Women have made enormous contributions to STEM fields for centuries. But you might be hard pressed to know that from our regular histories. A new book gives these women their just credit.
My book about scientists began with beef stroganoff. According to the New York Times, Yvonne Brill made a mean one. In an obituary published in March 2013, Brill was honored with the title of “world’s best mom” because she “followed her husband from job to job and took eight years off from work to raise three children.” Only after a loud, public outcry did the Times amend the article so it would begin with the contribution that earned Brill a featured spot in the paper of record in the first place: “She was a brilliant rocket scientist.” Oh right. That.
The error—stroganoff before science; domesticity before personal achievement—is so cringe-worthy because it’s a common one. In 1964, when Dorothy Crowfoot Hodgkin won the greatest award that chemistry has to offer, a paper declared “Nobel Prize for British Wife,” as if she had stumbled upon the complex structures of biochemical substances while matching her husband’s socks. We simply don’t speak of men in science this way. Their marital status isn’t considered necessary context in a biochemical breakthrough. Employment as an important aerospace engineer is not the big surprise hiding behind a warm plate of noodles. For men, scientific accomplishments are accepted as something naturally within their grasp.
In 1899, the inventor and physicist Hertha Ayrtonput on a demonstration showing her latest breakthrough in calming the temperament of the arc light, long notorious for hissing and flickering. When the paper reported on the presentation, it treated Ayrton like some kind of circus performer: “What astonished the lady visitors. . .was to find one of their own sex in charge of the most dangerous-looking of all the exhibits. Mrs. Ayrton was not a bit afraid.” Annoyed by this and many other similar perspectives, Ayrton called out a persistent problem with the way she and her contemporaries like Marie Curie were treated: “The idea of ‘women and science’ is entirely irrelevant. Either a woman is a good scientist or she is not; in any case she should be given opportunities, and her work should be studied from the scientific, not the sex, point of view.”
Even today, it’s important we hear those words again. We need not only fairer coverage of women in science, but more of it.
The Latest on: Women in science
via Google News
The Latest on: Women in science
- Women in science: Under the sea with marine scientist, Anjani Ganaseon May 12, 2020 at 3:06 pm
Apart from a mermaid’s tail, marine scientist Dr Anjani Ganase and ‘The Little Mermaid’s Ariel have much in common – they spend much of their time in water and have a lov ...
- Tripathi interviews ‘Raven the Science Maven’ in latest episode of ‘Take 5’on May 12, 2020 at 4:29 am
The GSE doctoral student and science educator is the UB president's guest in the lastest episode of his Zoom series.
- Women In Science Puppet Theater Series, Episode 2: The Tale Of Cosmetic Chemist, Hazel Bishopon May 5, 2020 at 7:09 am
Kids get to know Hazel Bishop, the woman who invented the first mass-marketable indelible lipstick and founded a multimillion-dollar business on it.
- Eight Receive UW Own It! Awards for Women in Scienceon May 4, 2020 at 11:17 am
The Own It! Awards honor “the outstanding women on campus and around Wyoming who are doing amazing work in STEM,” says Lisa Abeyta, UW coordinator of Student Research Programs. The program is located ...
- UNESCO’s Alice Ochanda talks on challenges women in science faceon April 28, 2020 at 10:47 am
To find out what’s on the cards Estienne de Klerk, spokesperson for the Property Industry Group and Chairman of the SA REIT Association joins CNBC Africa for more. "Yet 10,000 applications were ...
- Pioneering researcher and advocate for women in science named MSU provoston April 28, 2020 at 2:16 am
Additionally, she is an advocate for women in science and led efforts to change federal policy to mandate the use of females in fundamental National Institutes of Health research. Together ...
- Leading researcher, advocate for women in science named provoston April 27, 2020 at 9:42 am
Oncofertility is now globally recognized as a medical discipline. In addition, she is an advocate for women in science and led efforts to change federal policy to mandate the use of females in ...
- Leading researcher, advocate for women in science named MSU provoston April 26, 2020 at 5:00 pm
In addition, she’s an advocate for women in science and has led efforts to change federal policy to mandate the use of females in fundamental National Institute of Health research.
- Graduate Women in Science (GWIS) Foundation Fellowshipson April 26, 2020 at 5:00 pm
Must be a women scientist. Must have already completed a bachelor’s degree. Must be conducting research in the natural sciences (fields of social science that use the scientific method are eligible to ...
- Participation of women in science, technology development for water resources management, with support of UNESCO and national institutionson April 26, 2020 at 5:00 pm
The National Institute of Water (INA) with the support of the National Office of Hydraulic Infrastructure and UNESCO WWAP is developing a diagnostic analysis of the current levels of participation of ...
via Bing News