FREQUENT visitors to the Hustler Club, a gentlemen’s entertainment venue in New York, could not have known that they would become part of a debate about anonymity in the era of “big data”.
But when, for sport, a data scientist called Anthony Tockar mined a database of taxi-ride details to see what fell out of it, it became clear that, even though the data concerned included no direct identification of the customer, there were some intriguingly clustered drop-off points at private addresses for journeys that began at the club. Stir voter-registration records into the mix to identify who lives at those addresses (which Mr Tockar did not do) and you might end up creating some rather unhappy marriages.
The anonymisation of a data record typically means the removal from it of personally identifiable information. Names, obviously. But also phone numbers, addresses and various intimate details like dates of birth. Such a record is then deemed safe for release to researchers, and even to the public, to make of it what they will. Many people volunteer information, for example to medical trials, on the understanding that this will happen.
But the ability to compare databases threatens to make a mockery of such protections. Participants in genomics projects, promised anonymity in exchange for their DNA, have been identified by simple comparison with electoral rolls and other publicly available information. The health records of a governor of Massachusetts were plucked from a database, again supposedly anonymous, of state-employee hospital visits using the same trick. Reporters sifting through a public database of web searches were able to correlate them in order to track down one, rather embarrassed, woman who had been idly searching for single men. And so on.
Each of these headline-generating stories creates a demand for more controls. But that, in turn, deals a blow to the idea of open data—that the electronic “data exhaust” people exhale more or less every time they do anything in the modern world is actually useful stuff which, were it freely available for analysis, might make that world a better place.
Of cake, and eating it
Modern cars, for example, record in their computers much about how, when and where the vehicle has been used. Comparing the records of many vehicles, says Viktor Mayer-Schönberger of the Oxford Internet Institute, could provide a solid basis for, say, spotting dangerous stretches of road. Similarly, an opening of health records, particularly in a country like Britain, which has a national health service, and cross-fertilising them with other personal data, might help reveal the multifarious causes of diseases like Alzheimer’s.
This is a true dilemma. People want both perfect privacy and all the benefits of openness. But they cannot have both. The stripping of a few details as the only means of assuring anonymity, in a world choked with data exhaust, cannot work. Poorly anonymised data are only part of the problem. What may be worse is that there is no standard for anonymisation. Every American state, for example, has its own prescription for what constitutes an adequate standard.
All these approaches, though, are anathema to the open-data movement, because they limit the scope of studies. “If we’re making it so hard to share that only a few have access,” says Tim Althoff, a data scientist at Stanford University, “that has profound implications for science, for people being able to replicate and advance your work.”
The Latest on: Data Privacy
via Google News
The Latest on: Data Privacy
- IRS Not Infringing Privacy Requesting Crypto Exchange Data: US Judgeon November 30, 2019 at 9:28 am
that it seeks data that is irrelevant to its audit of the Petitioner’s reporting; thirdly, that it already possesses the information that it seeks from Bitstamp. Zietzke’s three subsequent arguments ...
- Protecting the future of student data privacy: The time to act is nowon November 29, 2019 at 10:00 am
The FTC is currently revisiting COPPA, and in August 2019, Sens. Dick Durbin Richard (Dick) Joseph Durbin Protecting the future of student data privacy: The time to act is now Overnight Health Care: ...
- European Parliament comes under fire from its own privacy regulator over election data concernson November 29, 2019 at 4:07 am
After spending years claiming the moral high ground around privacy, the European Parliament stands accused by its own data protection watchdog of passing on personal data to a US company that was ...
- Smart Home Data Security & Privacy Trends Report 2019: User Experiences, Technologies, Marketing & Sales Channelson November 27, 2019 at 10:26 am
DUBLIN, Nov. 27, 2019 /PRNewswire/ -- The "Trends in Smart Home Data Security and Privacy" report has been added to ResearchAndMarkets.com's offering. Connectivity in the home and the addition of ...
- Senate Democrats Unveil Data Privacy Legislationon November 27, 2019 at 5:09 am
Democratic members of the Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee led by Ranking Member Maria Cantwell, D-Wash., unveiled Federal data privacy legislation that aims to establish data ...
- Brexit ad blitz data firm paid by Vote Leave broke privacy laws, watchdogs findon November 27, 2019 at 3:13 am
A joint investigation by watchdogs in Canada and British Columbia has found that Cambridge Analytica-linked data firm, Aggregate IQ, broke privacy laws in Facebook ad-targeting work it undertook for ...
- Tom Still: Balancing health data and privacyon November 26, 2019 at 10:00 pm
Experts agree that analyzing the massive amounts of data captured in electronic medical records will dramatically improve diagnosis of diseases and chronic conditions, the study of epidemics and more.
- Washington Post: Congress needs to act on data privacy legislationon November 26, 2019 at 9:30 pm
It’s disheartening that attempts to address the downsides of the data economy have been mostly moribund for months. Privacy shouldn’t be a partisan issue, and members’ rhetoric has suggested it isn’t.
- As facial recognition tech races ahead of regulation, Chinese residents grow nervous about data privacyon November 26, 2019 at 9:11 pm
“But no one tells me why they collect the data and how they protect it.” He is not alone: Chinese consumers, generally thought to be more accepting of trading privacy for security, are growing ...
- Top Senate Democrats unveil new online privacy bill, promising tough penalties for data abuseon November 26, 2019 at 1:56 pm
WASHINGTON — Senate Democrats on Tuesday proposed tough new punishments for Facebook, Google and other Silicon Valley tech giants that mishandle their users’ personal data, unveiling a sweeping new ...
via Bing News