
Mr Santow's claim is correct. Research shows that facial recognition technology is less accurate when seeking to identify darker-skinned faces. A study, which measured how the technology worked on ...
- Volusia County Sheriff's Office now using facial recognition softwareon February 3, 2020 at 12:32 pm
WESH 2 News looked into controversial technology that could help catch criminals: facial recognition software is being used in Volusia County. WESH 2 News got answers on how it works and why Orlando ...
- Moscow Court Case Challenges City's Facial Recognition Use After Launchon February 3, 2020 at 7:07 am
A court on Friday will hear a legal challenge to Moscow's rollout of facial recognition technology over privacy fears, after the final piece of its video surveillance jigsaw fell into place with the ...
- Why We Should Ban Facial Recognition Technologyon January 30, 2020 at 12:00 pm
Of the many unsettling aspects to Clearview AI, a shadowy facial-recognition-software company providing users access to a database of 3 billion photographs scraped from social media and video ...
- Facebook Will Pay $550 Million Over Facial Recognition Privacy Violationson January 30, 2020 at 9:41 am
The New York Times has reported that as a term of that settlement, "Facebook agreed to provide 'clear and conspicuous notice' about its face-matching software and obtain additional permission ...
- Moscow rolls out live facial recognition system with an app to alert policeon January 30, 2020 at 8:13 am
Moscow started trialing live facial recognition in 2017, using technology from Russian firm NtechLab to scan footage from the Russian capital’s network of 160,000 CCTV cameras. The company is best ...
- Facebook forced to pay $550 million settlement over facial recognition lawsuiton January 30, 2020 at 7:39 am
Illinois has some of the strictest biometric privacy laws, and a 2015 lawsuit alleges that the social network violated these laws through the use of facial-recognition software in its photo tag ...
- Facebook to Pay $550 Million to Settle Facial Recognition Suiton January 29, 2020 at 3:46 pm
It was another black mark on the privacy record of the social network, which also reported its quarterly earnings. Facebook said on Wednesday that it had agreed to pay $550 million to settle a ...
- Remember FindFace? The Russian Facial Recognition Company Just Turned On A Massive, Multimillion-Dollar Moscow Surveillance Systemon January 29, 2020 at 9:50 am
Built on several tens of thousands of cameras and what's claimed to be one of the most advanced facial recognition systems on the planet, Moscow has been quietly switching on a massive surveillance ...
- Rift emerges between regulators and businesses over Portland’s proposed facial recognition banon January 29, 2020 at 12:56 am
The Washington, D.C. think tank has board members who are lobbyists for firms including Amazon and Microsoft, both of which make facial recognition software. During an interview with GeekWire last ...
via Bing News