The technologists’ dream of remaking the planet to live with our carbon emissions is here. How do we stop one panicked country from deciding it’s time to press the button?
Here’s a scenario that seems plausible if we continue down our current path of only vaguely paying attention to climate change: There’s a drought in northern China, almost certainly exacerbated by global warming. People are dying. There’s famine and huge waves of migration out of the region. The government, not known for being calm in a crisis, faces enormous social unrest, and so it resorts to a drastic plan to change the weather, spraying sulfate aerosols—a combination of water vapor and sulfur—out of jets flying high in the sky. The wind carries the aerosols across the planet, eventually increasing the Earth’s albedo (its ability to reflect sunlight back into space) enough that the process of global warming is offset, even if greenhouse gas levels continue to build up in the atmosphere. The earth’s warming is alleviated for a time and, as a result, so are China’s droughts.
The operation wouldn’t cost much in the grand scheme of the world’s largest economies—on the order of billions of dollars per year, according to David Keith, one of the most prominent geoengineering proponents and a professor of applied physics and public policy at Harvard—and a sulfate aerosol spraying initiative with global ramifications could be done from a single airbase. The aerosol spraying could make the sky whiter, perpetually reminding us of how we’ve altered the climate. But how much would that matter if the world could preserve itself as it is today, avoiding the inevitable die-offs from long-term climate change? And in any case, how could the global community stop a country like China or India if it wanted to implement a geoengineering scheme without consent from the rest of the world?
These aren’t rhetorical questions. Over the last few months, scientists have started to more seriously tackle the questions surrounding geoengineering’s ramifications. And there’s a real possibility that altering the environment will be an option on the table at the upcoming international climate talks. If we have the technology, some countries—especially ones that didn’t get to reap the benefits of pumping out a planet-destroying amount of carbon—might argue, why aren’t we using it?
Sulfate aerosol spraying has a huge downside: once you start, you can never stop.
The sulfate aerosol scenario, a type of solar-radiation management (SRM), isn’t the only way to engineer the Earth’s climate so that it suits humanity’s needs, but because it’s relatively cheap and easy, it is one of the most likely schemes to be implemented. The concept of SRM has been around for decades, but interest in the topic has skyrocketed in the past few years, as the scale of climate change’s potential destruction has emerged. Sulfate aerosol spraying has a huge downside, however: once you start, you can never stop. A halt in the scheme would cause temperatures to rise rapidly, with potentially catastrophic results.
WHAT WE’RE CAPABLE OF
The concept of geoengineering goes back to at least the mid-1800s, when meteorologist James Pollard Epsy posited a method for generating artificial rain during droughts. In the 1960s and 1970s, geoengineering on a large scale started being taken seriously, as the former USSR considered ways to warm its tundra and turn it into farmland, according to the U.K.’s Royal Society.
Today, there are two basic approaches for geoengineering planetary systems to reduce climate change: SRM and removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere (Keith is president of a company called Carbon Engineering that has developed a technique for capturing CO2 from the air). Unlike SRM, scrubbing CO2 from the atmosphere eliminates the root cause of climate change (removing CO2 from the atmosphere) instead of just alleviating the symptoms (cooling the planet, but leaving greenhouse gases in the atmosphere). But it has its downsides—what should be done with all the captured CO2? Companies in the space have a variety of ideas, including making plastic and fuel out of scrubbed CO2.
The Latest on: Geoengineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Geoengineering
- Scientists Propose Pumping 74 Trillion Tonnes of Artificial Snow Onto to the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to Stop Its Collapseon July 22, 2019 at 2:46 pm
Researchers crunched the numbers on a massive geoengineering modelling experiment to learn what it would take to shore up the most imperilled glaciers on Earth. The results focus on pumping massive ... […]
- Here's how we'll control the weather in 100 yearson July 19, 2019 at 12:00 pm
The goal is to increase precipitation in places with water shortages. Cloud-seeding is a form of geoengineering- or manipulating of weather systems to reduce the negative effects of climate change. ... […]
- Betting on speculative geoengineering may risk an escalating 'climate debt crisis'on July 19, 2019 at 5:14 am
The opening of the Oscar-winning film The Big Short, a comedy-drama on the global financial crisis of 2007-2008, begins with a famous quote: "It ain't what you don't know that gets you into trouble. ... […]
- Full Disclosure: Extraterrestrials, No Nuclear War, End of the Deep State?on July 19, 2019 at 4:55 am
This is not to say that the Zionists and the Cabal cannot continue to wage wars, create millions of refugees, do geoengineering and artificially create earthquakes and violent weather while continuing ... […]
- 74 trillion tons of fake snow over Antarctic could 'save coastal cities' from climate change, researchers sayon July 18, 2019 at 11:17 am
This type of enormous feat of geoengineering would require energy from more than 12,000 wind turbines to provide power for massive seawater pumps and snow cannons, according to the researchers. ... […]
- Opinion: Betting on speculative geoengineering may risk an escalating ‘climate debt crisis’on July 18, 2019 at 6:38 am
Professor Mike Hulme and Dr Shinichiro Asayama from Cambridge’s Department of Geography discuss the climate ‘debt crisis’ and why geoengineering may make it worse, in this article originally published ... […]
- Scientists propose dumping 7,400 gigatons of 'artificial snow' on Antarcticaon July 17, 2019 at 7:38 pm
A trio of scientists have simulated a radical geoengineering project to dump 7.4 trillion tons of snow on Antarctica, suggesting it could stop runaway instability in the glaciers. Recent studies have ... […]
- Snow cannons can stabilize melting Antarctic ice shelves, physicists sayon July 17, 2019 at 11:03 am
pic.twitter.com/na1Lv6FMEv — Stef Lhermitte (@StefLhermitte) March 6, 2019 The challenges of such a geoengineering project are tremendous. Making that much ice would require pumping some 7.4 ... […]
- Genetically modified plants could help get to the root of climate changeon July 17, 2019 at 7:06 am
In reality, it’s going to take a multi-pronged approach encapsulating everything from reducing our individual carbon footprints to potentially more drastic solutions such as geoengineering. ... […]
- Chaos theory produces map for predicting paths of particles emitted into the atmosphereon July 16, 2019 at 8:41 am
Floating air particles following disasters and other geological events can have a lasting impact on life on Earth, and a new model drawing on chaos theory looks to help predict how these particles ... […]
via Bing News