THE Republican Party has long resisted action on climate change, but now that much of the electorate wants something done, it needs to find a way out of the hole it has dug for itself.
A committee appointed by the National Research Council may just have handed the party a ladder.
In a two-volume report, the council is recommending that the federal government fund a research program into geoengineering as a response to a warming globe. The study could be a watershed moment because reports from the council, an arm of the National Academies that provides advice on science and technology, are often an impetus for new scientific research programs.
Sometimes known as “Plan B,” geoengineering covers a variety of technologies aimed at deliberate, large-scale intervention in the climate system to counter global warming.
Despairing at global foot-dragging, some climate scientists now believe that a turn to Plan B is inevitable. They see it as inscribed in the logic of the situation. The council’s study begins with the assertion that the “likelihood of eventually considering last-ditch efforts” to address climate destabilization grows every year.
The report is balanced in its assessment of the science. Yet by bringing geoengineering from the fringes of the climate debate into the mainstream, it legitimizes a dangerous approach.
Beneath the identifiable risks is not only a gut reaction to the hubris of it all — the idea that humans could set out to regulate the Earth system, perhaps in perpetuity — but also to what it says about where we are today. As the committee’s chairwoman, Marcia McNutt, told The Associated Press: The public should read this report “and say, ‘This is downright scary.’ And they should say, ‘If this is our Hail Mary, what a scary, scary place we are in.’ ”
Read more: The Risks of Climate Engineering
The Latest on: Climate Engineering
via Google News
The Latest on: Climate Engineering
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 31, 2019 at 8:19 am
Countries around the world are preparing to modify the earth's climate to cope with climate change, with many proponents touting it as a "public good." According to researchers, including faculty at ...
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 31, 2019 at 7:59 am
According to researchers, including faculty at Binghamton University, State University of New York, calling climate engineering a public good misrepresents the technical definition of a public good ...
- Climate engineering should not be considered a public good, new research showson October 30, 2019 at 5:00 pm
We allow third-party companies to serve ads and/or collect anonymous information. These companies may use non-personally identifiable information (browser type, time and date) in order to provide ...
- Climate engineering: International meeting reveals tensionson October 28, 2019 at 5:00 pm
The "hidden politics" of climate engineering were partially revealed earlier this year at the fourth United Nations Environment Assembly (UNEA-4), when Switzerland proposed a resolution on ...
- Climate Engineering: International Meeting Reveals Tensionson October 28, 2019 at 12:58 pm
At this point, the greatest danger of climate engineering may be how little is known about where countries stand on these potentially planet-altering technologies. At this point, the greatest danger ...
- The hidden politics of climate engineeringon October 28, 2019 at 9:11 am
Governments disagree even on the current state of climate change engineering governance, as became clear at the 2019 United Nations Environment Assembly negotiations. They must develop mechanisms to ...
- Climate engineering: International meeting reveals tensionson October 27, 2019 at 5:00 pm
At this point, the greatest danger of climate engineering may be how little is known about where countries stand on these potentially planet-altering technologies. Who is moving forward? Who is ...
- Would climate engineering be playing God?on May 5, 2019 at 11:36 pm
But we're getting ahead of ourselves. There are basically two approaches to climate engineering. One is to capture greenhouse gas emissions and bury them. The other, more controversial idea, is to ...
- Climate engineering needs to look at the big picture, says researcheron April 16, 2019 at 7:58 am
among the least studied is climate engineering. An umbrella term for large-scale projects designed to disrupt the Earth's carbon cycle or radiation balance, climate engineering has only relatively ...
via Bing News