Paul Ehrlich and others use highly conservative estimates to prove that species are disappearing faster than at any time since the dinosaurs’ demise
There is no longer any doubt: We are entering a mass extinction that threatens humanity’s existence.
That is the bad news at the center of a new study by a group of scientists including Paul Ehrlich, the Bing Professor of Population Studies in biology and a senior fellow at the Stanford Woods Institute for the Environment. Ehrlich and his co-authors call for fast action to conserve threatened species, populations and habitat, but warn that the window of opportunity is rapidly closing.
“[The study] shows without any significant doubt that we are now entering the sixth great mass extinction event,” Ehrlich said.
Although most well known for his positions on human population, Ehrlich has done extensive work on extinctions going back to his 1981 book, Extinction: The Causes and Consequences of the Disappearance of Species. He has long tied his work on coevolution, on racial, gender and economic justice, and on nuclear winter with the issue of wildlife populations and species loss.
There is general agreement among scientists that extinction rates have reached levels unparalleled since the dinosaurs died out 66 million years ago. However, some have challenged the theory, believing earlier estimates rested on assumptions that overestimated the crisis.
The new study, published in the journal Science Advances, shows that even with extremely conservative estimates, species are disappearing up to about 100 times faster than the normal rate between mass extinctions, known as the background rate.
“If it is allowed to continue, life would take many millions of years to recover, and our species itself would likely disappear early on,” said lead author Gerardo Ceballos of the Universidad Autónoma de México.
Using fossil records and extinction counts from a range of records, the researchers compared a highly conservative estimate of current extinctions with a background rate estimate twice as high as those widely used in previous analyses. This way, they brought the two estimates – current extinction rate and average background or going-on-all-the-time extinction rate – as close to each other as possible.
Focusing on vertebrates, the group for which the most reliable modern and fossil data exist, the researchers asked whether even the lowest estimates of the difference between background and contemporary extinction rates still justify the conclusion that people are precipitating “a global spasm of biodiversity loss.” The answer: a definitive yes.
The Latest on: Sixth mass extinction
via Google News
The Latest on: Sixth mass extinction
- 'Introducing Palaeontology' -- how the fossil record informs today's conservation decisionson December 2, 2020 at 8:00 am
A new, expanded book -- 'Introducing Palaeontology: a guide to ancient life' -- provides a timely reminder of how the fossil record can inform critical conservation decisions of the future as Earth ...
- What is Remembrance Day for Lost Species and why does it matter?on November 30, 2020 at 7:42 am
We’re losing an estimated 150 species every day - that’s over 54,000 annually. Of all the species which have ever lived on earth, 99.9 per cent are believed to now be extinct. This is why Remembrance ...
- Lost species day: celebrities to champion threatened wildlifeon November 27, 2020 at 2:24 am
Amitav Ghosh, Margaret Atwood and Emma Thompson are among 20 activists and cultural figures to speak at Writers Rebel event ...
- The Journey through Holocene | Arnab Basu | Book reviewon November 25, 2020 at 3:57 am
The journey through Holocene” talks in detail about the collapse of ecosystem and theneed to conserve it before it gets too late.
- 27 Amazing Animals That Are Almost Extincton November 24, 2020 at 4:46 pm
The Holocene Extinction, or the Sixth Extinction ... to be exact—the mass extinction has been accelerating at a dizzying pace. In the 20th century, for example, we lost about 543 land vertebrate ...
- Climate Change: Today’s catastrophic concerns shaped by past interactions between science, cultureon November 20, 2020 at 3:08 am
Champaign history professor David Sepkoski studies the history of science. His new book “Catastrophic Thinking ” examines how the interplay of science and culture over two centuries has… view more ...
- Expert IPCC Reviewer Speaks Outon November 20, 2020 at 1:00 am
Expert IPCC Reviewer Speaks Out Roger Hallam, co-founder of Extinction Rebellion/XR recently interviewed Peter Carter, M.D., who has the distinguished title – Expert IPCC Reviewer for the ...
- Fishers Among Men: Lake Tai’s Catholics Bid Farewell to the Waterson November 19, 2020 at 5:15 pm
For centuries, the lake’s has been home to a unique population of Catholic converts. A new fishing ban means the end of an era — but not their faith.
- Today's catastrophic concerns shaped by past interactions between science, cultureon November 19, 2020 at 12:27 pm
Catastrophic Thinking'' may seem a title well timed for 2020, given its global pandemic, wildfires and hurricanes. David Sepkoski's new book, however, is not a doomsday warning for the future, but a ...
- Don’t Miss: Can we halt a sixth mass extinction?on November 18, 2020 at 10:18 am
Can lessons from the past halt a sixth mass extinction? Future of Food and Agriculture, New Scientist Live’s day of online talks and demonstrations, tackles how we can eat well and still save ...
via Bing News