How fast is online learning evolving? Are wind turbines a promising investment? And how long before a cheap hoverboard makes it to market?
Attempting to answer such questions requires knowing something about the rate at which a technology is improving. Now engineers at MIT have devised a formula for estimating how fast a technology is advancing, based on information gleaned from relevant patents.
The researchers determined the improvement rates of 28 different technologies, including solar photovoltaics, 3-D printing, fuel-cell technology, and genome sequencing. They searched through the U.S. Patent Office database for patents associated with each domain — more than 500,000 total — by developing a novel method to quickly and accurately select the patents that best represent each technology.
Once these were identified, the researchers analyzed certain metrics across patents in each domain, and found that some were more likely to predict a technology’s improvement rate than others. In particular, forward citations — the number of times a patent is cited by subsequent patents — is a good predictor, as is the date of a patent’s publication: Technologies with more recent patents are likely innovating at a faster rate than those with older patents.
The team devised an equation incorporating a patent set’s average forward citation and average publication date, and calculated the rate of improvement for each technology domain. Their results matched closely with the rates determined through the more labor-intensive approach of finding numerous historical performance data points for each technology.
Among the 28 domains analyzed, the researchers found the fastest-developing technologies include optical and wireless communications, 3-D printing, and MRI technology, while domains such as batteries, wind turbines, and combustion engines appear to be improving at slower rates.
Chris Benson, a former graduate student in MIT’s Department of Mechanical Engineering, says the new prediction tool may be of interest to venture capitalists, startups, and government and industry labs looking to explore new technology.
“There’s a lot of nuance to our method, and I don’t see it as something to hand out to the masses to play with,” says Benson, who helped developed the prediction tool. “I see it more as something where we work with somebody to help them understand what the future technological capabilities that they’re interested in are. We’re probably more like a real estate agent, and less like Zillow.”
Benson and Chris Magee, a professor of the practice of engineering systems at MIT, have published their results this week in the journal PLoS ONE. The paper contains the fundamental findings and equations relating technological improvement to a variety of patent characteristics.
In 2003, Magee began determining the improvement rates of various technologies. At the time, he was curious how technologies were developing relative to Moore’s Law — an observation pertaining originally to computers, in which transistors on a computer chip double every two years.
“There were a lot of things that weren’t going as fast as Moore’s Law, and I started trying to get measures of them,” Magee recalls.
Magee initially approached the problem on a case-by-case basis, determining which metrics best represent productivity for a given domain. He then compiled data for each metric, such as the price and speed of manufacturing a product, and used the data to calculate the overall rate of improvement. In 2010, he realized that one of the most comprehensive resources on technology lay in the U.S. patent record.
“We thought, ‘Maybe there’s enough information there that we can do something about linking it to the dynamism of technical change,’” Magee says.
For several years, he and his group identified the most relevant patents in a technological domain, by literally reading through thousands of patents — an incredibly time-intensive process. The approach was not very reliable, as two people may choose entirely different sets of patents to represent the same technology.
A “Standard & Poor’s” for technology
In 2012, Magee and Benson came up with a more efficient, repeatable method for identifying relevant patent sets, by looking at the overlap between the U.S. and international patent-classification systems.
For each patent accepted by the U.S. Patent Office, a patent reviewer will file the patent under several classes within both classification systems. For instance, a solar photovoltaics patent may be entered under the U.S. classes “batteries” and “active solid-state devices” and within the international system as “semiconductor devices.”
The team found that by looking for patent overlap between both classification systems, they could repeatedly identify the same set of patents that best represent a technology, within a matter of hours, rather than months.
Once they identified a relevant set of patents, the researchers looked for metrics within patents that they could use to calculate a technology’s rate of improvement. They found that a patent set’s average forward citations within the first three years after publication, and the average date of publication, were the best predictors of technological improvement. Benson says they were also able to weed out less-helpful patent information.
“If a technology has more patents in general, it should be moving faster, but that turns out not to be the case,” Benson says. “3-D printing only has 300 to 500 patents, and that’s improving at the same rate as semiconductors, which have about 150,000 patents. So there’s almost zero correlation.”
The team devised a simple equation incorporating forward citation and publication date, and used the method to predict improvement rates for 28 technologies. The researchers then compared the rates with those they previously obtained using their more time-intensive, historical data-based approach, and found the results from both methods matched closely.
They then used their more efficient approach to predict the improvement rates of 11 emerging technologies in the next 10 years. Among these, the fastest-growing domains appear to be online learning and digital representation, while slower technologies include food engineering and nuclear fusion.
Doyne Farmer, a professor of mathematics at Oxford University, says that the notion that technological progress is predictable “is both intellectually fascinating and quite powerful in its practical implications.”
Read more: Patents forecast technological change
The Latest on: Forecasting technological change
via Google News
The Latest on: Forecasting technological change
- Green Technology and Sustainability Market to Reach $44.61 Bn, Globally, by 2026 at 26.5% CAGR: Allied Market Researchon May 12, 2020 at 6:30 am
Allied Market Research published a report, titled, "Green technology and sustainability Market by Technology (Internet of Things (IoT), ...
- Climate change forecast: Sea levels could rise by 1M if CO2 emissions are not cut by 2100on May 11, 2020 at 11:22 am
CLIMATE change threatens to raise sea levels by 4.2ft (1.3m) by 2100 if greenhouse emissions are not drastically cut, researchers from Singapore have warned.
- 50th Anniversary of the 1970 Lubbock Tornado: Improvements in Technology & Forecastingon May 11, 2020 at 10:21 am
On May 11, 1970, a tornado hit Lubbock and killed 26 people. 50 years later, the City of Lubbock and Texas Tech University are honoring the deceased and everyone who was impact by the damage it caused ...
- Week 20 MDA Breakout Forecast: Short-Term Picks To Give You An Edgeon May 10, 2020 at 8:13 am
Two sample Breakout Stocks for Week 20 with better than 10% short-term upside potential. New Momentum Gauge™ section to help you use the best types of trades fo ...
- Earnings Report: Aspen Technology, Inc. Missed Revenue Estimates By 6.5%on May 8, 2020 at 11:20 am
It's shaping up to be a tough period for Aspen Technology, Inc. (NASDAQ:AZPN), which a week ago released some disappointing third-quarter results that could have a notable impact on how the market ...
- Quotient Technology Inc. (NYSE:QUOT) Just Reported, And Analysts Assigned A US$10.28 Price Targeton May 8, 2020 at 6:21 am
It's been a mediocre week for Quotient Technology Inc. (NYSE:QUOT) shareholders, with the stock dropping 12% to US$5.96 in the week since its latest first-quarter results. It was a moderately negative ...
- Global Inorganic Advanced Phase Change Materials (PCM) Market 2020 Key Performance, Top Players, Segmentation, Future Plans and Forecast to 2026on May 6, 2020 at 7:11 am
Global Inorganic Advanced Phase Change Materials (PCM) Market 2020 by Manufacturers, Regions, Type and Application, Forecast to 2026 equipped with market data from 2015 to 2026. The report comprises ...
- COVID-19 Impact on Renewable Energy Market by Technology, End-User and Region - Global Forecast to 2021 - ResearchAndMarkets.comon May 1, 2020 at 1:46 am
Impact on Renewable Energy Market by Technology (Wind and Solar), End-User (Utilities, Captive (Industrial, Commercial and Residential) and Region - Global Forecast to 2021" report has been added to ...
- Supply-Chain Executives Forecast How Technology Amid the Pandemic Can Transform Businesseson April 30, 2020 at 8:32 pm
The hidden inefficiencies within your operations have inevitably and rapidly surfaced.” With challenges and bottlenecks coming into full view, supply-chain executives will be compelled to fix the ...
- Industry forecast: Technology will drive COVID-19 recoveryon April 30, 2020 at 11:50 am
Report indicates modes moving smaller shipments are experiencing steady pricing overall as e-commerce usage from a largely remote-based workforce drives residential parcel delivery volumes. Meanwhile, ...
via Bing News