A telecommunications law academic in Australia has recommended for laws to be enacted criminalising the application of face recognition technology to visual images online that enable the identity of a person or people to be ascertained without their consent.
An article published today in the International Journal of Law and Information Technology has looked at the absence of laws surrounding face recognition technologies and has found that there are no laws which specifically address the issue of unauthorised application of face recognition technologies to online images. With the increasing popularity of uploading photographs on social networking sites, the paper calls for law and policy makers around the world to see this as a critical issue. Author of the paper, Associate Professor Niloufer Selvadurai says that, “there is a need to protect individual identity and autonomy through enactment of appropriate laws to countervail the potential threats to privacy posed by the application of facial recognition technologies.”
Face recognition technologies involve a one-to-many process of identification whereby complex algorithms relating to facial features and appearance are utilised to identify an unknown party from a set of known possibilities. This comparison feature of the technology is what houses the potential to undermine individual privacy.
Using Australian law as an example case study as well as looking at laws and social norms around the world, the article analyses one of the fastest growing areas of biometric technology and concludes that this technology could be readily accessible to the general public, moving it beyond commercial systems. Although face recognition technologies have been in use for some time, it has been enhanced by the relatively recent development of 3D scanning technology which enables significantly increased accuracy. The article infers that the current approach is not suitable to the modern digital environment. They also talk about the need to appreciate a ‘two-way mirror model of the internet’ – where public and private users are simultaneously watching and being watched – when thinking about new laws to protect privacy from face recognition technology.
The author commented that “the law should be responsible for creating private spaces within the otherwise public space of the internet”.
The Latest on: Face recognition
via Google News
The Latest on: Face recognition
- Recommended Reading: When facial recognition identifies the wrong personon June 27, 2020 at 7:07 am
Law enforcement at all levels are employing facial recognition for a variety of things. When the US and countries around the world began to shut down, tech companies of all sizes announced plans to ...
- Facial recognition software under fire after misidentification causes wrongful arreston June 27, 2020 at 6:58 am
NBC News’ Jacob Ward reports on the fallout of a wrongful arrest of a Michigan man due to misidentification from facial recognition software.
- Facial recognition leads to first wrongful U.S. arrest, activists sayon June 26, 2020 at 10:41 am
Robert Williams spent over a day in custody in January after face recognition software matched his driver’s license photo to surveillance video of someone shoplifting.
- Boston's move to ban facial recognition could pressure big tech players to exit the marketon June 26, 2020 at 7:44 am
Boston's facial recognition ban could precipitate similar initiatives in other US cities, adding pressure for big tech players to exit the market.
- Man wrongfully arrested due to facial recognition software talks about 'humiliating' experienceon June 26, 2020 at 6:55 am
A Black man in Detroit spent over a day in custody in January after an incorrect facial recognition match led to his wrongful arrest.
- The little-known AI firms whose facial recognition tech led to a false arreston June 26, 2020 at 3:00 am
The opaque industry that sells facial recognition technology, and the patchwork of police policies that govern its use, have made effective oversight extremely difficult.
- Facial-Recognition Backlash Brews After Fury Over Police Conducton June 26, 2020 at 1:00 am
When the American Civil Liberties Union ran a test of Amazon.com Inc.’s facial recognition technology, the software falsely matched 28 members of Congress, many of them minorities, with mugshots of ...
- Democratic lawmakers just introduced a bill that would ban the use of facial recognition technology by federal law enforcementon June 25, 2020 at 1:01 pm
The proposed bill comes after civil rights advocates have campaigned against the technology for years amid growing evidence of racial bias.
- Democratic lawmakers seek to ban government use of facial recognition technology with new billon June 25, 2020 at 11:48 am
This comes after IBM, Microsoft and Amazon said they would end sales of the technology to law enforcement, at least temporarily.
- Black man wrongfully arrested because of incorrect facial recognitionon June 25, 2020 at 11:17 am
A Black man was wrongfully arrested and held in a detention center for nearly 30 hours in Michigan after facial recognition technology incorrectly identified him as a suspect in a shoplifting case, ...
via Bing News