Whether it’s crossing disciplines, breaking down silos, or thinking outside the box, everyone’s talking about boundary spanning as the key to solving the world’s toughest problems.
So why isn’t everyone doing it?
A new study conducted by Tom Bateman, Professor of Management at the McIntire School of Commerce, and Andrew Hess, Assistant Professor of Business Administration at Washington & Lee University, offers some intriguing clues. The study, titled “Different Personal Propensities among Scientists Relate to Deeper vs. Broader Knowledge Contributions,” appeared March 2, 2015, in the prestigious Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
“We wanted to see if we could predict who would do deeper, more specialized work, and who would do broader, boundary-spanning work,” says Bateman, an expert in leadership, motivation, and decision making. “Scientific research is absolutely crucial to the health and well-being of our planet and its people—and if we want to understand how scientific progress occurs, we have to develop a better understanding of why and how researchers pursue their work in the ways that they do.”
Examining 10-year archival records of research published by some 466 medical researchers, Bateman and Hess first scored each published article according to the depth and breadth of its contribution to existing knowledge. (Conveniently, the digital archive of which they made use indicates key subject terms for every article published, enabling the objective discernment of breadth and depth.) By indexing the scored articles by author, the two were then able to assess each researcher’s publication record according to its breadth and depth.
Next, Bateman and Hess sent questionnaires to the researchers, seeking insight into key work-related behaviors and attitudes. How might factors such as an individual’s professional competitiveness or conscientiousness affect the nature of their research output? What about the individual’s fundamental attitude toward their research, as either an opportunity to learn, or an opportunity to perform? “We were able to relate the researchers’ questionnaire scores to the breadth and depth of their research,” Bateman says. “And the predictors were different for the two different types of research output.”
Their findings? Broadly speaking, highly competitive researchers were more likely to turn out highly specialized work; similarly, highly conscientious researchers, keen to follow rules and meet expectations, likewise avoided breadth. Those who regarded their work as an opportunity to perform were also more likely to produce highly specialized research—but those who regarded their work as an opportunity to learn were likely to lean toward boundary-spanning breadth.
Bateman is quick to point out that the researchers’ behaviors are only that—behaviors. “These are not necessarily deeply engrained personality traits, but behavioral workplace styles that can be changed if people decide they want to change them,” he says. “If individual researchers know what their tendencies are, they can start to think strategically about whether they want to strive for greater depth, or greater breadth,” he says. “The same point applies to research teams and research administrators, who can start thinking about how to change goals and approaches to research output.”
The Latest on: Boundary spanning
via Google News
The Latest on: Boundary spanning
- She is changing the world. Her name is Professor Shanaaz Mathewson August 14, 2019 at 1:48 am
The team have also been awarded the Western Cape Government Boundary Spanning Leadership Award “which recognises leaders and leadership teams who achieve breakthrough results through collaboration ...
- A Plea for Boundary Spanningon June 1, 2019 at 12:43 pm
Lately, it feels as if we’re all hunkering down, drawing battle lines, and promoting an "us vs. them" mentality. Too many of us are taking sides and shutting out alternative perspectives, whether it’s ...
- Building High-Performance Teams: Lessons from the Himalayason April 30, 2019 at 1:20 pm
Drawing comparisons between my recent road trip and management research, I outline four points that can guide effective teamwork: strategic leadership, open communication, adaptability and boundary ...
- The Common Pitfalls of Demand Planningon December 7, 2018 at 7:04 am
Effective demand management is critical to the financial performance and health of an organization. Demand management is boundary spanning and, as such, needs to be independent of the functional ...
- Spanning the boundaries that limit organisational innovativenesson October 22, 2018 at 10:24 pm
As I detail in my paper, “Boundary Spanning in Global Organizations” in the Journal of Management Studies, for boundary spanning to be effective, it is imperative that both organisational and ...
- CHS: Small: Intra-Organizational Boundary Spanning: Strategic Implications for the Design, Implementation, and Use of Enterprise Social Mediaon August 30, 2018 at 5:00 pm
Note: When clicking on a Digital Object Identifier (DOI) number, you will be taken to an external site maintained by the publisher. Some full text articles may not yet be available without a charge ...
- What Is a Boundary Spanner in Public Relations?on July 28, 2018 at 4:59 am
Boundary spanning is a largely academic term for developing external relationships in order to accomplish your business objectives. This can be accomplished in business by such acts as joining an ...
- Boundary Spanning Leadership Practices for Population Healthon May 8, 2018 at 5:00 pm
This department highlights change management strategies that may be successful in strategically planning and executing organizational change initiatives. In this article, the authors discuss boundary ...
- Dedicated boundary-spanners can support a more effective relationship between science and policyon May 1, 2018 at 3:58 am
The exact definition and role of boundary-spanning, however, can be nebulous. As a result, boundary-spanning often gets conflated and confused with other approaches to bridging the gap between science ...
- Antecedents of Boundary Spanning in Cross-functional NPD Teamson January 23, 2018 at 9:34 pm
Boundary spanning has been shown in prior research to enhance innovativeness and performance of product development teams. In this study, we examine team conditions that foster boundary spanning ...
via Bing News